This article investigates policy constraints for the environmental goods sector in Malaysia based on the dimensions of market-based (including regulatory) instruments and trade policies. In-depth structured interviews with the government and key industry players are conducted, and six overarching themes constraining the efficacy of the instruments and policies were identified. The findings suggest that incentives and loans for this sector are skewed to manufacturers and low-risk projects, respectively. The major policy gaps in this sector are mostly related to procedural issues, namely non-transparent information, non-uniformity of requirements and complex documentation for certification, licensing and permits.
AlaviR. (2007). An overview of key markets, tariffs and non-tariff measures on Asian exports of select environmental goods (ICTSD Trade and Environment Series Issue Paper No. 4). International Centre for Trade and Sustainable, Development (ICTSD): Geneva. https://ictsd.iisd.org/themes/environment/research/an-overview-of-key-markets-tariffs-and-non-tariff-measures-on-asian
2.
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). (2011). APEC leaders’ declaration—Trade and investment in environmental goods and services (Leaders Statement). https://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations?SelectedYear=2011&Page=1
3.
BalineauG., & de MeloJ. (2013). Removing barriers to trade on environmental goods: An appraisal. World Trade Review, 12(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745613000074
4.
BariaL., CattafestaC., & GarridoR. (2004). Environmental goods and services: Challenges and opportunities for central American and Caribbean countries. https://p166.unctad.org/file.php/54/29feb2008/docs/EnvGoodsAndServicesChallengesAndOppforCentral.pdf
5.
BaoX., & QiuL. D. (2010). Do technical barriers to trade promote or restrict trade? Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2010.9720865
6.
BjerkanK. Y., NorbechT. E., & NordtommeM. E. (2016). Incentives for promoting battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 43(1), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.002
7.
BorensteinS. (2017). Private net benefits of residential solar PV: The role of electricity tariffs, tax incentives, and rebates. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(S1), S85–S122.
8.
BucherH., Drake-BrockmanJ., KasterineA., & SugathanM. (2014). Trade in environmental goods and services: Opportunities and challenges. http://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/intracenorg/Content/Publications/AssetPDF/EGS%20Ecosystems%20Brief%20040914%20-%20low%20res.pdf
9.
CarpentierC. L., GallagherK. P., & VaughanS. (2005). Environmental goods and services in the World trade organization. Journal of Environment and Development, 14(2), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496505277218
10.
ChaytorB., & RazzaqueJ. (2004). Liberalising trade in environmental goods and services: In search of ‘win-win-win’ outcomes. https://www.academia.edu/1134011/Liberalising_trade_in_environmental_goods_and_services_in_search_ofwin-win-winoutcomes
11.
ChenM. X., WilsonJ. S., & OtsukiT. (2008). Standards and export decisions: Firm-level evidence from developing countries. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 17(4), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190802250027
12.
DavidM., & Sinclaire-DesgagneB. (2010). Pollution abatement subsidies and the eco-industry. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45(2), 271–282.
13.
de MeloJ. (2015). Trade liberalisation at the environmental goods agreement negotiations: What is on the table? How much to expect? Paper presented at the Third Annual Conference on Fiscal Policies and the Green Economy Transition: Generating Knowledge-Creating Impact. http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:46911
14.
de MeloJ., & VijilM. (2014). Barriers to trade in environmental goods and services: How important are they? How much progress at reducing them? (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP9869). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2444890
15.
DerisM., BuniaminS., AhmadN., & AlraziB. (2006). The utilisation of tax investment incentives on environmental protection activities among Malaysian companies. Paper presented at the International Conference on Energy and Environment, Malaysia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274458478_The_Utilisation_of_Tax_Investment_Incentives_on_Environmental_Protection_Activities_among_Malaysian_Companies
16.
DisdierA.-C., FekaduB., MurilloC., & WongS. A. (2008). Trade effects of SPS and TBT measures on tropical and diversification products (ICTSD Working Paper No. 12). ICTSD. https://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/downloads/2008/05/disdier_issuepaperno12.pdf
17.
EU FLEGT. (2017). Introduction and status update: The Malaysia-EU voluntary partnership agreement. http://www.euflegt.efi.int/background-malaysia
18.
FischerC. (2016). Strategic subsidies for green goods (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 16-12). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2789809
19.
FliessB., & KimJ.A. (2008). Non-tariff barriers facing trade in selected environmental goods and associated services. Journal of World Trade, 42(3), 535–562.
20.
FreyC. (2016). Tackling climate change through the elimination of trade Barriers for low-carbon goods: Multilateral, plurilateral and regional approaches. In MauerhoferV. (Ed.), Legal aspects of sustainable development—Horizontal and sectorial policy issues (pp. 449–468), Springer.
21.
GebrehiwetY., NgqangweniS., & KirstenJ. F. (2007). Quantifying the trade effect of sanitary and phytosanitary regulations of OECD countries on South African food exports. Agrekon, 46(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2007.9523759
22.
MyHijau. (2017). Green incentives. https://www.myhijau.my/green-incentives/
HammerenL. (2014). Sustainable development and liberalization of trade in environmental goods. An analysis of the APEC and WTO initiatives (Unpublished Master thesis). Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
25.
HeQ., FangH., WangM., & PengB. (2015). Trade liberalization and trade performance of environmental goods: Evidence from Asia-Pacific economic cooperation members. Applied Economics, 47(29), 3021–3039. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1011319
26.
HensonS., & LoaderR. (2001). Barriers to agricultural exports from developing countries: The role of sanitary and phytosanitary requirements. World Development, 29(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00085-1
27.
HeyesA. (2000). Implementing environmental regulation: Enforcement and compliance. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 17(2), 107–129.
28.
IacovoneL. (2005). The analysis and impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures. Integration and Trade, 28(19), 97–140.
29.
International Trade Centre (ITC). (2014). Trade in environmental goods and services—Opportunities and challenges. ITC.
30.
ITC. (2015). The invisible barriers to trade—How businesses experience non-tariff measures. ITC.
31.
JacobA., AndersK., & MollerA. K. (2017). Policy landscape of trade in environmental goods and services (ARTNeT Working Paper Series No. 166). https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/AWP%20No.%20166.pdf
32.
JaffeeS., & HensonS. (2004). Standards and agro-food exports from developing countries: Rebalancing the debate (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3348). World Bank Group. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23722950_Standards_and_AgroFood_Exports_from_Developing_Countries_Rebalancing_the_Debate
33.
JayasekharS., & KumarC. N. (2010). Compliance, competitiveness and market access: A study on Indian seafood industry (CDS Working Paper No. 422). https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/3161/wp422.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
34.
KandaW., HjelmO., & SantiagoM.-D. (2015). Promoting the export of environmental technologies: An analysis of governmental initiatives from eight countries. Environmental Development, 17(1), 73–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.009
35.
KediaS., PandeyR., & SinhaR. (2020). Shaping the post COVID-19 development paradigm in India: Some imperatives for greening the economic recovery. Millenial Asia, 11(3), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399620958509
36.
LangpapC. (2008). Self-reporting and private enforcement in environmental regulation. Environmental and Resources Economics, 40(4), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9166-8
37.
MakmorM., & IsmailZ. (2015). Improving environmental impact assessment (EIA) process in Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(1), 93–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4489
38.
Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA). (2017). Malaysia, well positioned to attract more solar investments. MIDA. http://www.mida.gov.my/home/3532/news/malaysia-well-positioned-to-attract-more-solar-investments/
39.
MIDA (2019a). Tax incentives for green industry. MIDA. https://www.mida.gov.my/home/tax-incentives-for-green-industry/posts/
MasakureO., HensonS., & CranfieldJ. (2009). Standards and export performance in developing countries: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 18(3), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190902986538
42.
MaskusK. E., WilsonJ. S., & OtsukiT. (2001). An empirical framework for analyzing technical regulations and trade. In MaskusK. E., & WilsonJ. S. (Eds.), Quantifying the impact of technical barriers to trade: Can it be done? (pp. 29–58). University of Michigan Press.
43.
MehtaR., & GeorgeJ. (2003). Processed food products exports from India: An exploration with SPS regime. India Habitat Centre. https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41962/1/aciar%20_2003_mehta_george.pdf
44.
MemonP. A. (2000). Devolution of environmental regulation: Environmental impact assessment in Malaysia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18(4), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767295
45.
MoeniusJ. (2004). Information versus product adaptation: The role of standards in trade. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.608022
46.
NordinR. M., HalimA. H. A., & YunusJ. (2017). Challenges in the implementation of green home development in Malaysia: Perspective of developers. (IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering No. 291). https://doi.dx/10.1088/1757-899X/291/1/012020
47.
NimubonaA. (2012). Pollution policy and trade liberalization of environmental goods. Environment Resource Economics, 53(1), 323–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9564-4
48.
OlanipekunA. O. (2016). The levels of building stakeholders’ motivation for adopting green buildings. In EbohonO. J., AyeniD. A., EgbuC. O., & OmoleF. (Eds.), Proceedings on Joint International Conference (JIC) on 21st Century Human Habitat: Issues, Sustainability and Development 2016 (pp. 8–19). https://www.academia.edu/25283726/The_Levels_of_Building_Stakeholders_Motivation_for_Adopting_Green_Buildings
49.
OtsukiT., WilsonJ. S., & SewadehM. (2001). Saving two in a billion: Quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards on African exports. Food Policy, 26(5), 495–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00018-5
50.
ParamasuaM., DevadasonE. S., & TehraniP. M. (2019). Environmental goods and services sector in Malaysia: Regulatory shortcomings and policy constraints. Institutions and Economies, 11(2), 73–99.
51.
PengL. M., YokeC. C., LingT. P., KandasamyS., & YeanU. L. (2019). An overview of current tax incentives matters among companies in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol9.1.2019
52.
PrasetyoF. A., PurwantoS. A., & HakimM. R. (2009). Making policies work for payment for environmental services (PES): An evaluation of the experience of formulating conservation policies in districts of Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28(3–5), 415–433.
53.
RamosM., & ChisariO. (2016). On the interaction between trade liberalization of environmental goods and services and the factor markets when reducing CO2 emissions: A CGE evaluation for Argentina, Brazil and Chile. Paper presented at XIV Arnoldshain Seminar, Argentina. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maria_Ramos36
54.
RobertsonP., & MelserD. (2005). Eco-labeling and the trade–environment debate. World Economy, 28(1), 49–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00674.x
55.
RochikashviliM., & BongaertsC. J. (2018). How eco-labelling influences environmentally conscious consumption of construction products. Sustainability, 10(2), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020351
56.
ShimshackJ. (2014). The economics of environmental monitoring and enforcement: A review. Annual Review of Resources Economics, 6(1), 339–360.
57.
SimmonsZ. S. (2014). Subsidizing solar: The case for an environmental goods and services carve-out from the global subsidies regime. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 32(2), 422–484. https://doi.org/10.5070/L5322022595
58.
SithamparamA. G., DevadasonE. S., & ChenayahS. (2017). Firms’ strategic responses to non-tariff measures: The case of Malaysian exporters. Institutions and Economies, 9(4), 89–107.
59.
SwannG., TempleP., & ShurmerM. (1996). Standards and trade performance: The UK experience. Economic Journal, 106(438), 1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235522
60.
TaminiL. D., & SorghoZ. (2016). Trade in environmental goods: Evidences from an analysis using elasticities of trade costs (Energy Working Paper 2016-3). http://dx.doi.org/DOI10.1007/s10640-017-0110-2
61.
TelleK. (2012). Monitoring and enforcement of environmental regulations lessons from a natural field experiment in Norway (Discussion Paper No. 680). https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp680.pdf
62.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2015). Review of maritime transport: Freight rates and maritime transport costs. UNCTAD.
63.
UNCTAD (2016). Trading into sustainable development: Trade, market access, and the sustainable development goals. UNCTAD.
64.
UNCTAD (2019). International classification of non-tariff measures, 2019 version. UNCTAD.
65.
UNCTAD-Trade Analysis Information System (UNCTAD-TRAINS). (2019). The global database on non-tariff measures. https://trains.unctad.org/
66.
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the, Pacific (UNESCAP). (2019). The rise of non-tariff measures. Asia Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2019 (pp. 4–11). UNESCAP.
VossenaarR. (2013). The APEC list of environmental goods: An analysis of the outcome and expected impact. ICTSD.
69.
YooS. H., & KimJ. (2011). Trade liberalization in environmental goods: Major issues and impacts. Korea and the World Economy, 12(3), 579–610.
70.
ZhangX. Z. (2013). Trade in environmental goods, with focus on climate-friendly foods and technologies. In Van CalsterG., & PrévostD. (Eds.), Research handbook on environment, health and the WTO (pp. 673–699). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
