This article has examined the implications of distance to secondary school on the achievement of secondary and higher education in India. Using the 71st round of National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) data, the article found that distance to secondary school beyond 2–3 km reduces the chances of getting secondary and higher education. For female members, secondary schools located beyond 2–3 km become a barrier to secondary and higher education; however, the distance beyond 5 km matters for male members. Economically better-off households and larger households have higher chances of completing secondary and higher education. Scheduled tribe households and households with casual workers have fewer chances of getting secondary or higher education. The households living in states with better transport facilities to the secondary schools have higher chances of getting secondary and higher education.
BarroR. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
2.
BarroR. (2002). Education as a determinant of economic growth. In LazearE. P. (Ed.), Education in the twenty-first century (pp. 9–24). Hoover Institution Press.
BommierA., & LambertS. (2000). Education demand and age at school enrolment in Tanzania. Journal of Human Resources, 35(1), 177–203.
5.
BrownP. H., & ParkA. (2002). Education and poverty in rural China. Economics of Education Review, 21(6), 523–541.
6.
BurdeD., & LindenL. L. (2012). The effect of village-based schools: evidence from a RCT in Afghanistan (NBER Working Paper No 18039). https://doi.org/10.3386/w18039
7.
CardD. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. Handbook of Labour Economics, 3(Part A), 1801–1863.
8.
ChudgarA. (2007). Looking beyond the household: The importance of community-level factors in understanding under-representation of girls in Indian education. In MaslakM. A. (Ed.), The agency and structure of women’s education. SUNY Press.
9.
ChudgarA. (2009). Does adult literacy have a role to play in addressing the universal elementary education challenge in India. Comparative Education Review, 53(3), 403–433.
10.
DeiningerK. (2003). Does cost of schooling affect enrollment by the poor? Universal primary education in Uganda. Economics of Education Review, 22(3), 291–305.
11.
DelgadoM. S., HendersonD. J., & ParmeterC. F. (2014). Does education matter for economic growth?Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76(3), 334–359.
12.
DrèzeJ., & KingdonG. G. (2001). School participation in rural India. Review of Development Economics, 5(1), 1–24.
13.
DufloE. (2001). Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an unusual policy experiment. American Economic Review, 91(4), 795–813.
14.
DufloE. (2004). The medium run effects of educational expansion: Evidence from a large school construction program in Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 74(1), 163–197.
15.
FalchT., LujalaP., & StrømB. (2013). Geographical constraints and educational attainment. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(1), 164–176.
16.
FrenetteM. (2004). Access to college and university: Does distance to school matter?Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 30(4), 427–443.
17.
FrenetteM. (2006). Too far to go on? Distance to school and university participation. Education Economics, 14(1), 31–58.
18.
GlickP., & SahnD. E. (2006). The demand for primary schooling in Madagascar: Price, quality, and the choice between public and private providers. Journal of Development Economics, 79(1), 118–145.
19.
GillA. S. (2017). State, market and social inequalities: A study of primary education in the Indian Punjab. Millennial Asia, 8(2), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399617715826
20.
Government of India. (2018). Educational statistics at a glance. Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education and Literacy, Statistics Division.
21.
GrilichesZ. (1977). Estimating the returns to schooling: Some econometric problems. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 45(1), 1–22.
22.
HandaS. (2002). Raising primary school enrolment in developing countries: The relative importance of supply and demand. Journal of Development Economics, 69(1), 103–128.
23.
HazarikaG. (2001). The sensitivity of primary school enrollment to the costs of post-primary schooling in rural Pakistan: A gender perspective. Education Economics, 9(3), 237–244.
24.
HolmesJ. (2003). Measuring the determinants of school completion in Pakistan: Analysis of censoring and selection bias. Economics of Education Review, 22(3), 249–264.
25.
IlonL., & MoockP. (1991). School attributes, household characteristics, and demand for schooling: A case study of rural Peru. International Review of Education, 37(4), 429–451.
26.
KabeerN. (2003). Gender mainstreaming in poverty eradication and the millennium development goals: A handbook for policy-makers and other stakeholders. Commonwealth Secretariat.
27.
KlingJ. R. (2001). Interpreting instrumental variables estimates of the returns to schooling. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19(3), 358–364.
28.
LavyV. (1996). School supply constraints and children’s educational outcomes in rural Ghana. Journal of Development Economics, 51(2), 291–314.
29.
MukhopadhyayA., & SahooS. (2016). Does access to secondary education affect primary schooling? Evidence from India. Economics of Education Review, 54, 124–142.
30.
NarwanaK. (2019). Hierarchies of access in schooling: An exploration of parental school choice in Haryana. Millennial Asia, 10(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399619853720
31.
NSSO. (2014). Social consumption in India education, 71st Round, CD-ROM. Government of India.
UNDP. (2019). Human development indices: A statistical update 2019. http://data.un.org/DocumentData.aspx?id=419
37.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2005). Children out of school: Measuring exclusion from primary education. UIS/AP/05-03. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/children-out-of-school-measuring-exclusion-from-primary-education-en_0.pdf
