Development policies need to be based on an integrated interpretation of values, facts and trends. With such an aim, the notion of Sustainable Human Development is described as the normative starting point. It can be fruitfully combined with the Innovation Systems’ conceptualization of some main empirical issues that shape development possibilities; a factual approach is sketched where particular attention is given to issues of power. Such a combination of a normative approach with a factual approach needs to be complemented by a prospective approach. Here, some possible and interrelated outcomes of trends concerning knowledge, production, the environment and inequality are discussed. Probable scenarios, main risks and better alternatives are considered; the last include special combinations of ideas, agency and technology. Inclusive and frugal innovation emerges as a fundamental challenge. The success of related policies appears to be highly dependent on solving the difficult political problem of connecting advanced knowledge and not privileged sectors.
AbrolD. (2014). Pro-poor innovation making, knowledge production, and technology implementation for rural areas: Lessons from the Indian experience. In RamaniS. V. (Ed.), Innovation in India. Combining economic growth with inclusive development (pp. 337–378). Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AnandS. & SenA. (2000). Human development and economic sustainability. World Development, 28(12), 2029–2049.
3.
ArocenaR. (2018). Power, innovation systems and development. Innovation and Development, 8(2), 271–285.
4.
ArocenaR. & SutzJ. (2012). Research and innovation policies for social inclusion: An opportunity for developing countries. Innovation and Development, 2(1), 147–158.
5.
ArocenaR. & SutzJ. (2014). Innovation and democratisation of knowledge as a contribution to inclusive development. In DutrenitG. & SutzJ. (Eds.), National innovation systems, social inclusion and development. The Latin American experience (pp. 15–33). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
6.
ArocenaR. & SutzJ. (2015). Sobre mudanca estrutural e políticas de conhecimento democrático. In CassiolatoJ. E.PodcameniM. G. & SoaresM. C. (Eds.), Sustentabilidade socioambiental em um contexto de crise (pp. 83–103). Río de Janeiro: E-papers. English version: ‘On structural change and democratic knowledge policies’. Retrieved from http://www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/ga2012/textos/Judith/Lecture%2013_FoArocena&Sutz.pdf
7.
ArocenaR. & SutzJ. (2016). Reading freeman when ladders for development are gone. In GhoshJ.KattelR. & ReinertE. (Eds.), Elgar handbook of alternative theories of economic development (pp. 441–445). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
8.
ArocenaR. & SutzJ. (2017). Science, technology and innovation for what? Exploring the democratization of knowledge as an answer. In KuhlmannS. & Ordóñez-MatamorosG. (Eds.), Research handbook on innovation governance for emerging economies: Towards better models (pp. 377–404). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
9.
BoundK. & ThorntonI. (2012). Our frugal future: Lessons from India’s innovation system. Retrieved from wwww.nesta.org.uk
10.
BrynjolfssonE. & McAfeeA. (2014). The second machine age. Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: Norton.
11.
CardosoF. E. & FalettoE. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12.
ChangH.-J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London, UK: Anthem Press.
13.
ChesnaisF. & SauviatC. (2003). The financing of innovation beyond related investment in the contemporary global finance-dominated accumulation regime. In CassiolatoJ.LastresH. & MacielL. (Eds.), Systems of innovation and development: Evidence from Brazil (pp. 61–119). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
14.
ECLAC (2016). Horizons 2030: Equality at the centre of sustainable development (LC/G.2660(SES.36/3)). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
15.
EvansP. & HellerP. (2015). Human development, state transformation and the politics of the developmental state. In LeibfriedS.HuberE.LangeM.LevyJ. D.NullmeierF. & StephensJ. D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state (pp. 691–713). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
FreemanC. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation (2nd ed.). London, UK: Pinter.
17.
GerthH. H. & MillsC. W. (1958). From Max Weber. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
HessD. J. (2007). Alternative pathways in science and industry. Activism, innovation, and the environment in an era of globalization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19.
HeyerJ.StewartF. & ThorpR. (2002). Group behaviour and development. Is the market destroying cooperation?Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
HodgsonG. M. (2015a). Conceptualizing capitalism: How the misuse of key concepts impedes our understanding of modern economies. Books & Ideas.net. Retrieved from http://www.booksandideas.net/IMG/pdf/20150507_conceptualizing_capitalism.pdf
21.
HodgsonG. M. (2015b). Conceptualizing capitalism. Institutions, evolution, future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
JosephK. J. (2014). Exploring exclusion in innovation systems: Case of plantation agriculture in India. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 73–90.
23.
KapurD. (2014). India’s economic development. In Currie-AlderB.KanburR.MaloneD. & MedhoraR. (Eds.), International development. Ideas, experience, and prospects (pp. 714–731). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
LundvallB. A. (1992). Introduction. In LundvallB. A. (Ed.), National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 1–16). London, UK: Pinter.
25.
LundvallB. A. (2010). Postscript: Innovation system research—Where it comes from and where it might go. In LundvallB. A. (Ed.), National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 317–366). London, UK: Anthem Press.
26.
MannM. (1986). The sources of social power: A history of power from the beginning to AD 1760 (Vol. I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MannM. (1993). The sources of social power: The rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914 (Vol. II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MannM. (2012). The sources of social power: Global empires and revolution, 1890–1945 (Vol. III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MannM. (2013a). The sources of social power: Globalizations, 1945–2011 (Vol. IV). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
MannM. (2013b). The end may be nigh, but for whom? In WallersteinI.CollinsR.MannM.DerluguianG. & CalhounC. (Eds.), Does capitalism have a future? (pp. 71–97). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
MazzucatoM. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. London, UK: Anthem Press.
32.
McNeillJ. R. & EngelkeP. (2014). The great acceleration. An environmental history of the Anthropocene since 1945. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
33.
MertonR. (1968). The Matthew effect on science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.
34.
MokyrJ. (2002). The gifts of Athena. Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
MooreJ. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. London, UK: Verso.
36.
NussbaumM. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
OXFAM (2016). An economy for the 1%. How privilege and power in the economy drive extreme inequality and how this can be stopped. Oxford: Oxfam GB. ISBN 978-1-78077-993-5
38.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
39.
RamaniS. V. (2014). Concluding remarks. In RamaniS. V. (Ed.), Innovation in India. Combining economic growth with inclusive development (pp. 379–390). Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
40.
RoserM. (2015a). Life expectancy. Retrieved from http://ourworldindata.org/data/population-growth-vital-statistics/life-expectancy/
41.
RoserM. (2015b). Literacy. Retrieved from http://ourworldindata.org/data/education-knowledge/literacy/
42.
ScheidelW. (2017). The great leveler. Violence and the history of inequality from the stone age to the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
SchotJ. & KangerL. (2018). Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. Research Policy, 47(6), 1045–1059.
44.
SchroederR. (2007). Rethinking science, technology, and social change. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
SenA. (1999) Development as freedom. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
46.
SenA. (2013). The ends and means of sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 6–20.
47.
SrinivasS. & SutzJ. (2008). Developing countries and innovation: Searching for a new analytical approach. Technology in Society, 30(2), 129–140.
48.
StiglitzJ. (2012). The price of inequality. New York, NY: Norton.
49.
StiglitzJ.SenA. & FitoussiJ. P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. New York, NY: The New Press.
50.
The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index (2015). Democracy in an age of anxiety. Retrieved from http://www.yabiladi.com/img/content/EIU-Democracy-Index-2015.pdf
51.
TillyC. (2005). Identities, boundaries, and social ties. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
52.
UNDP (2011). Human development report 2011, sustainability and equity: A better future for all. New York, NY: United Nations Development Program.
