This article tends to suggest that the strategy of embracing globalization has been helpful in raising GDP growth in China and India. The higher growth record also coincided with increasing income inequality, wealth inequality and regional inequality. While China seems to have made some success in making a turnaround in inequality, in India inequalities are on the rise. The present study attributes the observed trend to the nature of structural change and the resultant employment generation in terms of both its quantity and its quality. FDI and trade under globalization also worked towards increasing inequalities. The key issue is why globalization as implemented in India failed to generate employment unlike what happened in China. India seems to have been not adequately successful in globalizing at ‘our terms and at our own pace’, whereas China has been able to successfully manage its transition to the global market, which in turn, at least partly, explains the observed differences in the trend in growth and inequality in these two countries. At the same time, while there have been targeted and effective policy measures in China to address inequalities, in India, such policies are yet to show up their results.
AhluwaliaM. S. (2000). Economic performance of states in post-reforms period. Economic & Political Weekly, 35(19), 1637–1648.
2.
AhluwaliaM. S. (2002). State level performance under economic reforms in India. In KruegerA. (Ed.), Economic policy reforms and the Indian economy (pp. 91–128). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2012). Asian development outlook 2012: Confronting rising inequality in Asia. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/2012/ado2012.pdf
4.
AtkinsonA. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244–263.
5.
AtkinsonA. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6.
BalakrishnanP., GolaitR., & KumarP. (2008). Agricultural growth in India since 1991, Study 27. Mumbai: Development Research Group, Reserve Bank of India.
7.
BanerjeeA., & PikettyT. (2005). Are the rich growing richer: Evidence from Indian tax data. In DeatonA. & KozelV. (Eds.), The Great Indian poverty debate (pp. 520–529). Delhi: Macmillan.
8.
ChenS., & RavallionM. (2008). The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 4703). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
9.
DaviesJ. B., ShorrocksA., SandstromS., & WolffE. N. (2007). The world distribution of household wealth. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Global, International and Regional Studies.
10.
DeatonA., & DrezeJ. (2002). Poverty and inequality in India: A re-examination. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(36), 3729–3748.
11.
DornbuschR. (1992). The case for trade liberalization in developing countries. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(1), 69–85.
12.
ErnstD., & LundvallB.A. (2000). Information technology in learning economy: challenges for developing countries. East-West Center working papers, Economic Series No 8. Honolulu, Hawaii.
13.
FelipeJ., LanzafameM., & ZhuangJ. (2014). The People’s Republic of China’s potential growth rate: The long-run constraints (Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series, No. 418). Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
FreemanC. (2011). Technology, inequality and economic growth. Innovation and Development, 1(1), 11–25.
16.
GuS., & LundvallB. Å. (2006). Introduction: China’s innovation system and the move towards harmonious growth and endogenous innovation. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 8(1–2), 1–26.
17.
HarilalK. N., KanjiN., JeyaranjanJ., EapenM., & SwaminathanP. (2006). Power in global value chains: Implications for employment and livelihoods in the cashew nut industry in India. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
18.
JayadevA., MotiramS., & VakulabharanamV. (2007). Patterns of wealth disparities in India during the liberalisation era. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(39), 3853–3863.
19.
JosephK. J. (2013). Has trade been an engine of inclusive growth? India’s experience under globalization. Millennial Asia, 4(2), 135–157.
20.
JosephK. J., & KakarlapudiK. K. (2014) Innovation and development in India: Changing paradigms and trajectories. In GoyalA. (Ed.), Handbook on Indian economy for the 21 century (pp. 793–823). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
21.
KakarlapudiK. K. (2010). Skill-biased technology and wage inequality: Evidence from Indian manufacturing under globalisation (MPhil dissertation). Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum.
22.
KanburR., & WagstaffA. (2015). How useful is inequality of opportunity as a policy construct?London, UK: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
23.
KanburR., & ZhangX. (2005). Fifty years of regional inequality in China: A journey through central planning, reform, and openness. Review of Development Economics, 9(1), 87–106.
24.
KannanK. P., & RaveendranG. (2009). Growth sans employment: A quarter century of jobless growth in India’s organised manufacturing. Economic & Political weekly, XLIV(10), 80–91.
25.
KaplinskyR. (2000). Globalisation and unequalisation: What can be learned from value chain analysis?Journal of Development Studies, 37(2), 117–146.
26.
KaplinskyR., MemedovicO., MorrisM., & ReadmanJ. (2003). The global wood furniture value chain: What prospects for upgrading by developing countries (UNIDO Sectoral Studies Series Working Paper). Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
27.
KarS., & SakthivelS. (2007). Reforms and regional inequality in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(47), 69–77.
28.
KnightJ. (2013). Inequality in China: An overview (Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6482). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
29.
KuznetsS. (1963). Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations: VIII. Distribution of income by size. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 11(2, Part 2), 1–80.
30.
LewisW. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191.
31.
LewisW. A. (1978). The Evolution of the International Economic Order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
32.
LucasR. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.
33.
NagarajR., VaroudakisA., & VeganzonesM. (1998). Long-run growth trends and convergence across Indian states (Technical Paper, No 131). Paris: OECD Development Centre.
34.
NayyarD. (2006). Globalisation, history and development: A tale of two centuries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(1), 137–159.
35.
NayyarD. (2007). Development through globalization? In MavrotasG. & ShorrocksA. (Eds.), Advancing development (pp. 593–613). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
NayyarD. (2014). Why employment matters: Reviving growth and reducing inequality. International Labour Review, 153(3), 351–364.
37.
NeethiP (2008). Contract work in the organised manufacturing sector: A disaggregated analysis of trends and their patterns. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 51(4), 559–573.
38.
PapolaT. S., & SahuP. P. (2012). Growth and structure of employment in India: Long term and post reform performance and the emerging challenge. New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
39.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
40.
RainaR. S. (2011). Institutional strangleholds: Agricultural science and the state in India. In NarayanaD. & MahadevanR. (Eds.), Shaping India—Economic change in historical perspective (pp. 99–123). New Delhi: Routledge.
41.
RaoM. G., ShandR. T., & KalirajanK. P. (1999). Convergence of incomes across Indian states: A divergent view. Economic & Political Weekly, 34(13), 769–778.
42.
RavallionM., & ChenS. (2007). China’s (uneven) progress against poverty. Journal of Development Economics, 82(1), 1–42.
43.
ReddyD. N., & MishraS. (Eds.) (2010). Agrarian crisis in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
44.
SenA. (1973). On economic inequality. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
45.
SenA. (1983). Development: Which way now?The Economic Journal, 93(372), 745–762.
46.
SenA. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny. Social Development Papers No. 1. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
47.
SenA. K. (1997). From income inequality to economic inequality. Southern Economic Journal, 64(2), 384–401.
48.
SenA., & Himanshu (2004). Poverty and inequality in India: II: Widening disparities during the 1990s. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(38), 4361–4375.
49.
ShettyS. L. (2003). Growth of SDP and structural changes in state economies: Interstate comparisons. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(49), 5189–5200.
50.
ShiL. (2016). Recent changes in income inequality in China. In The Institute of Development Studies (IDS) World Social science report: Challenging inequalities pathways to a just world (pp 83–88). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural, Organization (UNESCO).
51.
ShorrocksA. F. (1978). Income inequality and income mobility. Journal of Economic Theory, 19(2), 376–393.
52.
ShorrocksA. F. (1983). Ranking income distributions. Economica, 50(197), 3–17.
53.
ShorrocksA. F. (1984). Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(6), 1369–1385.
54.
ShorrocksA., & Van der HoevenR. (2004). Growth, inequality, and poverty: Prospects for pro-poor economic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
SinghL., & ShergillB. S. (2015). Technological capability, employment growth and industrial development: A quantitative anatomy of Indian scenario. In SinghL., JosephK. J. & JohnsonD. N. (Eds.), Technology, innovations and economic development (pp. 238–271). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
56.
SpenceM. (2008). The growth report: Strategies for sustained growth and inclusive development. Washington, DC: Commission on Growth and Development Final Report.
57.
StiglitzJ. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
58.
StiglitzJ. E. (2013). The price of inequality. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
59.
SubramanianS., & JayarajD. (2006). The distribution of household wealth in India. Helsinki: United Nations University-World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER).
60.
SubramanianS., & JayarajD. (2015). Growth and inequality in the distribution of India’s consumption expenditure: 1983 to 2009–10. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(32), 39–47.
61.
SuisseC. (2015). Global wealth databook. Retrieved from https://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/?fileID=F2425415-DCA7-80B8-EAD989AF9341D47E
62.
SundaramK., & TendulkarS. D. (2003a). Poverty in India in the 1990s: An analysis of changes in 15 major states. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(14), 1385–1393.
63.
SundaramK., & TendulkarS. D. (2003b). Poverty has declined in the 1990s: A resolution of comparability problems in NSS consumer expenditure data. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(4), 327–337.
64.
UmaS, JosephK. J., & AbrahamV. (2010). Impact of trade liberalization on employment: The experience of India’s manufacturing industries. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 16(4), 792–814.
65.
United Nations (2015). The millennium development goals report. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20rev%20(July%201).pdf
66.
WanG. (2007). Understanding regional poverty and inequality trends in China: Methodological issues and empirical findings. Review of Income and Wealth, 53(1), 25–34.
67.
WanG., & ZhouZ. (2005). Income inequality in rural China: Regression-based decomposition using household data. Review of Development Economics, 9(1), 107–120.
68.
XieY., & ZhouX. (2014). Income inequality in today’s China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(19), 6928–6933.
69.
ZhangX., & ZhangK. H. (2003). How does globalisation affect regional inequality within a developing country? Evidence from China. Journal of Development Studies, 39(4), 47–67.
70.
ZhouY., & SongL. (2016). Income inequality in China: Causes and policy responses. China Economic Journal, 9(2), 186–208.
