This study investigates how increased news media use corresponds to an increasing consensus among different subgroups in society regarding social issues (first level of agenda-setting) and consensus on the attributes of the terrorism issue (second level of agenda-setting). With its cross-sectional design, the study, includes a content analysis of three leading newspapers and three television channels, coupled with a systematic random sample survey of the audience. Results indicated that news media use and consensus-building studies regarding an agenda of important issues confronting the community were not replicated within the Pakistani public. In contrast, the pattern of increased news media use and consensus on the attributes of the terrorism issue was strongly replicated in Pakistan. The findings further showed that news media reduced differences among divergent demographic subgroups and contributed to how these groups think about and understand issues. It was concluded that news media, by emphasising certain aspects of terrorism, contributed to the development of social consensus among diversified segments of a population concerning to their opinion about different aspects of terrorism. Thus, the media must be free of political and ideological pressures to act as a pluralistic platform to form an informed public opinion.
BaumannH. C., ZhengP., & McCombsM. (2017). First and second-level agenda-setting in the 2014 Indian general election: A time-series analysis of party-media relation. Asian Journal of Communication, 28(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1390773
2.
BehrR. L., & IyengarS. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/268900
3.
BetusA. E., KearnsE. M., & LemieuxA. F. (2021). How perpetrator identity (sometimes) influences media framing attacks as ‘terrorism’ or ‘mental illness’. Communication Research, 48(8), 1133–1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220971142
4.
CeronA., CuriniL., & IacusS. M. (2016). First and second-level agenda setting in the Twittersphere: An application to the Italian political debate. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(2), 159–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266
5.
ChaudhryN. I., & AshrafA. (2012). Agenda setting and framing of elections during Musharraf period in Pakistani Print Media (1999–2008). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(17), 274–282.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
7.
DuY. R., & WongJ. (2013). Greater newspaper use increases agreement on public issues. Newspaper Research Journal, 34(3), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953291303400305
8.
DownsA. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The ‘issue-attention cycle’. Public Interest, 28, 38–40.
9.
Gallup. (2014). Contemporary media use in Pakistan. https://www.usagm.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Pakistan-research-brief-FINAL.pdf
10.
GhanemS. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda-setting. InMcCombsM. E., ShawD. L., & WeaverD. H.(Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Erlbaum.
11.
HayesA. F., & KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89.
12.
HigginsV. D. M. (2009). News media roles in bridging communities: Consensus function of agenda-setting [unpublished PhD Thesis]. The University of Texas at Austin.
13.
HussainS., & SirajS. A. (2018). Coverage of Taliban conflict in the Pak–Afghan press: A comparative analysis. International Communication Gazette, 81(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518817649
14.
JiD., HuZ., & MuhammadY. (2016). Neighboring competitor? Indian image in Chinese media. Global Media and China, 1(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416668186
15.
KhanA., RehmanH., & KhanF. R. (2020). Reporting insurgencies in South Asia: A peace journalism perspective. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 555–568.
16.
KiousisS., BantimaroudisP., & BanH. (1999). Candidate image attributes: Experiments on the substantive dimension of second-level agenda-setting. Communication Research, 26(4), 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004003
17.
LasswellH. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. InSchramW.(Ed.), Mass communication. University of Illinois Press.
18.
López-EscobarE., & SádabaT. (2017). Agenda-setting: Second-level perspective and cognitive versus persuasive effects. InRosslerP.(Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–9). John Willy & Sons Inc.
19.
López-EscobarE., LlamasJ. P., & McCombsM. (1998). Agenda setting and community consensus: First and second level effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/10.4.335
20.
MalikJ. K. (2014). Media agenda-setting of important national issues and their rankings of students of Pakistani university (unpublished MPhil Thesis). University of the Punjab, Lahore.
21.
McCombsM. E. (1997). Building consensus: The news media’s agenda-setting roles. Political Communication, 14(4), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846097199236
22.
McCombsM. E.(Ed.). (2004). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. John Wiley & Sons.
23.
McCombsM. E.(Ed.). (2014). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
24.
McCombsM. E., & ShawD. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
25.
McCombsM. E., & ShawD. L. (1976). Structuring the unseen environment. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01374.x
26.
McCombsM., & ValenzuelaS. (2021). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
27.
McCombsM., López-EscobarE., & LlamasJ. P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02842.x
28.
McCombsM. E., ShawD. L., & WeaverD. H.(Eds.). (1997). Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
McQuailD. (1987). Mass communication theory: An introduction. SAGE Publications.
30.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
31.
NorrisP., KernM., & JustM. (2003). The lessons of framing terrorism. InNorrisP., KernM., & JustM.(Eds.), Framing terrorism, the news media, the government and the public (pp. 281–302). Routledge.
32.
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS). (2019). Social and culture. https://www.pbs.gov.pk/
33.
PintakL., BoweB. J., & NazirS. J. (2018). Mediatization in Pakistan: Perceptions of media influence on a fragile democracy. Journalism, 19(7), 934–958.
34.
PittsL. (2001, December17). Objectivity might be impossible, so we strive for fairness. Austin American-Statesman, p. A13.
35.
RasulA., & McDowellS. D. (2012). Consolidation in the name of regulation: The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) and the concentration of media ownership in Pakistan. Global Media Journal, 11(21).
36.
RasulA., RobinsonB. C., & McDowellS. D. (2016). The Taliban factor: Conflict in Afghanistan and elite South Asian newspapers. The Journal of International Communication, 22(2), 273–292.
37.
RiazS. (2008). Agenda-setting role of mass media. Global Media Journal, 1(2).
38.
ShahM. H., YaqoubM., KausarS., & KumarA. (2016). Correlation between newspapers’ agenda and public agenda on national issues during general elections 2013 in Pakistan. International Journal of Journalism and Communication, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijjc.20160101.12
39.
ShawD. L., & MartinS. E. (1992). The function of the mass media agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900410
40.
ShawD. L., & McCombsM. E. (1977). The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press. West Publishing Company.
41.
TakeshitaT. (1997). Exploring the media’s roles in defining reality: From issue-agenda-setting to attribute-agenda-setting. InMcCombsM. E., ShawD. L., & WeaverD. H.(Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting (pp. 15–28). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
42.
VuH. T., McCombsM., RussellA., & PainP. (2020). Deepening the concept of ‘compelling arguments’: Linking substantive and affective dimensions of attributes in assessing the effects of climate change news on public opinion. The Agenda Setting Journal, 4(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.19009.vu
43.
YousafM. (2018). News media roles in bridging gap of our society: Consensus function of agenda setting [unpublished PhD Thesis]. Communication University of China, Beijing.
44.
YousafM., LiW., & YousafZ. (2020). The news media exposure and polarization of public opinion regarding a health issue: The limits of social functions of agenda-setting. Global Media Journal, 35(1), 31–51.
45.
YousafM., RahmanB. H., & YousafZ. (2020). Constructing reality: Framing of the Kashmir conflict in dictatorial and democratic regimes in the Pakistani English press. Media Watch, 11(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.15655/mw/2020/v11i3/203045
46.
ZaheerL. (2016). War or peace journalism: Comparative analysis of Pakistan’s English and Urdu media coverage of Kashmir conflict. South Asian Studies, 31(2).
47.
ZhuJ. H. (1992). Issue competition and attention distraction: A zero-sum theory of agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900403
