Urban mobility has significant impact and influence on communities and economies, facilitating interconnection of individuals with one another and with their places of work, learning and recreation. Greater usage of sustainable public transport requires seamless access to and egress from mass transit. In Indian cities, this access is provided by paratransit/intermediate public transport (IPT) vehicles such as electric rickshaws (e-rickshaws). With e-rickshaws contributing significantly to sustainable urban mobility, this study assesses the service quality of e-rickshaws in Delhi on eight parameters, comprising 23 ‘modified’ attributes using importance–performance analysis (traditional and confidence interval based) (IPA), gap analysis and Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI). The study concludes that the following service components need to be focussed on: level of emissions, noise pollution and sight pollution caused by the paratransit mode; cleanliness inside the paratransit vehicle; overall safety from road accidents; quality and condition of vehicle and of the material inside the vehicle; and ease of tracking the paratransit mode using an app.
AbhyankarN., GopalA., SheppardC., ParkW. Y., & PhadkeA. (2017). Techno-economic assessment of deep electrification of passenger vehicles in India. International Energy Analysis Berkeley Lab. https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl-1007121_report_1.pdf
2.
CaesaronD., MakapeduaJ., & LukodonoR. P. (2021). Evaluation of online-based ride-hailing services using service quality (Servqual) method, refined Kano Model, importance performance analysis (IPA), and quality function deployment (QFD): A case study of grab bike Indonesia. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 12(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v12i2.6790
3.
CerveroR. (2000). Informal transport in the developing world. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat). https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager-files/Informal%20Transport%20in%20the%20Developing%20World.pdf
4.
DanielsM. L., & MarionJ. L. (2006). Visitor evaluations of management actions at a highly impacted Appalachian Trail camping area. Environmental Management, 38, 1006–1019.
5.
DasD., & MandalP. (2021). Comparative evaluation of commuters’ preferences and expectations for sharing auto-rickshaw. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(4), 1567–1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.08.006
6.
Dell’OlioL., IbeasA., & CecınP. (2010). Modelling user perception of bus transit quality. Transport Policy, 17, 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.006
7.
Dell’OlioL., IbeasA., & CecınP. (2011). The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transport Policy, 18, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.005
8.
De SotoH. (1989). Other path—The invisible revolution in the Third World. Harper & Row.
9.
EboliL., & MazzullaG. (2007). Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 10(3), 21–34. http://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.10.3.2
10.
EboliL., & MazzullaG. (2009). A new customer satisfaction index for evaluating transit service quality. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(3), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.12.3.2
11.
FalcocchioJ. (1979). A methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of transportation improvements for the elderly and handicapped. U. S. Department of Transportation.
12.
GoelR., & TiwariG. (2016). Access–egress and other travel characteristics of metro users in Delhi and its satellite cities. International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences Research, 39(2), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2015.10.001
13.
GrimmJ. (2024). Dial-a-ride problems in transportation service. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66346-8
14.
Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. (2011). Report on Indian urban infrastructure and services. https://icrier.org/pdf/FinalReport-hpec.pdf
15.
JoewonoT. B., & KubotaH. (2007a). Exploring negative experiences and user loyalty in paratransit. Transportation Research Board, 2034(1), 134–142. https://doi/abs/10.3141/2034-15
16.
JoewonoT. B., & KubotaH. (2007b). User satisfaction with paratransit in competition with motorization in Indonesia: Anticipation of future implications. Transportation, 34, 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9119-7
17.
KarM., SadhukhanS., & ParidaM. (2022). Assessing commuters’ perceptions towards improvement of intermediate public transport as access modes to metro stations. Transport Policy, 129, 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.011
18.
KnutssonS. (2000). Valuing rider quality attributes in the Swedish special transport services. 2nd KFB Research Conference, Department of Technology and Society, Lund University, Sweden.
19.
LaveR., & MathiasR. (2000). State of the art of paratransit. Transportation Research Board. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/millennium/00107.pdf
20.
LevineD. M., StephanD., KrehbielT. C., & BerensonM. L. (2005). Statistics for managers using Microsoft Excel (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.
21.
MartillaJ. A., & JamesJ. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495
22.
Ministry of Law and Justice. (2015). Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act 2015. https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/acts_parliament/2015/the-motor-vehicles-(amendment)-act,-2015.pdf
23.
MulleyC., & NelsonJ. D. (2009). Flexible transport services: A new market opportunity for public transport. Research in Transport Economics, 25(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2009.08.008
24.
Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. (2011). Census of India, 2011. Ministry of Home Affairs, India.
25.
O’NeillA. (2023). Urbanization in India 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/271312/urbanization-in-india/
26.
OrskiC. K. (1975). Paratransit: The coming of age of a transportation concept. Transportation, 4, 329–334.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174734
27.
PaganoA. M., & McKnightC. E. (1983). Quality of service in special service para-transit: The users’ perspective. Transportation Research Record, 934, 14–23
28.
PanditD., & DasS. (2013). A framework for determining commuter preference along a proposed bus rapid transit corridor. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.184
29.
ParasuramanA., BerryL., & ZeithamlV. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring customer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 26–43.
30.
ParasuramanA., ZeithamlV., & BerryL. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implication for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50.
31.
PhunV. K., & YaiT. (2016). State of the art of paratransit literatures in Asian developing countries. Asian Transport Studies, 4(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.11175/eastsats.4.57
32.
PriyeS., & ManojM. (2020). Passengers’ perceptions of safety in paratransit in the context of three-wheeled electric rickshaws in urban India. Safety Science, 124(104591). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104591
33.
RahmanF. (2022). Exploring paratransit service quality based on low-income women’s perception: A case study in Dhaka city by structural equation model (SEM). IATSS Research, 46(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.11.009
34.
RathoreM. (2024). Rural and urban population in India 2018–2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/621507/rural-and-urban-population-india/
ShandilyaN., SainiV., & GhorpadeA. R. (2019). Handbook: E-rickshaws deployment in Indian cities. ICLEI South Asia.
37.
SharmaD., PanditD., & BoseT. (2020). Determination of service quality attributes based on user perception for paratransit services in developing country like India. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 3577–3594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.093
38.
ShiehJ. I., & WuH. H. (2009). Applying importance-performance analysis to compare the changes of a convenient store. Quality and Quantity, 43, 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9111-5
39.
ShimazakiT., & RahmanM. M. (1995). Operational characteristics of paratransit in developing countries of Asia. Transportation Research Record, 1503, 49–56.
40.
StathopoulosA., & MarcucciE. (2014). Special issue on measuring service quality and local public transport performance. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.758449
41.
Statista Research Department. (2024). Global megacity populations 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/912263/population-of-urban-agglomerations-worldwide/
42.
Tejas GhateA., & SunejaD. (2018). The E-rickshaw story: Was the advent of electric mobility in India planned. https://www.teriin.org/blog/e-rickshaw-story-was-advent-of-electric-mobility-in-India-planned
43.
UN Habitat. (2013). Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility: Global Report on Human Settlements 2013. Taylor & Francis.
44.
UN Habitat. (2022). World cities report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf
45.
United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision highlights. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf
46.
United Nations. (2016). Sustainable transport. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/sustainabletransport
47.
VasudevanV., AgarwalaR., & DashS. (2021). Is vehicle ownership in urban India influenced by the availability of high quality dedicated public transit systems?IATSS Research, 45(3), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.12.005
48.
World Bank Group. (2023). Urban development. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overview#:~:text=Today%2C%20some%2056%25%20of%20the,people%20will%20live%20in%20cities
49.
WuH. H. & ShiehJ. I. (2009). The development of a confidence interval-based importance-performance analysis by considering variability in analyzing service quality. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7040–7044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.055
