This article proposes that the concept of depoliticization can be usefully employed to facilitate our understanding of the components of urban governance networks. It first defines the concept of depoliticization and then proposes a model to operationalize this concept for usage in concrete field situations. It outlines this concept with reference to the concepts of politicization and politics and identifies its different tactics. The article also provides a review of the authors who have worked with this framework, specifically in the field of development studies, and highlights the importance of this concept in facilitating our understanding of governance, especially in the urban development projects working in democratic societies.
BlühdornI. (2007). The third transformation of democracy: On the efficient management of late modern complexity. In BlühdornI.JunU. (Eds), Economic efficiency—Democratic empowerment: Contested modernization in Britian and Germany. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield/ Lexington.
4.
BoggsC. (2000). The end of politics. New York: Guildford Press.
5.
BriggM. (2002). Post-development, Foucault and the colonization metaphor. Third World Quarterly, 23(3), 421–36.
6.
BryldErik. (2000). The technocratic discourse: Technical means to political problems, Development in Practice, 10(5[November]), 700–5.
7.
BullerJ.FlindersM. (2005). The domestic origins of depoliticisation in the area of British economic policy, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(4), 526–543.
8.
BurnhamP. (2001). New labour and the politics of depoliticisation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3(2), 127–49.
9.
CampbellJ. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
10.
ChhotrayV. (2007). The ‘anti-politics machine’ in India: Depoliticisation through local institution building for par-ticipatory watershed development. Journal of Development Studies, 43(6), 1037–56.
11.
CorbridgeS.KumarS. (2002). Programmed to fail? Development projects and the politics of participation. Journal of Development Studies, 39(2), 73–104.
12.
DouglasM. (1999). The depoliticization of risk in implicit meanings. London: Routledge.
13.
EversH.D.GerkeS. (2009). Knowledge is power: Experts as a strategic group. ZEFWorking Paper Series-8a, ZEF, Bonn.
14.
FergusonJ. (1990). The anti-politics machine: Development, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. London, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
FineB. (1999). The developmental state is dead—Long live social capital?Development and Change, 30(1), 1–19.
16.
FlindersM. (2007). Delegated governance and the British state—Walking without order. London: Oxford University Press.
17.
FlindersM.BullerJ. (2006). Depoliticization, democracy and arena shifting. In LaegreidP.ChristensenT (Eds), Autonomy and regulation—Coping with agencies in the modern state (pp. 293–318). London: Edward Elgar.
18.
GordonC. (ed.). (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings by Michael Foucault. New York: Pantheon Books.
19.
HabermasJ. (1962). The structural transformation of the public-sphere. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Publications.
20.
HarrissJ. (2001). Depoliticizing development—The World Bank and social capital. London: Anthem Press.
21.
HayC. (2007). Why we hate politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
HodgsonG.M. (2001). How economics forgot history: The problem of historical specificity in social science. London: Routledge.
23.
KavirajS. (1988). Critique of the passive revolution. Economic and Political Weekly, 23(45/47), 2429–44.
24.
KerkvlietB.J. (1990). Everyday politics in the Philippines: Class and status relations in a central Luzon village. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
KohliA. (Ed.). (1988). India’s democracy: Analysis of changing state–society relations. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
26.
LeftwichA. (1983). Redefining politics: People, resources and power. London: Methuen.
27.
LeftwichA. (Ed.). (1996). Democracy and development. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
LeftwichA. (2007). The political approach to institutional formation, maintenance and change—A literature review essay. Discussion Paper Series No. 14, School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester.
29.
MollingaPeter P.BoldingA. (Eds). (2004). The politics of irrigation reform—Contested policy formulation and implementation in Asia, Africa and Latin America. London: Ashgate.
30.
MosseD. (2004). Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change, 35(4), 639–71.
31.
NorthD. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. London: Cambridge University Press.
