This article estimates the effect of transport infrastructure at country level, on employment, productivity (total factor productivity (TFP), and their components technical efficiency–pure and the scale—and technological change) and economic growth, using a dynamic panel approach. We focus on two broad categories of transport infrastructure: (1) road density and (2) road paved. Using dynamic panel GMM system estimation, we find positive effects of road density and road paved on total factor productivity (TFP) in countries with middle low and low income (using parametric and non-parametric estimations). On the other hand, and taking into account the Deng’s hypothesis of a nonlinearity relationship between transport infrastructure and economic growth (Deng, 2013, Transport Reviews 33(6): 686–99), we found empirical evidence about a Kuznets curve when we consider the percentage of roads paved. In countries with middle low and low income, we also found a Kuznets curve between road density and unemployment.
ArellanoM.BondS.1991. ‘Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.’ The Review of Economic Studies58(2): 277–97.
2.
AschauerD. A.1989. ‘Is Public Expenditure Productive?.’ Journal of Monetary Economics23(2): 177–200.
3.
BanisterD.BerechmanY.2001. ‘Transport Investment and the Promotion of Economic Growth.’ Journal of Transport Geography9(3): 209–18.
4.
BañosJ.GonzálezP.MayorM.2013. Productivity and Accessibility of Road Transport Infrastructure in Spain: A Spatial Econometric Approach. Working Paper. Spain: University of Oviedo.
5.
BerechmanJ.PaaswellR.2001. ‘Accessibility Improvements and Local Employment: An Empirical Analysis.’ Journal of Transportation and Statistics4(2/3): 49–66.
6.
BilsM.KlenowP. J.2000. ‘Does Schooling Cause Growth?’The American Economic Review91(4): 1006–30.
7.
BoopenS.2006. ‘Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Evidence from Africa Using Dynamic Panel Estimates.’ The Empirical Economics Letters5(1): 37–52.
8.
CantosP.Gumbau-AlbertM.MaudosJ.2005. ‘Transport Infrastructures, Spillover Effects and Regional Growth: Evidence of the Spanish Case.’ Transport Reviews25(1): 25–50.
9.
ChanC.ForwoodD.RoperH.SayerC.2009. Public Infrastructure Financing: An International Perspective. Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper. Adelaide, Australia: Australian Government Productivity Commission.
10.
CraftsN.2009. ‘Transport Infrastructure Investment: Implications for Growth and Productivity.’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy25(3): 327–43.
11.
CzernichN.FalckO.KretschmerT.WoessmannL.2011. ‘Broadband Infrastructure and Economic Growth.’ The Economic Journal121(552): 505–32.
12.
DavisonA. C.HinkleyD. V.1997. Bootstrap Methods and Their Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DemetriadesP. O.MamuneasT. P.2000. ‘Intertemporal Output and Employment Effects of Public Infrastructure Capital: Evidence from 12 OECD Economies.’ The Economic Journal110(465): 687–712.
14.
DengT.2013. ‘Impacts of Transport Infrastructure on Productivity and Economic Growth: Recent Advances and Research Challenges.’ Transport Reviews33(6): 686–99.
15.
DuggalV. G.SaltzmanC.KleinL. R.1999. ‘Infrastructure and Productivity: A Nonlinear Approach.’ Journal of Econometrics92(1): 47–74.
16.
ÉgertB.KoźlukÉ. B.SutherlandD.2009. Infrastructure and Growth: Empirical Evidence. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 685. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
17.
FanS.Chan-KangC.2005. Road Development, Economic Growth, and Poverty Reduction in China (No. 12). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
18.
FäreR.GrosskopfS.RoosP.1998. ‘Malmquist Productivity Indexes: A Survey of Theory and Practice.’ In Index Numbers: Essays in Honour of Sten Malmquist: 127–190. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
19.
FayM.MorrisonM.2007. Infrastructure in Latin America and the Caribbean: Recent Developments and Key Challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
20.
Fernandez-AriasE.2014. Productivity and Factor Accumulation in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Database (2014 Update). Washington DC: Research Department, Inter American Development Bank.
21.
GibbonsS.LyytikäinenT.OvermanH.Sanchis-GuarnerR.2012. New Road Infrastructure: The Effects on Firms. SERC Discussion Paper 117. London, UK: London School of Economics.
22.
HansenL. P.1982. ‘Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators.’ Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society: 1029–1054.
23.
HaynesK. E.1997. ‘Labor Markets and Regional Transportation Improvements: The Case of High-speed Trains an Introduction and Review’. The Annals of Regional Science31(1): 57–76.
24.
HsiaoC.1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
25.
JudgeG. G.HillR. C.GriffithsW. ELütkepohlH.LeeT.1988. Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. 2nd Eds.New York, USA: John Wiley.
26.
MeloP. C.GrahamD. J.Brage-ArdaoR.2013. ‘The Productivity of Transport Infrastructure Investment: A Meta-analysis of Empirical Evidence.’ Regional Science and Urban Economics43(5): 695–706.
27.
QueirozC. A.GautamS.1992. Road Infrastructure and Economic Development: Some Diagnostic Indicators (Vol. 921). Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
28.
QueirozC.HaasR.CaiY.1994. ‘National Economic Development and Prosperity Related to Paved Road Infrastructure.’ Transportation Research Record1455: 147.
29.
RietveldP.1989. ‘Employment Effects of Changes in Transportation Infrastructure: Methodological Aspects of the Gravity Model.’ In Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 66, No. 1, 19–30. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
30.
SchwartzJ.AndresL.DragoiuG.2009. ‘Crisis in Latin America Infrastructure Investment, Employment and the Expectations of Stimulus.’ Journal of Infrastructure Development1(2): 111–31.
31.
StephanA.1997. The Impact of Road Infrastructure on Productivity and Growth: Some Preliminary Results for the German Manufacturing Sector. No. FS IV 97-47. Discussion papers//WZB, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Forschungsschwerpunkt Marktprozeß und Unternehmensentwicklung.
32.
The World Bank. 2014. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
