Measurement of Accessibility and Its Applications

Abstract

Access to markets and social services is a major determinant of economic status and welfare. Measurement of access is therefore of great importance for policy analysis and planning of interventions. The objective of this article is to expose readers to a new way of measuring and visualising accessibility—a potential accessibility index—and its applications. This index gauges connectivity of a specific location to large cities while taking into account the population of the cities or other destinations of interest and the transportation facilities to reach them. The potential accessibility index is used in the empirical literature to test the hypotheses from the ‘New Economic Geography’ regarding the impact of market access on regional economic growth. Along with recent developments in poverty mapping, this index has also been used to investigate the spatial relationship between poverty and market access. Accessibility indexes are gradually gaining acknowledgement of policy makers and development practitioners as important monitoring instruments of development. For example, a rural access indicator is part of the results measurement system for the World Bank's International Development Association (IDA) programmes.

Keywords

Potential accessibility poverty mapping regional development road network JEL Classification: O18 JEL Classification: R12 JEL Classification: R52 JEL Classification: R58

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bigman, D. and U. Deichmann (2000), ‘Spatial Indicators of Access and Fairness for the Location of Public Facilities’, in D. Bigman and H. Fofack (eds), Geographical Targeting for Poverty Alleviation: Methodology and Applications. pp. 181–206, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Regional and Sectoral Studies .

BITS (Birla Institute of Technology and Science) (2004), ‘Proceedings of the Asia Regional Workshop on Improving Mobility for the Rural Poor’, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, PILANI & NFG Rajasthan.

Deichmann, U. (1997), Accessibility Indicators in GIS. Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, New York: United Nations Statistics Division .

Deichmann, U. , M. Fay , J. Koo and S. Lall (2004), ‘ Economic Structure, Productivity, and Infrastructure Quality in Southern Mexico ’, Annals of Regional Science, 38(3): 361–85 .

Elbers, C. , J.O. Lanjouw and P.F. Lanjouw (2003), ‘ Micro-Level Estimation of Poverty and Inequality ’, Econometrica, 71(1): 355–64 .

Evenett, S.J. and W. Keller (2002), ‘ On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation ’, Journal of Political Economy, 110(2): 281–316 .

Farrow, A. and A. Nelson (2001), ‘Accessibility Modelling in ArcView 3: An Extension for Computing Travel Time and Market Catchment Information’, Software Manual. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia . Available online at www.ciat.cgiar.org/access/pdf/ciat_access.pdf. accessed on 1 July 2009.

Geertman, S.C.M. and J.R.R. van Eck (1995), ‘ GIS and Models of Accessibility Potential: An Application in Planning ’, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(1): 67–80 .

Gibson, J. and D. McKenzie (2008), ‘ Using Global Positioning Systems in Household Surveys for Better Economics and Better Policy ’, World Bank Research Observer, 22(2): 217–41 .

10.

Goodall, B. (1987), Dictionary of Human Geography. Harmondsworth: Penguin .

11.

Hanson, G. (1998), ‘Market Potential, Increasing Returns and Geographic Concentration’, NBER Working Paper, Vol. 6429, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA .

12.

Henderson, V. , Z. Shalizi and A.J. Venables (2001), ‘ Geography and Development ’, Journal of Economic Geography, 1(1): 81–105 .

13.

ISCGM (2005), Sri Lanka Digital Map Data, International Steering Committee for Global Mapping , www.iscgm.org.

14.

Johnston, R. (1986), The Dictionary of Human Geography, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell .

15.

Krugman, P. (1999), ‘ The Role of Geography in Development ’, International Regional Science Review, 22(2): 142–61 .

16.

Lall, S.V. , H.G. Wang and U. Deichmann (forthcoming), ‘Infrastructure and City Competitiveness in India’, in Jo Beall , Basudeb Guha-Khasnobis and Ravi Kanbur (eds), Beyond the Tipping Point: Benefits and Challenges of Urbanization. UN WIDER, London School of Economics .

17.

Lall, S.V. , Z. Shalizi and U. Deichmann (2004), ‘ Agglomeration Economies and Productivity in Indian Industry ’, Journal of Development Economics, 73(2): 643–73 .

18.

Roberts, P. , K.C. Shyam and C. Rastogi (2006), ‘Rural Access Index: A Key Development Indicator’, Transport Papers TP-10, Transport Sector Board, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

19.

Sarkar, A.K. and M. Dash (2007), ‘Quantification of Accessibility and Prioritization of Villages for Local Level Planning’, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pune , processed.

20.

Spiekermann and Wegener (2007), ‘Update of Selected Potential Accessibility Indicators—Final Report’, Urban and Regional Research (S&W), RRG Spatial Planning and Geoinformation, ESPON . Available online at http://www.espon.eu/mmp/online/website/content/projects/947/1297/file_2724/espon_accessibility_update_2006_fr_070207.pdf, accessed on 1 July 2009.

21.

World Bank (2005), ‘A Poverty Map for Sri Lanka—Findings and Lessons’, Policy Note No. 35605, World Bank, Washington, D.C.