This article documents, for a neighbourhood in Ahmedabad, India, what would be involved for current occupants to regularise tenure and register legal title. We show that the process of clearing title can be expensive, fraught with risks and perhaps impossible to complete for either the current occupants or the owners of record. Staying on the land in their current ambiguous status seems viable for now, but investing in further development is very risky. We discuss these findings in the context of the debate about providing secure tenure to slum dwellers from two perspectives: (a) the practicality of providing legal tenure as part of neighbourhood upgrading programmes; (b) the impacts on the real estate market of a system that leaves many private plots, in slums or elsewhere, in legal limbo and difficult to develop—in essence an anti-commons. Both issues are of critical interest as India faces the challenge of urbanisation.
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC). (2005). Ahmedabad slum networking program: A partnership program of infrastructure and social development in slums of Ahmedabad city. Submission to Human Settlements Management Institute for the Dubai International Award for Best Practices to Improve the Living Environment
2.
AndersonJ. S. (1992). Lawyers and the making of English land law, 1832–1940. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
AngelS. (Ed.). (2006). Secure tenure in Latin America and the Caribbean: Regularization of informal urban settlements in Peru, Mexico and Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School.
4.
AngelS.ArcherR.TanphiphatS.WegelinE. (Eds). (1983). Land for housing the poor. Singapore: Select Books.
5.
AnnezP. C.BertaudA.BertaudM.-A.BhattB.BhattC.PatelB.PhatakV. (2012). Ahmedabad: More but different government for “slum free” and livable cities (Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6267). Washington, DC: World Bank.
6.
ArruñadaB. (2011). Property titling and conveyancing. In AyotteK.SmithH. E. (Eds), Research handbook on the economics of property law: Research handbooks in law and economics series (Chapter 12, pp. 237–256) [Series Editors: Richard Posner and Francesco Parisi]. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
7.
BallaneyS. (2008). The town planning mechanism in Gujarat, India. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
8.
BallaneyS.KoshyC. K.NohnM.PatelB. (2009). Reforming urban land management in Gujarat, India. Infrastructure Report 2009 (Chapter 23, pp. 176–189). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
9.
BanerjeeB. (2002). India. In Durand-LasserveA.RoystonL. (Eds), Holding their ground: Secure land tenure for the urban poor in developing countries (pp. 37–58). London: Earthscan.
10.
BertaudA. (1989, December21). The regulatory environment of urban land in Indonesia: Constraints imposed on the poor and impact of World Bank’s urban projects (Asia Technical Department Working Paper No. 7582). Washington, DC: World Bank.
11.
BradsherK.Thirani BagriN. (2013, September12). Real estate stunted by rupee’s fall. International Herald Tribune.
12.
DeiningerK.FederG. (2009, September24). Land registration, governance, and development: Evidence and implications for policy. World Bank Research Observer, 24(2), 233–266.
13.
DemsetzH. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. The American Economic Review, 57(2), 347–359.
14.
De SotoH. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York, NY: Basic Books.
15.
DoebeleW. (1983). Concepts of urban land tenure. In DunkerleyH. B.WhiteheadC. M. E. (Eds), Urban land policy: Issues and opportunities (pp. 63–107). Washington, DC: World Bank.
16.
Durand-LasserveA.RoystonL. (Eds). (2002). Holding their ground: Secure land tenure for the urban poor in developing countries. London: Earthscan.
17.
Durand-LasserveA.SelodH. (2009). The formalization of urban land tenure. In LallS. V.FreireM.YuenB.RajackR.HelluinJ.-J. (Eds), Developing countries in urban land markets: Improving land management for successful urbanization (pp. 110–132). Washington, DC: World Bank.
18.
FernandesE. (2011). Regularization of informal settlements in Latin America (Policy Focus Report Series). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Land Institute.
19.
FernandesE.VarleyA. (Eds). (1998). Illegal cities: Law and urban change in developing countries. London and New York, NY: Zed Books.
20.
FieldE. (2005). Property rights and investment in urban slums. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2–3), 279–290.
21.
HammamS. (2011). Housing matters. Mimeograph.
22.
HarloeM. (1990). Great Britain. In Van VlietW. (Ed.), International handbook of housing policies and practices (Chapter 2, pp. 85–125). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
23.
HellerM. A. (1998, January). The tragedy of the anticommons: Property in the transition from Marx to Markets. Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621–688.
24.
KerekesC. B.WilliamsonC. R. (2010, July). Property less in Peru, even with a government land title. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69(3).
25.
KunduA. (2002). Tenure security, housing investment and environmental improvement. In PayneG. (Ed.), Land rights and innovation, improving tenure security for the urban poor (Chapter 8, pp. 136–157). London: IDTG Publishing.
26.
MacedoJ. (2008). Urban land policy and new land tenure paradigms: Legitimacy vs. legality in Brazilian cities. Land Use Policy, 25(2), 259–270.
27.
McAuslanP. (1998). Urbanization, law and development: A record of research. In FernandesE.VarleyA. (Eds), Illegal cities: Law and urban change in developing countries (pp.18–52). London: Zed Books.
28.
McAuslanP. (2003). Bringing the law back in: Essays in land, law and development. Aldershot: Ashgate.
29.
OfferA. (1977). The origins of the law of property acts 1910–25. The Modern Law Review, 40(5), 505–522.
30.
PatelB.JoshiR.BallaneyS.NohnM. (2011). Slum planning schemes: A statutory framework for establishing secure tenure and improving living conditions in Indian slums. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 2(1), 45–75.
31.
PayneG. (2002). Introduction. In PayneG. (Ed.), Land rights and innovation, improving tenure security for the urban poor (pp. 3–22). London: IDTG Publishing.
32.
PayneG.Durand-LasserveA.RakodiC. (2007, June). Urban land titling programmes. In BrøtherM. E.SolbergJ.-A. (Eds), Legal empowerment—A way out of poverty (Issue 3, pp. 11–39). Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
33.
PrattS. (2009). Business valuation: Discounts and premiums (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
34.
RoyD. (1983). The supply of land for the slums of Calcutta. In AngelS.ArcherR.TanphiphatS.WegelinE. (Eds), Land for housing the poor (pp. 98–108). Singapore: Select Books.
35.
SpringE. (1977). Landowners, lawyers, and land law reform in nineteenthcentury England. The American Journal of Legal History, 21(1), 40–59.
36.
TurnerJ. F. C. (1968). Housing priorities, settlement patterns and urban development in modernizing countries. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34(6), 354–363.
37.
United Nations. (1996, June). Report of the United Nations conference on human settlements (Habitat II).
38.
World Bank. (1993). Housing: enabling markets to work. A World Bank policy paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
