The study was undertaken to examine the existence and the level of market integration among selected cowpea markets in Nigeria. Co-integration and Granger causality tests were used to measure market integration and leading markets between producing and consuming regions. Result of the co-integration test using Johansen likelihood procedure to determine the number of co-integrating relations indicates that the wholesale prices of brown cowpea in the selected markets in Nigeria are co-integrated. The pairwise Granger causality test shows that Umuahia–Monday, Umuahia–Giwa, Giwa–Bodija and Bodija–Giwa market pairs rejected the null hypothesis of no causaality. Moreover, there is a bidirectional Granger causality between Giwa and Bodija markets at 5 per cent significant level. Thus, Giwa and Bodija are the markets occupying the dominant position in the Nigerian brown cowpea price formation and transmission. Few of the markets are spatially linked by trade, so there is low market integration between the regional brown cowpea markets in Nigeria.
AdeneganK.O.AdeoyeI.B. (2011). Price analysis of Tomato in rural and urban retail markets of Oyo State. International Journal of Agricultural Economics & Rural Development, 4(2), 43–51.
2.
AfolamiC.A. (2001). Market integration and inter-temporal pricing efficiency for cowpeas in Nigeria. ASSET Series A, 1(2), 171–185.
3.
AkintundeO.K.AkinremiT.B.NwauwaL.O.E. (2012). Food grain marketing in Osun State, Nigeria: A study of long-run price integration. Continental Journal of Agricultural Economics, 6(1), 1–9.
4.
AlexanderC.WyethJ. (1994). Cointegration and market integration: An application to the Indonesian rice market. Journal of Development Studies, 30(2), 303–328.
5.
AscheF.BremnesH.WesselsC.R. (1999). Product aggregation, market integration, and relationship between prices: An application to world salmon markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(4), 568–581.
6.
BarrettC.B. (1996). Market analysis methods: Are our enriched toolkits well suited to enlivened markets?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 825–829.
7.
BaulchB. (1997). Testing food market integration revisited. Journal of Development Studies, 33(4), 512–534.
8.
BressaniR. (1985). Nutritive value of cowpea. In SinghS.R.RachieK.O. (Eds), Cowpea: Research, production and utilization (pp. 353–360). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
ChirwaE.W. (2007). Liberalization of food marketing and market integration in Malawi. Final report of an AERC sponsored research work Presented at the Biannual Economic Research Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya. 27May.
10.
DebaniyuI.F. YakubuUsmanC.J.KutigiR.IngyeI.Y. (2011). Cowpea marketing and consumer preference in Magama local government area of Niger State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences, 3(4), 79–87.
11.
EngleR.F.GrangerC.W. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(7), 251–276.
12.
FayeM. (1999). Senegal, Mauritania and Gambia trip report. Bean/Cowpea Collaboration Research Support Programme, Purdue University.
13.
FayeM. (2000). Summer Research Programme Trip Report to Senegal and Ivory-Coast. Bean/Cowpea Collaboration Research Support Programme, Purdue University.
14.
GangadharappaH. (2005). A statistical study of variation in arrivals and prices of potato in the selected markets of Karnataka. Department of Agricultural Statistic College of Agriculture, Dharwad University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad – 580005.
15.
GhoshM. (2000). Cointegration tests and spatial integration of rice markets in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(4), October-December, 616–625.
16.
GolettiF.AhmedR.FaridN. (1995). Structural determinant of market integration. The case study of rice in Bangladesh. The Development Economics, Vol. (XXXII-2), 41–50.
17.
GoodwinB.K.GrennesT.J.WohlgenantM.K. (1990). Testing the law of one price when trade takes time. Journal of International Money and Finance, 5(1), 682–693.
18.
GordonG.V.HobbsJ.E.KeirW.A. (1993). A test for price integration in the lamb market. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4491(2), 126–134.
19.
JohansenS. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(1), 231–254.
20.
JohansenS.JuseliusK. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(1), 169–210.
21.
JohansenS.JuseliusK. (1992). Testing structural hypothesis in a multivariate cointegration analysis of the PPP and UIP for UK. Econometrica, 53(4), 211–244.
22.
LangyintuoA.Lowenberg-DeboerJ.FayeM.LambertD.IbroG.MoussaB.KergnaA.KushwahaA.NtoukamG. (2003). Cowpea supply and demand: West and Central Africa. Field Crops Research, 82(8), 215–231.
23.
Lowenberg-DeboerJ.CoulibalyO. (2000). The economics of cowpea in West Africa keynote address for the cowpea post harvest and socioeconomic studies session World Cowpea Conference. Ibadan, Nigeria.
24.
MafimisebiT.E. (2008). Long-run price integration in the Nigerian fresh fish market implications for marketing and development. Delhi Business Review X, 9(1), 65–76.
25.
MoshoodO. OladapoMomohS. (2011). Food price difference and market integration in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(1), 69–74.
26.
OhenS.B.AbangS.O.IdiongI.C. (2007). Price transmission and market integration: Vertical and horizontal price linkages for life catfish in Nigeria’. Journal of Pure and Applied Science, 7, 37–42.
27.
OkohR.N.EgbonP.C. (1999). A new world organization (WTO): Implications for agribusiness in the next century. In EgbonP.C.OrubuC.O. (Eds), Critical issues in Nigeria’s development. Onitsha, Nigeria: New Age Publishers.
28.
OkohR.N.EgbonP.C. (2005). The integration of Nigeria rural and urban foodstuff. AERC Research Papers No. 151. Nairobi: African Economic Research Consortium.
29.
PalaskasT. WhiteHarrisB. (1993). Testing market integration: New approaches with case materials from the West Bengal economy. Journal of Development Studies, 30(1), 1–57.
30.
RavallionM. (1986). Testing market integration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 102–109.
