Increased integration between the developed and developing countries has seen substantial decrease in trade-related barriers. In addition, there is a debate that developing countries tend to lower the environmental standards to attract more foreign direct investment (FDI). In this context, the objective of this article is to examine the relationship between FDI and environmental status in different Indian states. Using data for the period 1996–2006 covering 16 states in India, we test for the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) that is, if air quality has a role in influencing FDI in Indian states. Our result does not support that FDI flows into the states with poor air quality. Other economic, demographic and geographic variables play a significant role in attracting FDI.
AnandSudhirSenAmartya K. (1994), ‘Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement’, Occasional Papers, Human Development Report Office, New York.
2.
AliyuMohammed (2005), ‘Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: Pollution Haven Hypothesis Revisited’, Paper Presented at Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lubeck, Germany, 9–11, June.
3.
BuehnAndreasFarzanegaMohammad Reza (2011), ‘Hold Your Breath: A New Index of Air Quality’, Discussion Paper Series No.: 11–24, Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, December pp. 1–31, available at http://www.uu.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/REBO/REBO_USE/REBO_USE_OZZ/11-24.pdf
4.
ClappR.A. (1998), ‘Waiting for the Forest Law: Resource-led Development and Environmental Politics in Chile’, Latin American Research Review, 33(2): 3–37.
5.
ChakrabortyDebashis (2012), ‘Is India Turning into a Pollution Haven? Evidences from Trade and Investment Patterns’, in MukherjeeS.ChakrabortyD. (eds), Environmental Scenario in India: Successes and Predicaments, pp. 243–66, London and New York: Routledge.
6.
ChandrasekharanIndraniKumarR. SendhilRaghunathanSeenaChandrasekaranShweta (2013), ‘Construction of Environmental Performance Index and Ranking of States’, Current Science, 104(4): 435–39.
7.
DahlmanC. (2007), ‘Technology, Globalization and International Competitiveness: Challenges for Developing Countries’, in OcampoJ.A. (ed.), Industrial Development for the 21st Century: Sustainable Development Perspective, Chapter 1, pp. 29–84. New York: United Nations, available at http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/industrial_development/1_2.pdf
8.
DeanJ.M.LovelyM.E.WangH. (2005), Are Foreign Investors Attracted to Weak Environmental Regulations? Evaluating the Evidence from China, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3505.
9.
DietzenbacherErikMukhopadhyayKakali (2007), ‘An Empirical Examination of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis for India: Towards a Green Leontief Paradox?’, Environmental & Resource Economics, 36: 427–49.
10.
DrukkerDavidMillimetDaniel L. (2007), ‘Assessing the Pollution Haven Hypothesis in an Interdependent World’, Departmental Working Papers, No. 703, University, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist, January, pp. 1–50.
11.
GrayW.B.ShadbegianR.J. (1998), ‘Environmental Regulation, Investment Timing, and Technology Choice’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 64(2): 235–56.
12.
JenaP.R.SahuN.C.RathB. (2005), ‘Does Trade Liberalisation Create Pollution Haven? An Indian Experience’, Paper Presented at the ‘International Conference on Environment and Development: Developing Countries Perspective’, April 7–8 2005, International Trade and Development Division, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
13.
KellerW.LevinsonA. (2002), ‘Pollution Abatement Costs and Foreign Direct Investment to U.S. States’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4): 691–703.
14.
LevinsonA. (1996), ‘Environmental Regulations and Manufacturer’s Location Choices: Evidence from the Census of Manufacturing’, Journal of Public Economics, 61(1): 5–29.
15.
MihciHakanCagataySelimKoskaOnur (2004), The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment, Beytepe, Ankara/Turkey: Department of Economics, Hacettepe University.
16.
MolinaDavid J. (1993), ‘A Comment on Whether Maquiladoras are in Mexico for Low Wages or to Avoid Pollution Abatement Costs.’ Journal of Environment and Development, 2: 221–41.
17.
MukherjeeA. (2011), ‘Regional Inequality in Foreign Direct Investment Flows to India: The Problem and the Prospects’, Reserve Bank of India, Occasional Papers, 32(2): 99–127, Monsoon 2011.
18.
MukherjeeS.ChakrabortyD. (2009), ‘Environment, Human Development and Economic Growth: A Contemporary Analysis of Indian States’, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 9(1 and 2): 20–49.
19.
MukherjeeS.KathuriaV. (2006), ‘Is Economic Growth Sustainable? Environmental Quality of Indian States after 1991’, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1): 38–60.
20.
MukhopadhyayKakali (2004), ‘Impact of Trade on Energy Use and Environment in India: A Input-output Analysis’, Paper presented for International conference ‘Input-output and General Equilibrium: Data, Modeling and Policy Analysis’, at the Free University of Brussels, Brussels, September.
21.
RabindranGamperShantiJhaShreyasi (2004), ‘Environmental Impact of India’s Trade Liberalisation’, World Bank Working Paper Series, June, pp. 1–40.
22.
RaoChalapatiMurthyM.R. (2006), ‘Towards Understanding the State-wise Distribution of Foreign Direct Investments in the Post-Liberalisation Period’, Working Paper No. 2006–01, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi.
23.
SinghKavaljit (1997), The Reality of Foreign Investments: German Investments in India, New Delhi: Madhyam Books.
24.
SpatareanuMariana (2007), ‘Searching for Pollution Havens: The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment’, Journal of Environment Development, 16: 161–82.
25.
WaldkirchGopinath (2008), ‘Pollution Control and Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico: An Industry-level Analysis’, Environment Resource Economics, 41(2February): 289–313.
26.
WalterI.Ugelow (1979), ‘Environmental Policies in Developing Countries’, Ambio, 8: 102–109.
27.
WooldridgeJ.M. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, US: MIT Press.
28.
WheelerD.ModyA. (1992), ‘International Investment Location Decisions: the Case of US Firms’, Journal of International Economics, 33: 57–76.
29.
XingY.KolstadC. (1998), ‘Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment?’, Economics Working Paper, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara; 1078.
