India’s federal and state-level labour regulations are evaluated using a set of standardised tools. Though federal labour regulations are found to be highly restrictive in international comparison with OECD countries, there is considerable variation in the regulatory stance in individual Indian states. This variation in regulation is associated with a substantial degree of de facto job flexibility in the states that have undertaken more labour reforms, and less flexibility in those states and sub-sectors that have undertaken fewer reforms. Labour market reforms could serve to limit the detrimental effects that the consequentially high labour costs and rigidity have on the dynamism of the labour market, as well as to improve the labour wage share, limit the relative increase in informal employment and also enhance aggregate productivity.
ADB (2005), Labour Markets in Asia: Promoting Full, Productive, and Decent Employment—Key Indicators. Asian Development Bank , available online at: www.adb.org/documents/books/key_indicators/2005/
2.
Ahmad, Nadim (2006), ‘A Proposed Framework for Business Demography Statistics’, OECD Statistics Directorate Working Paper 2006/3, November, Paris: OECD .
3.
Aghion, Philippe , Robin Burgess , Stephen J. Redding and Fabrizio Zilibotti (2008), ‘ The Unequal Effects of Liberalization: Evidence from Dismantling the License Raj in India ’, American Economic Review, 98(4): 1397–1412 .
4.
Ahsan, Ahmad and Carmen Pagés (2009), ‘ Are all Labour Regulations Equal? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing ’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1): 62–75 .
5.
Anant, T.C.A. and O. Goswami (1995), ‘Getting Everything Wrong: India’s Policy Regarding Sick Firms’, in Dilip Mukherjee (ed.), Essays in Industrial Policy, pp. 238–88. New Delhi: Oxford University Press .
6.
Anant, T.C.A. , R. Hasan , P. Mohapatra , R. Nagraj and S.K. Sasikumar (2006), ‘Labour Markets in India: Issues and Perspectives’, in Jesus Felipe and Rana Hasan (eds), Labour Markets in Asia: Issues and Perspectives, pp. 205–300. London: Asian Development Bank and Palgrave Macmillan .
7.
Autor, David H. , William R. Kerr and Adriana D. Kugler (2007), ‘ Do Employment Protections Reduce Productivity? Evidence from US States ’, The Economic Journal, 117(521)(June): F189–F217 .
8.
Besley, Timothy and Robin Burgess (2002), ‘Can Labour Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India’, CEPR Discussion Papers No. 3260, March. London .
9.
Besley, Timothy and Robin Burgess (2004), ‘ Can Labour Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India ’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1): 91–134 .
10.
Bhattacharjea, A. (2006), ‘ Labour Market Regulation and Industrial Performance in India: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence ’, Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 49(2): 211–32 .
11.
Caballero, Ricardo , Kevin N. Cowan , Eduardo M.R.A. Engel and Alejandro Micco (2004), ‘Effective Labour Regulation and Microeconomic Flexibility’, NBER Working Paper No. 10744. Boston, MA .
12.
CII (2004a), Labour Reforms in Southern Region States—Issues and Concerns. Confederation of Indian Industry, Policy Primer No. 3, April. New Delhi .
13.
CII (2004b), Driving Growth Through Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Labour Practices in Select Northern Region States. Confederation of Indian Industry, Northern Region, July. New Delhi .
14.
CSO (2006), Employment and Unemployment Situation in India 2004–05. NSS 61st Round (July 2004–June 2005), Report No. 515. New Delhi .
15.
Davis, Steven , John C. Haltiwanger and Scott Schuh (1998), Job Creation and Destruction. Cambridge: MIT Press .
16.
Debroy, Bibek and P.D. Kaushik (2005), Reforming The Labour Market. New Delhi: Academic Foundation with Friedrich Naumann Stiftung and Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies .
17.
Debroy, Bibek (2005), ‘Issues in Labour Law Reform’, in Debroy and Kaushik (eds), Reforming The Labour Market, pp. 37–76. New Delhi: Academic Foundation with Friedrich Naumann Stiftung and Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies .
18.
Deng, Haiyan and Robert H. McGuckin (2005), ‘The Dynamics of China’s Labour Market: Job Creation and Destruction in the Industrial Sector’, ICSEAD Working Paper Series Vol. 2005–18, November, available online at: www.icsead.or.jp/7publication/workingpp/wp2005/2005-18.pdf.
19.
Dougherty, Sean , Richard Herd and Thomas Chalaux (2009), ‘ What is Holding Back Productivity Growth in India? Recent Microevidence ’, OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2009(45): 67–88 .
20.
GOI (2007), Economic Survey 2005–06. Ministry of Finance, Government of India , available online at: indiabudget.nic.in.
21.
Haltiwanger, John , Stefano Scarpetta and Helena Schweiger (2006), ‘Assessing Job Flows Across Countries: The Role of Industry, Firm Size, and Regulations’, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper No. 4070. Washington, DC .
22.
Hasan, Rana , Devashish Mitra and K.V. Ramaswamy (2007), ‘ Trade Reforms, Labour Regulations and Labour–Demand Elasticities: Empirical Evidence from India ’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3): 466–81 .
23.
Malik, P.L. (2006), Industrial Law: A Manual of Central Labour and Industrial Laws incorporating State Amendments with Rules, Regulations and Select Notifications. Lucknow: Eastern Book Company .
24.
Messina, J. and G. Vallanti (2007), ‘ Job Flow Dynamics and Firing Restrictions: Evidence from Europe ’, Economic Journal, 117(521): 279–301 .
25.
Micco, Alejandro and Carmen Pagés (2004), ‘Employment Protection and Gross Job Flows: A Differences-in-Differences Approach’, Inter-American Development Bank , Working Paper No. 508, available online at: www.iadb.org/res/publications/pubfiles/pubWP-508.pdf.
26.
Nagaraj, R. (2004), ‘ Fall in Organised Manufacturing Employment: A Brief Note ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 39(30)(24 July): 3387–90 .
27.
Narain, A. (2006), ‘ Wage Trends and Determinants ’, Paper written for the India Labour Conference and World Bank Report, India’s Employment Challenge: Creating Jobs, Helping Workers, World Bank, Washington, forthcoming.
28.
OECD (1996), Job Creation and Loss: Analysis, Policy and Data Development. Paris: OECD .
29.
OECD (1999), ‘Employment Protection Legislation’, in Employment Outlook—Giving Youth a Better Start, pp. 47–132. Paris: OECD .
30.
OECD (2004), ‘Employment Protection Regulation and Labour Market Performance’, in OECD Employment Outlook, pp. 61–126. Paris: OECD .
31.
OECD (2006), Employment Outlook—Boosting Jobs and Incomes. Paris: OECD .
32.
OECD (2007), Economic Survey of India. Paris: OECD .
Purfield, Catriona (2006), ‘Mind the Gap—Is Economic Growth in India Leaving Some States Behind?’ IMF Working Paper No. 06/103, April. Washington DC .
35.
Roy, S. Dutta (2002), ‘ Job Security Regulations and Worker Turnover: A Study of the Indian Manufacturing Sector ’, Indian Economic Review, 37(2): 141–62 .
36.
Roy, S. Dutta (2004), ‘ Employment Dynamics in Indian Industry: Adjustment Lags and the Impact of Job Security Regulations ’, Journal of Development Economics, 73(1): 233–56 .
37.
Sanyal, Paroma and Nidhiya Menon (2005), ‘ Labour Disputes and the Economics of Firm Geography: A Study of Domestic Investment in India ’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53(4): 825–54 .
38.
Singh, Manisha G. (2006), ‘Labour Adjustment in an Evolving Marketplace: An Empirical Investigation’, India Development Foundation Working Paper No. 0603, May. Gurgaon, India .
39.
TeamLease (2006), India Labour Report: A Ranking of Indian States. New Delhi: TeamLease Services , available online at: www.teamlease.com/TeamLease-LabourReport2006.pdf.
40.
Topalova, Petia (2004), ‘Factor Immobility and Regional Impacts of Trade Liberalization: Evidence on Poverty and Inequality from India’, Three Empirical Essays on Trade and Development in India, Dissertation, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
41.
Topalova, Petia (2007), ‘Trade Liberalization, Poverty and Inequality: Evidence from Indian Districts’, in Ann Harrison (ed.), Globalization and Poverty, pp. 291–334. Chicago: NBER and University of Chicago Press .
42.
Venn, D. (2009), ‘Legislation, Collective Bargaining and Enforcement: Updating the OECD Employment Protection Indicators’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 89. Paris: France .
43.
Watson-Wyatt (2005), Benefits and Employment Terms Reports for Asia Pacific. Hong Kong, China .
44.
World Bank (2010), India’s Employment Challenge: Creating Jobs, Helping Workers. The World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington DC .
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
