Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation, the inter-regional mechanism which was initiated primarily as a combination of India’s Look East Policy and Thailand’s Look West Policy, need to be reviewed in terms of achievements and difficulties faced so far as it has already completed first 16 years of existence. This article aims to identify its shortfalls and positive aspects in order to understand its potential, if there are any.
AhsanullahA. K. M. (2011). Rohingya refugees to Bangladesh: Historical exclusions and contemporary marginalization. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 9, 139–161.
2.
AlbaredaAdriaOriolBarba, (2011). Sub-regionalism in North Africa and the Middle East: Lessons learnt and New Opportunities (European Institute of the Mediterranean, Joint Series with EUROMESCO). Retrieved 3April2013, from http://www.iemed.org/observatori-en/arees-danalisi/arxius-adjunts/papers-iemed-euromesco/paperseuromesco2.pdf/view
3.
ALTSEAN BURMA (2004, November). A failing grade: Burma’s drug eradication efforts (Special Report, 142), as cited in Chachavalpongpun, Pavin (2010).
4.
Asian Development Bank (2008). Bay of Bengal initiative for multisectoral technical and economic cooperation (BIMSTEC) transport infrastructure and logistics study (Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report). Retrieved 16September2013, from http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/projdocs/2008/38396-01-reg-tacr.pdf
5.
Asian Development Bank (2013). ‘Regional cooperation and integration experiences in Asia and the Pacific’. Retrieved 5May2013, from http://www.adb.org/publications/regional-cooperation-and-integration-experiences-asia-and-pacific
6.
BalaramRavi A. (2012). Case study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh maritime boundary dispute in the Bay of Bengal and its implications for South China sea claims. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 31(3), 85–104.
7.
BanerjeePaula (1998). Borders as unsettled markers in South Asia: A case study of Sino-Indian border. International Studies, 35(2), 179–191, as cited in Murayama, Mayumi (2006).
8.
BanikN. (2005). Trade liberalization and regional development in BIMSTEC region: Does geographical characteristics matter? (CSIRD Discussion Paper No. 3). Retrieved 10March2010, from http://www.csird.org.in/discussion.htm
9.
BanikNilanjan (2007). The BIMSTEC FTA and its relevance (CSIRD Discussion Paper No. 36). Retrieved 10March2010, from http://csird.org.in/wp-content/uploads/discussion/DP36.pdf
10.
BarbhuiyanShelly (2009). India–Bangladesh relations issues and challenges. Himalayan and Central Asian Studies, 13(4), 35–50.
11.
BatraAmita (2013). Regional economic integration in South Asia trapped in conflict. London and New York: Routledge.
12.
BeheraN. C. et al. (2000). People-to-people contact in South Asia. Delhi: Manohar.
13.
BhagwatiJagdish (2004). In defense of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, as cited in Bhagwati, Jagdish (2008).
14.
BIMSTEC (2004). BIMSTEC summit declaration. Retrieved 6January2011, from http://www.bimstec.org/downloads/1st-bimstec-summit/declaration-on-1st-bimstec-summit.pdf
15.
BIMSTEC (2008a). Second BIMSTEC summit declaration. Retrieved 6January2011, from http://www.bimstec.org/downloads/2nd-bimstec-summit/second-bimstec-summit-declaration.pdf
16.
BIMSTEC (2008b). BIMSTEC sectors and sub-sectors. Retrieved 6January2011, from http://www.bimstec.org/sectors.php
17.
BIMSTEC (2011). Task force on trans-power exchange holds its third meeting in Dhaka (BIMSTEC Newsletter 52). Retrieved 18October2011, from http://www.bimstec.org/newsletter/52-aug-2011-enewsletter.pdf
18.
BIMSTEC Energy Center (2006a). News. Retrieved 11January2011, from http://www.bimstecenergycentre.org/news.html
19.
BIMSTEC Energy Center (2006b). Area of activity of BIMSTEC Energy Center. Retrieved 11January2011, from http://www.bimstecenergycentre.org/areas.html
20.
BlombergS. BrockHessGreogory D. (2006). How much does violence tax trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 599–612, as cited in Batra, Amita (2013).
21.
ChachavalpongpunPavin (2010a). ‘Thailand-Myanmar Relations: Old Animosity in a New Bilateral setting’, in GanesanN.AmerRamses (Ed.), International relations in Southeast Asia between bilateralism and multilateralism (pp. 117–137). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
22.
ChachavalpongpunPavin (2010b). ‘Last Bus to Nay Pyi Taw’, in RieffelLex (Ed.), Myanmar/Burma: Inside challenges, outside interests (pp. 166–180). Washington DC: Brookings Institutions and Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
23.
ChakrabortyTridib (2009). ‘The Emerging India–Thailand Relations in the Post-Cold-War Era’, in GhoshLipi (Ed.), Connectivity and beyond India-Thai relations through ages (pp.197–211). Kolkata: The Asiatic Society.
24.
ChalermpalanupapTermsak (2010). ‘ASEAN’s Policy of Enhanced Interactions’, in RieffelLex (Ed.), Myanmar/Burma: Inside challenges, outside interests (pp. 150–165). Washington DC: Brookings Institutions and Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
25.
ChongkkittavornKavi (2001). Thai-Burma relation challenge to democratization in Myanmar: Perspectives in multilateral and bilateral response. Stockholm: International Institute for Democratic and Electoral Assistance, as cited in Chachavalpongpun, Pavin (2010a).
26.
ChuangC. (1998). Learning by doing, the technology gap and growth,International Economic Review, 39, 697–721, as cited in Banik, Nilanjan (2007).
27.
CollinsAlan (2008). A people oriented ASEAN: A door ajar or closed for civil society organizations. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 313–331.
28.
CSIRD and ICC (2008). BIMSTEC Cooperation Report 2008. Kolkata: Centre for Studies in International Relations and Development and Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industries.
29.
DasGurudas (2009). Indo-Bangladesh relations: Issues in Trade, transit and security. Himalayan and Central Asian studies, 13(4), 5–34.
30.
DasPushpita (2012). Drug trafficking in India: A case for border security. (Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses Occasional Paper 24). New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses.
31.
DasSamir Kumar (2009). Bangladesh: The pangs of proximity. World Focus, November–December, 451–456.
32.
DuttaSujit (2011). China in SAARC? To what effect?: A response to the debate. Strategic Analysis, 35(3), 519–524.
33.
Financial Express (2005, May30), Myanmar may use BIMSTEC to bring India and ASEAN closer. Retrieved 18August2013, from http://www.financialexpress.com/news/myanmar-may-use-bimstec-to-bring-india-and-asean-closer/138971/1
34.
FrankRobert (1999). ‘An European Overview’, in ChopraH.S.FrankF.SchroderJ. (Eds), National Identity and Regional Cooperation (pp. 317–324). Delhi: Manohar.
35.
FrankelJeffrey, A. (1995). Trading blocs and the Americas: The natural, the unnatural, and the super-natural. Journal of Development Economics, 47 (1), 61–95; as cited in Edward D. Mansfield, Helen V. Milner (1999).The new wave of regionalism. International Organization, 53(3), 589–627.
36.
Fujita et al. (2009). The economic transition in Myanmar after 1988: Market economy versus state control (p. 5). Singapore: NUS Press, as quoted in L. S. Singh (2010).
37.
GanesanN.RamsesAmer, (Eds). (2006). International relations in Southeast Asia between bilateralism and multilateralism (pp. 117–137). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
38.
GlickReuvanTaylorAlan M. (2005). Collateral damage: Trade disruption and the economic impact of war (NBER Working Paper 11565), as cited in Batra, Amita (2013).
39.
GyohtenToyoo (2009). Interview with Mr Anthony Rowley. Asia Lacks Political Will to Support Regionalism,Development Asia, Retrieved 12December2013, from http://development.asia/issue03/cover-02.asp
40.
HurrelAndrew (1995). ‘Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective in Regionalism’, in LouisF.andF.HurrelAndrew (Eds). World politics: Regional organisation and international order (pp. 39–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
IMF Direction of Trade Statistics, as calculated in Asian Development Bank, Asia Regional Integration Center (2012). Retrieved 24September2012, from http://aric.adb.org/indicators.php?sort=country&filter=all&r_indicators%5B%5D=TCINTSHR_DOT&r_reporters%5B%5D=ASEAN&r_partners%5B%5D=ASEAN&r_years%5B%5D=2001&r_years%5B%5D=2002&r_years%5B%5D=2003&r_years%5B%5D=2004&r_years%5B%5D=2005&r_years%5B%5D=2006&r_years%5B%5D=2007&r_years%5B%5D=2008&r_years%5B%5D=2009&r_years%5B%5D=2010&r_years%5B%5D=2011
42.
IntrawityanuntPitak (1997). Looking west at BIST-EC A bridge not too far. Government of Thailand.
43.
JhaHari Bansh (2013). Nepal–India cooperation in river water management. Strategic Analysis, 37(2), 217–230.
44.
KalegamaSaman (2001). Bangkok agreement and BIMSTEC: Crawling regional economic groupings in Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 12, 105–121.
45.
LincolnEdward J. (2010). ‘The Asian Regional Economy’, in ShambaughD.YahudaM. (Eds.). International Relations of Asia, in KimSamuel S. (Series Ed.) Asia in World Politics. US: Pentagon Press, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
46.
LongAndrew G. (2009). Bilateral trade in the shadow of armed conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), as cited in Batra, Amita (2013).
47.
MallaKatak (2010). Nepal-India-China learning and unlearning of diplomatic conduct. Think India Quarterly, 13(4), 212–220.
48.
MenonShivshankar (2007). The challenges ahead for India’s foreign policy. World Focus, 28(10), 389–391.
49.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Thailand (1997). Declaration on the admission of the union of Myanmar and the re-naming of BIST-EC. Government of Thailand.
50.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Thailand (2009). The 12th anniversary of the establishment of BIMSTEC. Retrieved 20September2012, from http://www.mfa.go.th/main/en/media-center/28/1635-The-12th-Anniversary-of-the-Establishment-of-BIMSTEC--.html
51.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nepal (2013). BIMSTEC. Retrieved 13May2013, from http://www.mofa.gov.np/en/bimstec-170.html
52.
MurayamaMayumi (2006). Borders, migration and sub-regional cooperation in Eastern South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(14), 1351–1359.
53.
MyoeMaung Aung (2006). Regionalism in Myanmar’s foreign policy: Past, present and future (Asia Research Institute Working Paper 73). Retrieved 11September2013, from http://www.ari.nus.edu.sg/docs/wps/wps06_073.pdf
54.
NagRajat (2013). Regional cooperation and integration experiences in Asia and the Pacific (Asian Development Bank). Retrieved 5May2013, from http://www.adb.org/publications/regional-cooperation-and-integration-experiences-asia-and-pacific
55.
OntaP. (2001). No visas: So what is the problem?Himal. Retrieved 12December2013, from http://old.himalmag.com/himal-feed/60/1965-No-visas--So-what-is-the-problem?.html
56.
PalitAmitendu (2006). ‘Technology Upgradation through Global Value Chains: Challenges before BIMSTEC Nations’, in BatesCrispine (Ed.). Towards BIMSTEC-Japan comprehensive economic cooperation: The benefits of moving together. India: Anthem Press.
57.
PanaspornprasitChookiat (2004). ‘Thailand: Politicized Thaksinazation’. Southeast Asian Affairs (2004) (pp. 257–266). Singapore: Institute for Southeast Asian Studies.
58.
PapazoglouC.PentecostE. J.MarquesH. (2006). A gravity model forecast of the potential trade effects of EU enlargement: Lessons from 2004 and path-dependency in integration. World Economy, 29, 1077–89, as cited in Mahfuz Kabir and Ruhul Salim (2010). Can gravity model explain BIMSTEC’ s trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 25(1), 143–165.
59.
PerkmannMarkusSumNgai-Ling (2002). ‘Globalization, Regionalization and Cross-Border Regions Discourses and Governance’ in PerkmannMarkusSumNgai-Ling (Eds). Globalization, regionalization and cross-border regions, in ShawTimothy M. (Series Ed.), International Political Economy Series (pp. 3–19). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
60.
PhongpaichitPasuk (1990). The new wave of Japanese investment in ASEAN: Determinants and prospects. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, as quoted in Busbarat, Pongphisoot (2012).
61.
Pike et al. (2006). Local and regional development, (pp. 3–20). London, New York and Canada: Routledge.
62.
PongphisootBusbarat (2012). A review of Thailand’s foreign policy in mainland Southeast Asia: Exploring an ideational approach. European Journal of East Asian StudiesII (2012), 127–154.
63.
RahmanSultan hafeez (2011). Energy trade in South Asia: Opportunities and challenges (Asian Development Bank). Retrieved 16September2013, from http://www.perpustakaan.depkeu.go.id/FOLDEREBOOK/energy-trade-south-asia.pdf
64.
RanaSwadesh M. (2010). Terropiracy: A topic for BIMSTEC (ACUNS, The Academic Council on United Nations System, 84, December 2010). Retrieved 5December, 2012, from http://acuns.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Fall_2010.pdf
65.
RaoP. V. (2005). ‘Sub-regional Strategies of Cooperation in ASEAN: The Indian Approach’, in ReddyK. Raja (Ed.), India and ASEAN: foreign policy dimensions for the 21st Century (pp. 152–169). USA: New Century Publications.
66.
RasulGolamManandharPrem (2009). Prospects and Problems in Promoting Tourism in South Asia: A Regional Perspective. South Asia Economic Journal, 10(1), 187–207.
67.
RivanoNeantro Saavedra (2001). ‘Developmental Affinities in Regional Integration’, in Saavedra-RivanoNeantroHosonoAkioStallingsBarbara (Eds), Regional Integration and Economic Development (pp. 91–100). New York: Palgrave.
68.
SahadevanP. (2011). ‘India’s Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Period Implications for South Asia and India–Sri Lanka Relations’, in SumanasiriLiyanageSahadevanP.KinraAnisha (Eds), Perspectives on India–Sri Lanka Relations (pp. 102–176). New Delhi: South Asia Peace Institute, Manak Publications.
69.
ScalapinoR. (1991–92). The United States and Asia: Future Prospects. Foreign Affairs, 70(5), 19–41, as cited in Perkmann, Markus and Sum, Ngai-Ling (n.d.).
70.
SenRahulAsherMukul G. (2006). BIMSTEC – Japan economic partnership: Opportunities and challenges. Kolkata: Centre for Studies in International Relations and Development.
71.
ShahAlam, M.FaruqueAbdullah Al (2010). The problem of delimitation of Bangladesh’s maritime boundaries with India and Myanmar: Prospects for a solution. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 25, 405–423.
72.
SharmaN. (2012). India’s look East policy (LEP). Lecture as a part of Distinguished Lecture Series by Indian Public Diplomacy, Ministry of External Affairs. Retrieved 20September2012, from http://www.indiandiplomacy.in/htmllecture.aspx?skrc=330
73.
ShekharVibhanshu (2008). Thailand’s investment in India’s Northeast strategies, potentials and risks (Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, Research Paper). Delhi: Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. Retrieved 7February2013, from http://www.ipcs.org/pdf_file/issue/320432571IPCS-ResearchPaper13-Vibhanshu.pdf
74.
SinghL. S. (2010). Northeast India in BIMSTEC: The Myanmarese Factor. Paper presented in a JAIR Seminar, Shillong. Retrieved 17August2013, from http://www.jair.net.in/files/documents/SURAJ-SINGH.doc
75.
Sunday Observer (2008). FM’s Call for Combating Terrorism in BIMSTEC Countries. Sunday Observer, August31, Retrieved 5December2012, from http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2008/08/31/pol10.asp
76.
SuryanarayanV. (2000). ‘Prospects for a Bay of Bengal Community’. Seminar, 487. Retrieved 11September2013, from http://www.india-seminar.com/2000/487/487%20suryanarayan.htm
77.
SuryanarayanV. (2013). e-mail to the author, 6 August 2013.
78.
Thaindian News (2010). ‘12th Ministerial Meet of BIMSTEC Begins in Myanmar’. Retrieved 20April2010, from http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world-news/12th-ministerial-meet-of-bimstec-begins-in-myanmar_100287582.html
79.
Thailand PRD (2011). ‘Thailand’s Active Role in Enhancing BIMSTEC Connectivity’. Bangkok: The Government Public Relations Department, Government of Thailand. Retrieved 28September2012, from http://thailand.prd.go.th/view_news.php?id=5477&a=3
80.
The Sunday Times (2011). Another FP Blunder: Lanka Loses BIMSTEC Secretariat. The Sunday Times, January30. Retrieved 16October2012 from, http://www.sundaytimes.lk/110130/News/nws_01.html
81.
UNESCAP (1996). ‘Trans-Asian Railway Route Requirements’, in Development of the Trans-Asian Railway in the Indo-China and ASEAN Sub-region, vol. 1. (pp. 1–37). New York: United Nations.
82.
UNESCAP (1997). BIST-EC development programme overview and sectoral cooperation. Bangkok: United Nations.
83.
UNESCAP (1999). Development of the trans-Asian railway in the southern corridor of Asia-Europe routes. Bangkok, New York: United Nations.
84.
UNESCAP (2012). Growing together economic integration for an inclusive and sustainable Asia-Pacific century. Bangkok: UNESCAP.
85.
World Bank (2012). ‘GDP per capita (current US$)’. Data. Retrieved 8October2012, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
86.
World Bank (2013). ‘World Data Bank, world development indicators’. Retrieved 7May2013, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/reports/tableview.aspx#
87.
World Economic Forum (2013). ‘The travel and tourism competitiveness index 2013 data analyzer’. Retrieved 9April2013, from http://www.weforum.org/issues/travel-and-tourism-competitiveness/ttci-platform
88.
YahyaFaizal (2005). BIMSTEC and emerging patterns of Asian regional and interregional cooperation. Australian Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 391–410.
