The adoption of pre-emptive self-defence as a policy by the United States of America in its war against terrorism has revived the controversy over the concept of pre-emptive use of force in international politics. Some scholars argue that states are stretching the right of self-defence as pre-emptive, preventive and anticipatory in accordance with their needs and interests and to justify their actions. For others, in the context of changing security threats such as terrorism and Weapons of Mass Destruction pre-emptive strikes are permissible. These efforts to redefine and re-interpret the right of self-defence and use of force for justifying state’s actions have challenged the role of international organisations that were principally designed to regulate the unilateral use of force, and to maintain international peace and security. Against this backdrop, this article will examine how the pre-emptive and preventive use of force undermines the role of the United Nations in international politics through probing the case of Iraq War 2003. This would be a much needed reflection on the implications of Iraq War on multilateralism in the context of 10 years after the war.
AnandRuchi. (2009). Self-defence in international relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
AnnanKofi. (2003, 23September). The Secretary-General address to the General Assembly. New York, NY. Retrieved 20February2013, from http://www.un.org.
3.
ArmstrongDavidFarrellTheoLambertHelene. (2012). International law and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BlairTony. (2004, 5March). Prime Minister warns of continuing global Terror threat. Retrieved 20January2013, from http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page5461.asp.
5.
BlokkerNiels. (2000). Is the authorization authorized? Powers and practice of the UN Security Council to authorize the use of force by coalitions of the able and willing. European Journal of International Law, 11(3), 541–568.
6.
BushGeorge W. (2002). President’s remarks at the United Nations General Assembly. White House Text. Retrieved 12September2003, from http://www.whitehouse.gov
7.
BushGeorge W. (2003, 17March). President address to the Nation. The White House. Retrieved 6December2012, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases.
8.
BzostekRachel. (2008). Why not preempt security, law and anticipatory military activities. Adlershot: Ashgate.
9.
CimbalaStepehen J. (1994). Military Persuasion: Deterrence and Provocation in Crisis and War. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
10.
DaalderIvo. (2002). Policy implications of the Bush doctrine on preemption. Retrieved 12December2013, from http://www.cfr.org/international-law/policy-implications-bush-doctrine-preemption/p5251.
11.
Department of Defence, United States. (2003). Dictionary of military terms. Retrieved 30September2012, from http://www.defense.gov/pubs/archive.html.
12.
DinsteinYoram. (2005). War aggression and self-defence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FalkRichard A. (2003). prevention. Retrieved 12December2012, from http://www.oldsite.transnational.org/SAJT/forum/meet/2003/FalkUNCharter.html.
14.
FrankThomas M. (2002). Recourse to force: State action against threats and armed attack. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GaddisJ. L. (2004). Surprise, security and the American experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
General Assembly Resolution. (1956a, 4November). United Nations General Assembly emergency special session, resolution on Suez Crisis. UNGA Res 998 (ES-I), UN Doc A/3354, 2 Retrieved 11January2013, from http://www.un.org/documents.net
17.
General Assembly Resolution (1956b, 7November). United Nations General Assembly Emergency Special Session, Resolution on Suez Crisis. UNGA Res 1002 (ES-I), UN Doc A/3354, 3. Retrieved 11January2013, from http://www.un.org/documents.net
18.
General Assembly Resolution (1981). UN Doc A/RES/36/27. Retrieved 11January2013, from http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/36/a36r027.htm
19.
General Assembly Resolution (1986). Declaration of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity on the aerial and naval military attack against the Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya by the present United States Administration. UN Doc. A/RES 41/38. Retrieved 20March2013, from http://www.un.org/documents.net/a41r38.htm.
20.
GlenCarol M. (2009). The United Nations charter system and the Iraq wars: Ethical implications. Public Integrity, 11(4), 309–326.
21.
Global News Wire. (2004, 10September). North Korean official says pre-emptive attack not a monopoly of the US. Retrieved from http://globalnewswire.com
22.
Government of France. (2003). 2003–2008 military programs, Ministry of Defense. Retrieved 13May2013, from http://www.ambafrance-us.org/atoz/mindefa.pdf.
23.
GrayChristine D. (1994). International law and use of force. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
GreenJames A. (2011). Questioning the peremptory status of the prohibition of the use of force. Michigan Journal of International Law, 32(36), 215–257.
25.
GreigDon W. (1991). Self-defence and the Security Council: What does Article 51 require?International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 40(2), 366–402.
26.
GrotiusHugo. (1625 [1999]). On the Law of War and Peace. Translated by KelseyFrancis W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
GuptaSanjay. (2008). The doctrine of preemptive strike: Applications and implications during the administration of President George W. Bush. International Political Science Review, 29(2), 181–196.
28.
HaassRichard N. (1994). Power to persuade. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
29.
HartGary. (2004). The fourth power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
HillRobert. (2002). John Bray memorial oration, University of Adelaide, 28 November. Retrieved 5January2013, from http://www.minister.defence.gov.au/HillSpeechtpl.cfm?CurrentId=2121.
31.
HoonGeoffrey. (2002). The new chapter to the strategic defence review: A progress report. Speech to City Forum Roundtable, 23May2002.
32.
KegleyCharles W.RaymondGregpry A. (2007). The global future: A brief introduction to world politics. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.
33.
KhanTahir A. (2005). Doctrine of preemption: Analysis and implications for South Asia. Carlisle, Pennsylvania: USAWC, Strategy Project Report.
34.
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion). (2004). ICJ Reports, para. 139. Retrieved 12January2013, from http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?pr=71&code=mwp&p1=3&p2=4&p3=6&case=131&k=5a.
35.
LemkeDouglas. (2003). Investigating the preventive motive for war. International Interactions, 29(4), 273–292.
36.
LevyJack S. (1987). Research note: Declining power and the preventive motivation of war. World Politics,, 40(1), 82–107.
37.
Ministry of Defence, UK. (2002, July). The strategic defence review: A new chapter, para. 9. Retrieved 12March2013, from http://www.mod.uk/defenceinternet/home.
38.
National Security Strategy of United States of America. (2002). Retrieved 10January2013, from http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/nss.pdf.
39.
National Security Strategy of United States of America (2006). Retrieved 10January2013, from http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/nss.pdf.
40.
Nicaragua Case. (1986). Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua. ICJ Reports 14, General List No. 70, para. 103 and 195.
41.
O’ConnellMary E. (2002). The myth of preemptive self-defence. Washington DC: The American Society of International Law Task Force Papers.
42.
PowellCollin L. (2003). Powell’s Davos speech, Excerpts. Retrieved 27January2013, from http://news.bbc.co.uk.
43.
ReiterDan. (1995). Exploding the powder keg myth: Preemptive wars almost never happen. International Security, 20(2), 5–34.
44.
Secretary General. (2003, 23September). United Nations Secretary General’s address to the General Assembly, New York, NY. Retrieved 25March2013, from http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/58/statements/sg2eng030923.htm.
45.
Secretary General (2004). Report of the Secretary General’s high-level panel on threats, challenges and change, a more secure world: Our shared responsibility, UN Doc. A/59/565. Retrieved 5March2013, from http://www.un.org.
46.
Security Council. (1981). Statement of Mr. Blum, Israeli Ambassador. UN Doc. S/PV. 2280. Retrieved 13February2013, from http://www.un.org.
47.
Security Council Resolution. (1990). Iraq-Kuwait. UN Doc. S/RES/678. Retrieved 20February2013, from http://www.un.org/documents/sc/res/1990/scres90.htm.
48.
TaftWilliam H. (2002, 18November). Memorandum from William H. Taft IV, Legal Adviser, US State Department, to the American Society of International Law – Council on Foreign Relations Roundtable in Old Rules, New Threats, Policy Implications of the Bush Doctrine of Preemption. Retrieved 20February2010, from http:/www.cfr.org
49.
ThompsonWilliam R. (1983). On global war: Historical-structural approaches to world politics. Carolina: University of Southern Carolina Press.
50.
The New York Times. (2004). Excerpts from Bush’s television interview. Retrieved 10January2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/09/us/excerpts-from-bush-s-television-interview.html
51.
TuckerRobert W. (1960). The just war: A study in contemporary American doctrine. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
52.
UN Charter. (1945). Department of public information. New York: United Nations.
53.
VagtsAlfred. (1956). Defence and diplomacy: The soldier and the conduct of foreign relations. New York: King Crown Press.
54.
VaisseJustin. (2006, 6–8April). The rise and fall of the Bush doctrine: The impact on transatlantic relations, Paper for the ‘Mars vs. Venus—America, Europe and the Future of the West Conference.California: UC Berkeley Institute of European Studies.
55.
VanEvera, Stephen. (1999). Causes of war: Power and roots of conflicts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
56.
VattelEmer De. (1863). Law of nations; or, principles of the law of nature, applied to the conduct and affairs of nations and sovereigns (trans. ChittyJ.). Philadelphia, PA: T & J W Johnson.
57.
WrightQuincy. (1963). The Goa incident. The American Journal of International Law, 56(2), 617–629.
58.
YongTiam K. (2003). Australia, N. Korea join ‘preemptive’ bandwagon. New Straits Times, October26. Available in LEXIS, Major World Newspapers.
