Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

How do available critical frameworks for the study of home movies and amateur film travel to the colonies? This article explores alternative paradigms by which to study the colonial archive, taking as a case study the colonial home movies and amateur films of Colonel Edgar S. Hyde, who served in British India between 1928 and 1947 and was Administrator of the Bastar State (inhabited by a large population of aboriginal Gond Tribes) between 1934 and 1940. The article begins by re-examining the politics of the home movie, and the colonial archive in particular, in terms of the “failed promise” of amateur cinema, despite its potential as a space of opposition and resistance. The author’s analysis of the Hyde films, and the heterogeneous visual modes that coexist promiscuously in the footage, traces the primarily ethnographic mode of the films to the figure of Hyde as an “anthropologically-minded administrator” and to the network of influences on his work and life. The article argues that the films’ ethnographic realism framed by the gaze of Hyde’s amateur camera conceals rather than reveals the visual hierarchies of empire.

Keywords

Colonial home movie amateur film Anthropology colonial administration Gonds

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asad

(Ed.). (1975). Anthropology and the colonial encounter. London: Ithaca Press.

Bechdolt

(1934). Motion pictures any boy can make. London: Hutchinson.

Bottomore

(1997). Have you seen the Gaekwar Bob?: Filming the 1911 Delhi Durbar. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 17(3), 309.

Buettner

(2006). Cemeteries, public memory and Raj nostalgia in postcolonial Britain. History and Memory, 18(1), 5–42.

Chalfen

(1987). Snapshot versions of life. Ohio: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.

Cohn

(1996). Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Derrida

(1996). Archive fever: A Freudian impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Elwin

(1964). The Tribal World of Verrier Elwin: An Autobiography. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Ginzburg

(1992). Clues, myths and the historical method. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.

10.

Grieveson

McCabe

(Eds) (2011). Film and the end of empire. London: BFI.

11.

Griffiths

(2002). Wondrous difference: Cinema, anthropology and turn-of-the-century visual culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

12.

Grigson

W. V.

(1938). The Maria Gonds of Bastar. London: Oxford University Press.

13.

Guha

(1999). Savaging the civilized: Verrier Elwin, his Tribals and India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

14.

Ishizuka

K. L.

Zimmermann

(2008). Mining the home movie: Excavations in histories and memories. Berkeley: University of California Press.

15.

Milward

(1948). Artist in unknown India. London: T Werner Laurie Limited.

16.

Pinney

(1997). Camera Indica: The social life of Indian photographs. London: Reaktion Books.

17.

Roning

F. T.

(1996). The third eye: Race, cinema and ethnographic spectacle. Durham: Duke University Press.

18.

Rushdie

(1984). Outside the whale. In Imaginary homelands (pp. 87–101). London: Granta 11.

19.

Sewell

G. H.

(1932). Amateur film making. London: Pitman.

20.

Sundar

(2007). Subalterns and sovereigns: Anthropological history of Bastar, 1854–2006. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

21.

Taussig

(2009). What color is the sacred? Chicago: Chicago University Press.

22.

Worth

Adair

(1972). Through Navajo eyes: An exploration in film communication and anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

23.

Zimmermann

(1995). Reel families: A social history of amateur film (arts and politics of the everyday). Berkeley: Indiana University Press.

At Home in the Empire: Reading Colonial Home Movies—The Hyde Collection (1928–1937)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References