The most successful period of circulation of Indian movies in Siam (Thailand) was from the 1950s to the 1970s. Vernacularizing them meant, in this case, transforming them into melodramatic cinema experience through the “versioning” art of the film narrators or voice performers. This article traces the enmeshment of popular Indian films within a local, plebeian cinema dispositive, in which film exhibition was subsumed under the paradigm of the oral and improvisatory theatrical entertainment. What became “melodramatic” about Indian (largely Hindi) movies as a result of their metamorphosis within this particular arrangement of technology, voice, text and bodies is the first question to address. The second is what it means now to redeem an experience of affective intensity occasioned by the circulation of Indian movies in Siam during the Cold War.
AkkharadetW. (2003a). Lakhon khon 1 (Human Drama 1). Bangkok: C.P. Book Standard.
2.
AkkharadetW. (2003b). Lakhon khon 2 (Human Drama 2). Bangkok: C.P. Book Standard.
3.
AndersonB. R. O’Gorman. (1985). Introduction. In O’G AndersonBenedict R.MendionesRuchira (Eds), In the mirror: Literature and politics in Siam in the American era (pp. 9–87). Bangkok: Duang Kamol.
4.
AndersonJ. L. (1988). Spoken silents in the Japanese cinema, essay on the necessity of Katsuben. Journal of Film and Video, 40(1, Winter), 13–21.
5.
Anonymous (2001). M. L. Ruchira “manut hok siang” (M.L. Ruchira “the Man with Six Voices”). In Film Versionist Association (Ed.), Terd kiat 108 pee borommakhru thid khiew (In Honour of the 108th Anniversary of Maestro Thid Khiew) (pp. 66–76). Bangkok: Film Versionist Association.
6.
Anonymous (1961). In Panyaphon ramleuk (Cremation volume in remembrance of Phen Panyaphon) (no pagination). Bangkok.
7.
BarméS. (2002). Woman, man, Bangkok: Love, sex, and popular culture in Thailand. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
BarméS. (1993). Luang Wichit Wathakan and the creation of a Thai Identity. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
9.
BoillatA. (2010). The lecturer, the image, the machine and the audio-spectator: The voice as a component part of audio-visual dispositives. In AlberaFrançoisTortajadaMaria (Eds), Cinema beyond film: media epistemology in the Modern era (pp. 215–232). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
10.
Chaijaroen. (2005). Khui fueng ruang nak phaak (Tales of the Versionist). Bangkok: Athit Sanit Chan.
11.
Chaijaroen. (2006). Nak phaak phu ying yai (The Great Versionists). Bangkok: Viratthanachai.
Department of Information, Ministry of Economic Affairs (1972). Rai ngan khana kammakarn seuksa ruang karn sang phapphayon thai lae karn nam phapphayon taan prathet kao ma chai nai prathet thai (Report of the research committee on Thai film production and importing films to Thailand).
14.
DymJ. A. (2003). Benshi, Japanese silent film narrators, and their forgotten narrative art of Setsumei: A history of Japanese silent film narration. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.
15.
EoseewongN. (2000). Paak kai lae bai ruea (Pen and sail). Bangkok: Praew Samnakphim.
16.
FouquetG. (2010). Of Genres and savours in Thai films. In DoraiswamyRashmiPadgaonkarLadtika (Eds), Asian Film Journeys: Selections from Cinemaya (pp. 446–453). New Delhi: Wisdom Tree.
17.
GaudreaultA. (2011). Film and attraction: From kinematography to cinema. Urbana, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
18.
GerowA. (2010). Visions of Japanese modernity: Articulations of cinema, nation, and spectatorship, 1895–1925. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
GunningT. (1986). The cinema of attractions: Early film, its spectator and the Avant-Garde. Wide Angle, 8(3–4), 63–70.
20.
HansenM. (2000). Fallen women, rising stars, new horizons: Shanghai silent film as vernacular modernism. Film Quarterly, 54(1), 10–22.
21.
HansenM. (1991). Babel and Babylon: Spectatorship in American silent film. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
22.
HansenM. (1997). Imagined uncommunity: The Lookjin middle class and Thai official nationalism. In ChirotDanielReidAnthony (Eds), Essential outsiders: Chinese and Jews in the modern transformation of Southeast Asia and Central Europe (pp. 75–98). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
KasetsiriC.SamranwetW. (1993). Phapphayon thai kap karn sang chat: Leuad thaharn thai-Phra jao chang pheuak-Baan rai na rao (Thai films and nation building: Blood of the Thai military, the king of the white elephant, our home and fields). Warasan Thammasat, 19(2), 89–112.
25.
KesslerF. (2006). The cinema of attractions as Dispositif. In StrauvenWanda (Ed.), The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded (pp. 57–69). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
26.
KhanM. (1957). Mother India. [Motion Picture]. India: Hindi.
27.
LacasseG. (2006). The lecturer and the attraction. In StrauvenWanda (Ed.), The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded (pp. 182–191). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
28.
LarkinB. (1997). Indian films and Nigerian lovers: Media and the creation of parallel Modernities. Africa, 67(3), 406–440.
29.
MulliganRobert (1962). To Kill a Mockingbird (Motion Picture). USA.
30.
MulliganRobert. (1995). Khwam lam leuk khong “nam nao” nai nang thai (The depth of “trashiness” in Thai films). In EoseewongNidhi, Khon, carabao, nam nao lae nang thai (Khon, Carabao, Melodrama and Thai Films) (pp. 78–96). Bangkok: Matichon.
31.
OsiriJ. (1999). Lok khong juri osiri (Juri Osiri’s World). Bangkok: Samnak Phim Saam See.
32.
PanyaphonP.PanyaphonU.PanyaphonD. (1961). Prawat chiwit khong phee phen (The biography of our brother Phen). In Panyaphon ramleuk (Cremation volume in remembrance of Phen Panyaphon) (no pagination). Bangkok.
33.
PhongpaichitP.BakerC. (1995). Thailand, economy and politics. Kuala Lumpur; New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
RawailH. S. (1963). Mere Mehboob. [Motion Picture]. India: Hindi.
35.
SaengthongD. (2007). Ngao see khao: phap muan nai wai raham khong sinlapin (The white shadow: A portrait of the artist in his turbulent years). Bangkok: Samanchon Books.
36.
SingerB. (2001). Melodrama and modernity: Early sensational cinema and its contexts. New York: Columbia University Press.
SittirakS. (2000). Kamnerd thorathat thai: phor sor 2493–2500 (The birth of television in Thailand, 1950–1957). Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.
39.
SukvongD. (1983). “Thid khiew” kap lok banterng thai (Thid Khiew and the Thai entertainment world). In NawigamuneAnakeSukvongDome (Eds), Manut palaad chat thai nai thong kham (Nai Thong Kham: A most unusual Thai man) (pp. 133–164). Bangkok: Muang Boran.
40.
“T.C.” (1959, June30). In a Lighter Vein. Bangkok Post.
41.
TejapiraK. (2001). Commodifying Marxism: The formation of modern Thai radical culture, 1927–1958. Kyoto and Melbourne: Kyoto University Press and Trans Pacific Press.
42.
ThirumughamM. A. (1971). Haathi mere saathi. [Motion Picture]. India: Hindi.
43.
ThomasR. (1989). Sanctity and scandal: The mythologization of Mother India. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 11(3), 11–30.
44.
UnnahathoopP. (1964, December8). Banterng rerng rom (Entertainment Delights). Siam Rath, pp. 14.
45.
VasudevanR. S. (2000). The politics of cultural address in a “transnational” cinema: A case study of Indian popular cinema. In GledhillChristineWilliamsLinda (Eds), Reinventing Film Studies (pp. 130–164). London: Arnold.
46.
WitayasakpanJ. (1992). Nationalism and the transformation of aesthetic concepts: Theater in Thailand during the Phibun period. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cornell University.
