Academic and popular literature suggest that multinational companies are more likely to be attracted to democratic regimes; they are generally seen as more reliable in honoring contracts compared to their undemocratic counterparts. On the flip side, some scholars claim that autocratic governments guarantee lower costs as they can more effectively suppress labor rights and are easier to negotiate with. Despite the existence of evidence for both claims, when all the arguments are considered, it is seen that the most attractive countries for foreign direct investment (FDI) have stable regimes and, hence, are predictable. This article aims to question the proposed relationship between democracy and FDI inflows and argue that the stability of the regime is what matters. Using a sample of developing and least-developed countries from 1970 to 2022, the study demonstrates that a fast-changing political decision-making environment is negatively associated with FDI inflows, while political regime variables do not have any significant impact on developing countries.
AhlquistJ. S. (2006). Economic policy, institutions, and capital flows: Portfolio and direct investment flows in developing countries. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 681–704. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4092799
AriasE., HollyerJ. R., & RosendorffB. P. (2018). Cooperative autocracies: Leader survival, creditworthiness, and bilateral investment treaties. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 905–921. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/I1HVCJ
4.
AsieduE., & LienD. (2011). Democracy, foreign direct investment and natural resources. Journal of International Economics, 84(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.12.001
5.
BastiaensI. (2016). The politics of foreign direct investment in authoritarian regimes. International Interactions, 42(1), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2015.1065699
6.
BütheT., & MilnerH. V. (2014). Foreign direct investment and institutional diversity in trade agreements: Credibility, commitment, and economic flows in the developing world, 1971–2007. World Politics, 66(1), 88–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887113000336
7.
CezarR., & EscobarO. R. (2015). Institutional distance and foreign direct investment. Review of World Economics, 151(4), 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-015-0227-8
8.
ChenK., NieH., & GeZ. (2019). Policy uncertainty and FDI: Evidence from national elections. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 28(4), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2018.1545860
9.
ChoiS.-W., & SamyY. (2008). Reexamining the effect of democratic institutions on inflows of foreign direct investment in developing countries. Foreign Policy Analysis, 4, 83–103.
CuiL., & MoonC. (2020). What attracts foreign direct investment into autocratic states? Regime time horizon and institutional design. World Economy, 43(10), 2762–2784. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12956
12.
DangT. A. (2015). Similarities attract: Political regimes and foreign direct investments. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, 03(02), 1000156. https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000156
13.
DriscollJ. C., & KraayA. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.
14.
FlintJ. E. (1973). Britain and the partition of West Africa. FlintJ. E. & WilliamsG.(Eds.), Perspectives of empire. Longman.
15.
GlaisterK. W., DriffieldN., & LinY. (2020). Foreign direct investment to Africa: Is there a colonial legacy? Management International Review, 60(3), 315–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-020-00415-w
16.
GoldsmithA. A. (2021). Political regimes and foreign investment in poor countries: Insights from most similar African cases. European Journal of International Relations, 27(3), 779–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661211002903
17.
GrahamB. A. T., JohnstonN. P., & KingsleyA. F. (2015). Even constrained governments steal: The domestic politics of transfer and expropriation risks. Blavatnik School of Government [Working paper series BSG-WP-2015/002]. Blavatnik School of Government: Oxford University. https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-05/BSG-WP-2015-002.pdf
18.
HaggardS. (1990). Pathways from the periphery: The politics of growth in the newly industrializing countries. Cornell University Press.
19.
HobsbawmE. J. (1989). The age of empire: 1875–1914. Vintage Books.
20.
JakobsenJ., & de SoysaI. (2006). Do foreign investors punish democracy? Theory and empirics, 1984–2001. KYKLOS, 59(3), 383–410.
JensenN. (2008). Political risk, democratic institutions, and foreign direct investment. Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1040–1052. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608081048
23.
JensenN. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57, 587–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/SOO20818303573O4O
24.
JulioB., & YookY. (2016). Policy uncertainty, irreversibility, and cross-border flows of capital. Journal of International Economics, 103, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.08.004
25.
KarnaneP., & QuinnM. A. (2019). Political instability, ethnic fractionalization and economic growth. International Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 435–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0393-3
26.
KaufmannD., KraayA., & MastruzziM. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3, 220–246.
27.
KimI. S., & MilnerH. V. (2020). Multinational corporations and their influence through lobbying on foreign policy. InWesselD., HinesJ., & FoleyC. Fritz(Eds.), Multinational corporations in a changing global economy. Brookings Institution.
28.
LacroixJ., MéonP. G., & SekkatK. (2021). Democratic transitions can attract foreign direct investment: Effect, trajectories, and the role of political risk. Journal of Comparative Economics, 49(2), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2020.09.003
29.
LiQ. (2006). Democracy, autocracy, and tax incentives to foreign direct investors: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00370.x
30.
LiQ. (2009). Democracy, autocracy, and expropriation of foreign direct investment. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1098–1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331723
31.
LiQ., & ResnickA. (2003). Reversal of fortunes: Democratic institutions and foreign direct investment inflows to developing countries. International Organization, 57, 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303571077
32.
MarshallM. G., & GurrT. R. (2020). Polity 5 project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2018. Dataset users’ manual. Center for Systemic Peace. https://www.google.com/search?q=extension%3A%2F%2Fefaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj%2Fhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.systemicpeace.org%2Finscr%2Fp5manualv2018.pdf&rlz=1C1GBSK_enIN1117IN1117&oq=extension%3A%2F%2Fefaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj%2Fhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.systemicpeace.org%2Finscr%2Fp5manualv2018.pdf&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBggAEEUYOzIGCAAQRRg7MgYIARBFGDrSAQc3NDdqMGo0qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
33.
MayerT., & ZignagoS. (2011). Notes on CEPII’s distance measures: The GeoDist database, CEPII[Working paper 2011–25]. https://www.cepii.fr/pdf_pub/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf
34.
MéonP. G., & SekkatK. (2012). FDI waves, waves of neglect of political risk. World Development, 40(11), 2194–2205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.022
35.
MoonC. (2015). Foreign direct investment, commitment institutions, and time horizon: How some autocrats do better than others. International Studies Quarterly, 59, 344–356.
36.
MoonC. (2019). Political institutions and FDI inflows in autocratic countries. Democratization, 26(7), 1256–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1627520
37.
NorthD. C., & WeingastB. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutional governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832.
38.
O’DonnellG. (1978). Reflections on the patterns of change in the bureaucratic-authoritarian state. Latin American Research Review, 13(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0023879100030661
39.
OkaraA. (2023). Does foreign direct investment promote political stability? Evidence from developing economies. Economic Modelling, 123, 106249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106249
40.
OlsonM. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. The American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567–576.
41.
OnealJ. R. (1994). The affinity of foreign investors for authoritarian regimes. Political Research Quarterly, 47(3), 565–588.
42.
ResnickA. L. (2001). Investors, turbulence, and transition: Democratic transition and foreign direct investment in nineteen developing countries. International Interactions, 27(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620108434991
43.
RobertsT. (2018). Economic policy, political constraints, and foreign direct investment in developing countries. International Interactions, 44(3), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2018.1448806
44.
RobertsonG. B., & TeitelbaumE. (2011). Foreign direct investment, regime type, and labor protest in developing countries. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00510.x
45.
RooneyB., & DiLorenzoM. (2021). Political turnover, regime type, and investment behavior. International Interactions, 47(4), 777–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2021.1898960
46.
RosendorffB. P., & ShinK. (2012). Importing transparency: The political economy of BITs and FDI flows (p. 42). New York University. https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/wp.nyu.edu/dist/4/1510/files/2015/03/RosendorffShinAPSA2012.pdf
47.
SinhaC., SahaS., & VasilevA. (2024). Institutional quality and US FDI outflows: Do political regimes matter? Economic Systems, 48(3), 101241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2024.101241
48.
SkaaningS.-E. (2021). Lexical index of electoral democracy (LIED) dataset v6.0. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WPKNIT
49.
SvedbergP. (1982). The profitability of U.K. foreign direct investment under colonialism. Journal of Development Economics, 11, 273–286.
50.
TsaiP.-L. (1994). Determinants of foreign direct investment and its impact on economic growth. Journal of Economic Development, 19(1), 137–163.
51.
TsebelisG. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 289–325.
52.
TwomeyM. J. (2000). A century of foreign investment in the third world. Routledge.
53.
WangZ. (2017). Democracy, policy interdependence, and labor rights. Political Research Quarterly, 70(3), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917704517
54.
World Bank. (2023). World development indicators. Available athttps://databank.worldbank.org/
55.
ZhengY. (2011). Credibility and flexibility: Political institutions, governance, and foreign direct investment. International Interactions, 37(3), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2011.596008
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
