Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are common investment tactics for corporate restructuring. They serve as dynamic strategies to improve firm performances by leveraging synergy benefits, economies of scale, acquisition premiums, market strength, positioning of new markets, risk reduction, and management integration, among other factors. Prior scholarly works present inadequate empirical evidence and analysis to examine if firms with strong IT capabilities should be the targets of M&As. To address this fundamental issue, we provide global evidence based on cross-country panel data between January 2002 and December 2021 for M&As with IT and non-IT specialized firms, along with an in-depth meta-analysis. Our results document that the market-based and accounting-based performances of M&As with IT firms are significantly higher than those of M&As with non-IT firms. M&As with IT firms have comparatively better financial stability, creditworthiness, and exposure to higher market value than corresponding M&As with non-IT firms. The study results and inferences are mostly consistent across all possible subsample analyses of cross-countries, group sizes, and crisis periods. Hence, M&As with IT affiliation possess comparatively higher value than M&As with non-IT sectors. This research study explores our understanding of dynamic corporate strategy and investment tactics in international business.
AhmedB., XieH., AliZ., AhmadI., & GuoM. (2022). Internationalization of emerging economies: Empirical investigation of cross-border mergers & acquisitions and greenfield investment by Chinese firms. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100200
2.
AiQ., & TanH. (2020). Uncovering neglected success factors in post-acquisition reverse capability transfer: Evidence from Chinese multinational corporations in Europe. Journal of World Business, 55(3), 101053.
3.
AlbuquerqueR., Brandão-MarquesL., FerreiraM. A., & MatosP. (2019). International corporate governance spillovers: Evidence from cross-border mergers and acquisitions. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(2), 738–770.
4.
AlmashhadaniM., & AlmashhadaniH. A. (2022). The beneficial of firm size, board size, ownership structure, and independence in developing markets’ firm performance: Evidence from Asia. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 11(7), 88–92.
5.
BauerF., & FrieslM. (2024). Synergy evaluation in mergers and acquisitions: An attention-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 61(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12804
6.
BediA. (2018). Post-acquisition performance of Indian telecom companies: An empirical study. Asia-Pacific Business Review, 11(2), 56–62.
7.
BhargaveH., & TandonD. (2023). How does Tobin’s Q respond to merger and acquisition announcements: Evidence of listed Indian firms. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2), 516–528.
8.
BrownL. W., LiouR. S., & HasijaD. (2023). Emerging market multinational corporations’ cross-border mergers and acquisitions and political distance: Does corporate political activity matter?Thunderbird International Business Review, 51(4), 1151–1190.
9.
ChangK., ChengX., WangY., LiuQ., & HuJ. (2023). The impacts of ESG performance and digital finance on corporate financing efficiency in China. Applied Economics Letters, 30(4), 516–523.
10.
ChemmanurT. J., LiL. A., & LiuM. H. (2024). Can mergers and acquisitions internalize positive externalities in funding innovation?Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 83, 102224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102224
ChenS., ChenY., ZhangD., & WangJ. (2023). Can minority investor activism promote corporate risk-taking? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 85(11), 41–52.
13.
ChiaramonteL., DreassiA., PiseràS., & KhanA. (2023). Mergers and acquisitions in the financial industry: A bibliometric review and future research directions. Research in International Business and Finance, 64, 101837.
14.
CummingD., JindalV., KumarS., & PandeyN. (2023). Mergers and acquisitions research in finance and accounting: Past, present, and future. European Financial Management, 11(2), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12417
15.
DattaD. K., BasuilD. A., & AgarwalA. (2020). Effects of board characteristics on post-acquisition performance: A study of cross-border acquisitions by firms in the manufacturing sector. International Business Review, 50(8), 101674–101689.
16.
DuaS. (2023). What motivates mergers and acquisitions in India?International Journal of the Economics of Business, 30(3), 293–314.
17.
DuanY., & JinY. (2019). Financial constraints and synergy gains from mergers and acquisitions. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 30(1), 60–82.
18.
Durango-GutiérrezM. P., Lara-RubioJ., & Navarro-GaleraA. (2023). Analysis of default risk in microfinance institutions under the Basel III framework. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(2), 1261–1278.
19.
GroysbergB., LeeJ., PriceJ., & ChengJ. (2018). The leader’s guide to corporate culture. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 44–52.
20.
GuM., LiD., & NiX. (2022). Too much to learn? The (un) intended consequences of RegTech development on mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 76, 102276–102297.
21.
GuptaB., & BanerjeeP. (2017). Impact of merger and acquisitions on financial performance: Evidence from selected companies in India. International Journal of Management and Business Research, 28(2), 14–19.
22.
GuptaI., MishraN., & TripathyN. (2023). Effect of synergy success and efficiency gains through mergers and acquisitions on research and development. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 12(4), 610–629.
23.
HossainM. S. (2022). Asset pricing puzzle: New evidence of fama-french five-factors in emerging market perspectives. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 30(3), 73–85.
24.
HossainM.S., & AktarR. (2018). Financial stability: An analysis & empirical evidence. International Journal of Business Research, 18(4), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.18374/IJBR-18-4.4
25.
HuangJ., & XieT. (2023). Technology centrality, bilateral knowledge spillovers and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 79(19), 102–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102366
26.
IshakN., ShaharH. K., & MohammadK. N. T. (2023). Government ownership and managers’ role: Effect to acquisition return among high technology companies. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 19(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2023.19.2.10
27.
JinG. Z., LecceseM., & WagmanL. (2023). How do top acquirers compare in technology mergers? New evidence from an SP taxonomy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 89, 102891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2022.102891
28.
KanekoK., & KajikawaY. (2023). Novelty score and technological relatedness measurement using patent information in mergers and acquisitions: Case study in the Japanese electric motor industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00330-z
29.
KeenanL., MonteathT., & WójcikD. (2022). Financial discipline through inter-sectoral mergers and acquisitions: Exploring the convergence of global production networks and the global financial network. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(8), 1532–1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221115739
30.
KijkasiwatP., HussainA., & MumtazA. (2022). Corporate governance, firm performance and financial leverage across developed and emerging economies. Risks, 10(10), 185–199.
31.
KimI., LeeS., & SharmaB. (2023). Competition law reform and firm performance: Evidence from developing countries. Emerging Markets Review, 56, 101050.
32.
KumarK. (2018). Impact of digitalization in finance & accounting. Journal of Accounting, Finance & Marketing Technology, 2(2), 1–9.
33.
LeeJ., & LeeJ. (2022). Enablers of post-acquisition joint knowledge creation: Evidence from joint patenting in high-tech mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(3), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2020-0846
34.
LewisY., & BozosK. (2019). Mitigating post-acquisition risk: The interplay of cross-border uncertainties. Journal of World Business, 54(5), 100996.
35.
MaaniJ., & RajkumarA. D. (2024). Future research directions of mergers and acquisitions in the banking sector: A review based on bibliometric analysis. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(1), 2024015–2024034.
36.
MedioliA., MarchiniP. L., & MazzaT. (2023). The impact of corruption and public governance quality on family firm business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(8), 212–264.
37.
PoddarS., JhanjhariN., & GuruprasadM. (2023). Awareness of merger and acquisition amongst finance mergers in India. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 9(1), 278–288.
38.
RaoU., & MishraT. (2020). Posterior analysis of mergers and acquisitions in the international financial market: A re-appraisal. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101062.
39.
RenneboogL., & VansteenkisteC. (2019). Failure and success in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 650–699.
40.
SahuS. K., & AgarwalN. (2017). Inter-firm differences in mergers and acquisitions: A study of pharmaceutical sector in India. Journal of Economic Studies, 1(1), 202–232.
41.
SmeuldersD., DekkerH. C., & Van den AbbeeleA. (2019). Information availability in acquisition decisions: The role of prior relations and rival bidders. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 25(22), 131–155.
42.
TaoF., LiuX., GaoL., & XiaE. (2017). Do cross-border mergers and acquisitions increase short-term market performance? The case of Chinese firms. International Business Review, 26(1), 189–202.
43.
TestoniM. (2022). The market value spillovers of technological acquisitions: Evidence from patent-text analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 43(5), 964–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3355
44.
WangJ., YuanX., HuangX., LiuC., & ZhangP. (2024). Can digitalization facilitate cross-border M&A? Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102118–102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102118
45.
WuC., YuX., & ZhengY. (2020). The spillover effect of financial information in mergers and acquisitions. The British Accounting Review, 11(1), 145–163.
46.
XiaoH. (2022). The impact of cross-border mergers and acquisitions on competitors’ innovation: Evidence from Chinese firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(12), 1479–1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1963700
47.
XuJ. (2017). Growing through the merger and acquisition. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 80(13), 54–74.
48.
YanS., LeeJ. Y., & JosephsonB. W. (2023). The effect of customer asset strategies on acquisition performance in business-to-government markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, (1), 202–232.
49.
ZhaoY., LiD., HuangJ., & ZhaoL. (2024). Information transmission effect of forward-looking text: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions report of Chinese listed firms. Applied Economics Letters, 25(5), 1–7.
50.
ZhengH., & MaoM. Q. (2024). Fintech mergers and acquisitions. Journal of International Money and Finance, 9(1), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103076
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
