This study investigates how the quality of economic governance impacts corporate research and development (R&D) investment in Vietnam. We use the Provincial Competitiveness Index (PCI) to gauge economic governance quality. Our findings indicate that improved economic governance encourages firms to invest more in R&D. This conclusion remains consistent when using two different measures of R&D investment and employing propensity score matching to address the endogeneity issue. Moreover, the effect of the business environment on innovation is moderated by the size of the firm and the stock exchange on which it is listed. Our findings hold significance as governments in developing countries strive to boost firm innovation, a crucial driver of economic advancement.
AlamA., UddinM., & YazdifarH. (2019). Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 34–44.
2.
AlamM.R., KitengeE., & BedaneB. (2017). Government effectiveness and economic growth. Economics Bulletin, 37(1), 222–227.
3.
AyyagariM., Demirgüç-KuntA., & MaksimovicV. (2011). Firm innovation in emerging markets: The role of finance, governance, and competition. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1545–1580.
4.
BaiJ., JayachandranS., MaleskyE. J., & OlkenB. A. (2019). Firm growth and corruption: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. The Economic Journal, 129(618), 651–677.
5.
BhattacharyaU., HsuP. H., TianX., & XuY. (2017). What affects innovation more: Policy or policy uncertainty?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(5), 1869–1901.
6.
BloomN., SchankermanM., & Van ReenenJ. (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81(4), 1347–1393.
7.
ChenD., LiS., XiaoJ. Z., & ZouH. (2014). The effect of government quality on corporate cash holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 27, 384–400.
8.
ChoiS. B., LeeS. H., & WilliamsC. (2011). Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 40(3), 441–452.
9.
CohenW. M., & KlepperS. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 232–243.
10.
DaksaM. D., YismawM. A., LemessaS. D., & HundieS. K. (2018). Enterprise innovation in developing countries: An evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(6), 1–19.
11.
DokasI., PanagiotidisM., PapadamouS., & SpyromitrosE. (2023). Does innovation affect the impact of corruption on economic growth? International evidence. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 1030–1054.
12.
DuttaS., & LanvinB. (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2013: The local dynamics of innovation. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/economics/gii/gii_2013.pdf
13.
EllisJ., SmithJ., & WhiteR. (2020). Corruption and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(7), 2124–2149.
14.
FanJ. P., RuiO. M., & ZhaoM. (2008). Public governance and corporate finance: Evidence from corruption cases. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(3), 343–364.
15.
FangV. W., TianX., & TiceS. (2014). Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation?The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2085–2125.
16.
GalassoA., & SimcoeT. S. (2011). CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science, 57(8), 1469–1484.
17.
GanJ., GuoY., & XuC. (2018). Decentralized privatization and change of control rights in China. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(10), 3854–3894.
18.
GuadalupeM., KuzminaO., & ThomasC. (2012). Innovation and foreign ownership. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3594–3627.
19.
HaschkaR. E., HerwartzH., StruthmannP., TranV. T., & WalleY. M. (2022). The joint effects of financial development and the business environment on firm growth: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Comparative Economics, 50(2), 486–506.
20.
HeJ., & TianX. (2018). Finance and corporate innovation: A survey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 47(2), 165–212.
21.
HsuP. H., TianX., & XuY. (2014). Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(1), 116–135.
22.
HuntingtonS. P. (1968). Modernization and corruption. In Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
23.
JiaN., HuangK. G., & Man ZhangC. (2019). Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: An examination of state-owned enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 220–247.
24.
KhannaT., & PalepuK. G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press.
25.
KesslerE. H., BierlyP. E., & GopalakrishnanS. (2000). Internal vs. external learning in new product development: Effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage. R&D Management, 30(3), 213–224.
26.
LeffN. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8–14.
LuongH., MoshirianF., NguyenL., TianX., & ZhangB. (2017). How do foreign institutional investors enhance firm innovation?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(4), 1449–1490.
29.
MaleskyE. J. (2008). Straight ahead on red: How foreign direct investment empowers sub-national leaders. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 97–119.
30.
MaleskyE. (2022). Decentralization and economic development in Vietnam. In Routledge handbook of contemporary Vietnam. Routledge.
31.
MeyerK. E., & NguyenH. V. (2005). Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 63–93.
32.
Misi LopesL. E., PackhamN., & WaltherU. (2023). The effect of governance quality on future economic growth: An analysis and comparison of emerging market and developed economies. SN Business & Economics, 3, 108.
33.
MurphyK. M., ShleiferA., & VishnyR. W. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 503–530.
34.
NamP. X., & ThanhT. T. (2021). Effects of bribery on firms’ environmental innovation adoption in Vietnam: Mediating roles of firms’ bargaining power and credit and institutional constraints. Ecological Economics, 185, 107042.
35.
NguyenN. A., DoanQ. H., NguyenN. M., & Tran-NamB. (2016). The impact of petty corruption on firm innovation in Vietnam. Crime, Law and Social Change, 65(4), 377–394.
36.
NguyenT. G., & NguyenM. (2023). Stock liquidity and firm innovation: The role of investor protection and external finance dependency. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4510260
37.
NguyenT. T., & Van DijkM. A. (2012). Corruption, growth, and governance: Private vs. state-owned firms in Vietnam. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(11), 2935–2948.
38.
OvtchinnikovA. V., RezaS. W., & WuY. (2020). Political activism and firm innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(3), 989–1024.
39.
PorterM. E. (1992). Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system. Harvard Business Review, 70(5), 65–82.
40.
SabirS., RafiqueA., & AbbasK. (2019). Institutions and FDI: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Financial Innovation, 5(1), 1–20.
41.
ShenC. H. H., & ZhangH. (2018). Tournament incentives and firm innovation. Review of Finance, 22(4), 1515–1548.
42.
ShuT., TianX., & ZhanX. (2022). Patent quality, firm value, and investor underreaction: Evidence from patent examiner business. Journal of Financial Economics, 143(3), 1043–1069.
43.
SolowR. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320.
44.
TongL., LiuN., ZhangM., & WangL. (2018). Employee protection and corporate innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 569–589.
45.
TsaiK. H., & WangJ. C. (2005). Does R&D performance decline with firm size?—A re-examination in terms of elasticity. Research Policy, 34(6), 966–976.
46.
VarsakelisN. C. (2006). Education, political institutions and innovative activity: A cross-country empirical investigation. Research Policy, 35(7), 1083–1090.
47.
YanY., XuX., & LaiJ. (2021). Does Confucian culture influence corporate R&D investment? Evidence from Chinese private firms. Finance Research Letters, 40, 101719.
48.
YangZ. (2013). Do political connections add value to audit firms? Evidence from IPO audits in China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(3), 891–921.
49.
ZhangJ. (2018). Public governance and corporate fraud: Evidence from the recent anti-corruption campaign in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 375–396.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
