By conducting a cluster analysis for the period 1990–2014, this study compares the sustainable development performance of China’s economic transition with 41 other countries in transition. While the previous studies mainly used economic indicators as a comparison factor, this study uses economic, social, and environmental indicators, which are the three main pillars of sustainable development. The cluster analysis results indicate that China shows the most remarkable improvement in terms of sustainable development. The improvement was the largest among the other transition countries. In particular, the social and environmental sectors have improved significantly. Through further improvement in the economic sector, China would be the most successful transition country in sustainable development performance.
CaiF.GarnautC. R.SongL. (2018). 40 years of China’s reform and development: How reform captured China’s demographic dividend. In GarnautR.SongL.CaiF. (Eds.), China’s 40 years of reform and development 1978–2018 (pp. 5–25). Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
2.
CamposN. F. (2001). Will the future be better tomorrow? The growth prospects of transition countries revisited. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29, 663–676.
3.
DabrowskiM. (1996). Different strategies of transition to market economy: How do they work in practice?(World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1579). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
4.
de MeloM.DenizerC.GelbA. (1996). From plan to market: Patterns of transition (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1564). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
5.
de MeloM.DenizerC.GelbA.TenevS. (2001). Circumstance and choice: The role of initial conditions and policies in transition countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 15, 1–31.
6.
EverittB. S.LandauS.LeeseM.StahlD. (2011). Cluster analysis (5th ed.). London, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
7.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). (1994–2018). Transition report. London, UK: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
8.
FalcettiE.LysenkoT.SanfeyP. (2005). Reforms and growth in transition: Re-examining the evidence (EBRD Working Paper 90). London, UK: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
9.
FischerS.SahayR.VéghC. A. (1996). Stabilization and growth in transition countries: The early experience. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2), 45–66.
GarnautR. (2018). 40 years of Chinese economic reform and development and the challenge of 50. In GarnautR.SongL.CaiF. (Eds.), China’s 40 years of reform and development 1978–2018 (pp. 29–51). Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
12.
HammP.KingL. P.StucklerD. (2012). Mass privatization, state capacity, and economic growth in post-communist countries. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 295–324.
13.
HavrylyshynO.RoodenR. V. (2003). Institutions matter in transition, but so do policies. Comparative Economic Studies, 45, 2–45.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2000). World economic outlook: Focus on transition countries. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
16.
KangS. J.JungT. Y. (2017). Economic-transition and North Korea: From the perspective of sustainable development. Seoul, Korea: Korea University Press (In Korean).
QianY. (2000). The process of China’s market transition (1978–1998): The evolutionary, historical, and comparative perspectives. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 156(1), 151–171.
19.
SachsJ.ZinnesC.EilatY. (2000). Patterns and determinants of economic reform in transition countries: 1990–1998 (Consulting Assistance on Economic Reform (CAER) II Discussion Paper 61). Massachusetts, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.
20.
StataCorp LLC. (2015). Stata multivariate statistics reference manual: Release 14. Texas, USA: Stata Press. Retrieved from http://www.stata.com/manuals14/mv.pdf
21.
The World Bank. (2002). Transition: The first ten years: Analysis and lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
WardJ. H.Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.
26.
WhyteM. K. (2009). Paradoxes of China’s economic boom. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 371–392.
27.
WooW. T. (1999). The economics and politics of transition to an open market economy: China (OECD Development Centre Working Paper No. 153). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
28.
WuJ. (2005). Understanding and interpreting Chinese economic reform. Singapore: Texere Press and Thomson-South Western.
29.
Yale University. (2015). Environment performance index. Retrieved from http://epi.yale.edu
30.
ZhangP.NanY. (2018). China’s economic growth and structural transition since 1978. China Economist, 13(1), 22–57.
