A Study on the Two-way Causal Relationship Between Industrial Structure Evolution and Economic Growth: Empirical Test Based on 40 Years of Reform and Opening-up in China

Abstract

The adjustment of industrial structure is an important engine driving the economic growth. The relationship between industrial structure evolution and economic growth is characterized by various stages. The article uses the data of 31 provincial units in China from 1978 to 2016 as a sample, divided into five stages with time as nodes, and takes the rationalization and optimization of industrial structure (OIS) as indicators to measure the adjustment of industrial structure. The main research conclusions are obtained through cointegration test, Granger test and simultaneous equation model. Results indicate that the relationship between OIS and economic growth shows the characteristics of mutual influence, while the rationalization of industrial structure unilaterally affects economic growth. Rationalization of industrial structure has significantly stimulated economic growth, especially in the past 10 years after China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The stimulating effect of OIS on China’s economic growth has not yet been fully demonstrated. This indicates that the OIS, as a new momentum of economic growth, has not yet been brought into presently in China. Economic growth has a driving effect on the OIS. However, it is only when the economic development enters a relatively mature stage can this driving effect be gradually brought into play.

Keywords

Rationalization of industrial structure optimization of industrial structure economic growth simultaneous equation model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barro

R. J.

Sala-i-Martin

(2004). Economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Baumol

W. J.

(1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review, 57(3), 415–426.

Bjork

G. C.

(1999). The way it worked and why it won’t. London, UK: Praeger.

Brunner

A. D.

(2003). The long-run effects of trade on income and income growth (IMF Working Paper No. 03/37). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Buera

F. J.

Kaboski

J. P.

(2009). The rise of the service economy. American Economic Review, 102(6), 2540–2569.

Chen

Jefferson

G. H.

Zhang

(2011). Structural change, productivity growth and industrial transformation in China. China Economic Review, 22(1), 133–150.

Chenery

Robinson

Syrquin

(1986). Industrialization and growth: A comparative study. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Fabricant

(1942). Employment in manufacturing, 1899–1939: An analysis of its relation to the volume of production(M). New York, NY: American Book-Stratford Press.

Fan

S. G.

Zhang

X. B.

Robinson

(2002). Structural change and economic growth in China. China Economic Quarterly, 2(1), 181–198.

10.

Feridun

Olusi

J. O.

Folorunso

B. A.

(2006). Analyzing the impact of globalization on economic development in developing economies: an application of Error Correction Modelling (Ecm) to Nigeria. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 6(6),173-182.

11.

Frankel

J. A.

Romer

D. H.

(1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399.

12.

L. H.

(2010). An empirical research on industry structure and economic growth. Statistical Research, 27(8), 79–81.

13.

Gan

C. H.

Zheng

R. G.

(2009). An empirical study on change of industrial structure and productivity growth since the reform and opening-up: A test for the structure-bonus hypotheses from 1978 to 2007 in China. China Industrial Economics, (2), 55–65.

14.

Gan

C. H.

Zheng

R. G.

D. F.

(2011). An empirical study on the effects of industrial structure on economic growth and fluctuations in China. Economic Research Journal, 46(5), 4–16, 31.

15.

Huang

L.X.

Y. L.

(2015). Changes in industrial structure during the time of economic growth—Learning from American experience. Economic Geography, 35(3), 23–27

16.

Jiang

Z. H.

Bai

(2006). Analysis on connotation and influencing factors of industrial structure upgrade. Contemporary Economic Research, (10), 53–56.

17.

Jorgenson

D. W.

Timmer

M. P.

(2011). Structural change in advanced nations: A new set of stylized facts. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(1), 1–29.

18.

Lin

Y. F.

Cai

(1998). Analysis of regional disparity in China’s economic transition period. Economic Research Journal, 33(6), 5–12.

19.

Liu

S. R.

(2005). Industrial structure and economic growth. China Industrial Economy, (5), 14–21.

20.

Liu

Zhang

(2008). Structural change and technical advance in China’s economic growth. Economic Research Journal, 43(11), 4–15.

21.

Zhou

S. L.

(1999). Upgrading of China’s industrial structure and transformation of economic growth mode. Management World, 15(1), 113–125.

22.

Maddison

(2006). The world economy. Paris: OECD Publishing.

23.

Rostow

W. W.

(1988). From takeoff to sustained growth economics. Chengdu: Sichuan People Press.

24.

Saccone

Valli

(2009). Structural change and economic development in China and India. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 6(1), 101–119.

25.

Singh

Cortuk

(2010). Structural change and growth in India. Economics Letters, 110(3), 178–181.

26.

Z. D.

Jin

J. Z.

Wang

X. H.

(2012). Whether ‘structure-bonus’ phenomenon appears during the change of Chinese industrial structure? An empirical research based on the dynamic shift-share method. Finance & Economics, (2), 63–70.

27.

Syrquin

Chenery

(1989). Three decades of industrialization. World Bank Economic Review, 3(2), 145–181.

28.

Tian

Yang

J. Z.

(2012). An empirical analysis of how Chinese Outward Direct Investment affects its rationalization of industrial structure. Journal of Central South University (Social Science), 18(5), 160–164.

29.

J. L.

(2008). The choice of china growth mode (the Enlarged Edition). Shanghai: Shanghai Yuan Dong Press.

30.

Yang

J. W.

(2008). Industrial economics. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.

31.

B. B.

(2015). Economic growth effects of industrial restructuring and productivity improvement: Analysis of dynamic spatial panel model with Chinese city data. China Industrial Economics, (12), 83–98.

32.

G. S.

Zhu

W. H.

(2012). Study on mutual promotion relationships between trade opening and financial opening in China: Empirical study based on simultaneous equations. Journal of Wenzhou University (Natural Sciences), 33(2), 36–42.

33.

Yuan

H. N.

(2009). Health and income of migrant workers in cities: Evidence from the survey of migrant workers in Beijing. Management World, 25(5), 56–66.

34.

Yuan

F. H.

(2012). Structural accelerating and structural decelerating in the long run growth: An exposition. Economic Research Journal, 47(3), 127–140

35.

Zhang

(2006). Fiscal decentralization and political centralization in China: Implications for growth and inequality. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(4), 713–726.

36.

Zheng

R. G.

Gan

C. H.

D. F.

(2010). The industrial structure and institutional effects of economic growth in China’s transition period: An analysis based on a stochastic frontier model. China Industrial Economics, (2), 58–67.

37.

Zhu

C. L.

(2010). Research on the regional character of China’s industry’s capital deepening and its employment effect: Discussion on the solution under fiscal decentralization system. Nankai Economic Studies, (5), 125–139.