Rapid economic growth over the past decade was the main driver of poverty reduction. However, due to the global market turmoil, growth in recent times has slowed and ground may be lost in poverty reduction. An important question for the sustainability of growth is: Has the world become more equal or unequal with globalisation? The evidence on trends in inequality is dependent on the normative judgments and measurements used. However, there has been rising inequality within countries. The greater the degree of income inequality, the lower the impact of growth on poverty reduction. This makes growth, equality of income and poverty reduction important considerations when formulating development strategies. Reform of trade, productivity, and human capital have had positive implications for growth, employment, and equality. Trade liberalisation has proven to both increase growth and reduce inequality. Education inequality is closely related to increasing growth and reducing poverty. Jobs are the most sustainable way to reduce poverty. Complementary measures are also needed to ensure that financial reforms take place, labour markets function well, there is free movement of people and goods and services and natural resources are used in a sustainable way.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahuja, Vinod , Benu Bidani , Francisco Ferreira and Michael Walton . 1997. Everyone's Miracle: Revisiting Poverty and Inequality in East Asia. Washington DC: World Bank .
2.
Ali, Ifzal . 2007. ‘Pro-Poor to Inclusive Growth: Asian Prescriptions’, ERD Policy Brief Series No. 48. Manila: Asian Development Bank .
3.
Attanasio, Orazio , Erich Battistin , Emla Fitsimons , Alice Mesnard and Marcos Vera-Hernandez . 2005. ‘How Effective Are Conditional Cash Transfers? Evidence from Colombia’, IFS Briefing Note 54. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies .
4.
Asian Development Bank. 2007. Inequality in Asia. Key Indicators 2007 Special Chapter. Manila: Asian Development Bank .
5.
Benabou, Roland . 1996. ‘Inequality and Growth’, NBER Working Papers. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
6.
Besley, Timothy and Robin Burgess . 2003. ‘ Halving Global Poverty ’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3): 3–22 .
7.
Bourguignon, François and Christian Morrisson . 2002. ‘ Inequality Among World Citizens: 1920–92 ’, American Economic Review, 92(4): 727–44 .
8.
Bourguignon, François , Victoria Levin and David Rosenblatt . 2006. ‘Global Redistribution of Income’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
9.
Bourguignon, François , Francisco H.G. Ferreira , Marta Menéndez . 2007. ‘ Inequality of Opportunity in Brazil ’, Review of Income and Wealth, 53(4): 585–618 .
10.
Chaudhuri, Shubham and Martin Ravallion . 2006. ‘Partially Awakened Giants: Uneven Growth in China and India’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
11.
Chen, Shaohua and Martin Ravallion . 2004. ‘How Have the World's Poorest Fared since the Early 1980s?’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
12.
Chen, Shaohua and Martin Ravallion . 2008. ‘China is Poorer than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight against Poverty’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
13.
Chhibber, Ajay and Gaurav Nayyar . 2006. ‘Explaining the Cross-Country Variation in the Growth Elasticity of Poverty’, Independent Evaluation Group. Washington DC: World Bank .
14.
DECPG. 2007. Personal communication with Development Prospects Group, 30 January 2007.
15.
Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire . 1996. ‘ A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality ’, The World Bank Economic Review, 10(3): 565–91 .
16.
Dollar, David . 2007. ‘Poverty, Inequality and Social Disparities during China's Economic Reform’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
17.
Dollar, David and Aart Kraay . 2004. ‘ Trade, Growth, and Poverty ’, The Economic Journal, 114: F22–F49 .
18.
Ferreira, Francisco H.G. and Martin Ravallion . 2008. ‘Global Poverty and Inequality: A Review of the Evidence’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
19.
Ferreira, Francisco H.G. , Phillippe G. Leite and Martin Ravallion . 2007. ‘Poverty Reduction without Economic Growth? Explaining Brazil's Poverty Dynamics, 1985–2004’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
20.
Gertler, Paul . 2004. ‘ Do Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Child Health? Evidence from PROGRESA's Control Randomized Experiment ’, American Economic Review, 94(2): 336–41 .
21.
Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA). 2006. On the Recent Fall in Income Inequality in Brasil. Technical Note.
22.
IMF. 2007. World Economic Outlook 2007: Globalization and Inequality. Washington DC: IMF .
23.
Independent Evaluation Group (IEG). 2006. Annual Review of Development Effectiveness 2006: Getting Results. Washington DC: World Bank .
24.
Independent Evaluation Group (IEG). 2007. Development Results in Middle Income Countries: An Evaluation of the World Bank's Support. Washington DC: World Bank .
25.
Jorgenson, Dale W. and Khuong Vu . 2005. ‘ Information Technology and the World Economy ’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(4): 631–50 .
26.
Kanbur, Ravi . 2008. ‘Globalization, Growth, and Distribution: Framing the Questions’, Working Paper No. 5. Washington DC: Commission on Growth and Development .
27.
Kraay, Aart . 2005. ‘ When is Growth Pro-poor? Evidence from a Panel of Countries ’, Journal of Development Economics, 80: 198–227 .
28.
Krugman, Paul . 1994. ‘ The Myth of Asia's Miracle ’, Foreign Affairs, 73(6): 62–78 .
29.
Lopez, Ramon E. , Vinod Thomas and Yan Wang . 2008. ‘The Quality of Growth: Fiscal Policies for Better Results’, Independent Evaluation Group Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
30.
Milanovic, Branki . 2006. ‘Global Income Inequality: What it is and Why It Matters’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
31.
Page, John M.1994. ‘ The East Asian Miracle: An Introduction ’, World Development, 22(4): 615–25 .
32.
Ravallion, Martin . 1997. ‘ Can High-quality Developing Countries Escape Absolute Poverty? ’, Economics Letters, 56: 51–7 .
33.
Ravallion, Martin . 2001. ‘ Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Looking Beyond Averages ’, World Development, 29(11): 1803–15 .
34.
Ravallion, Martin . 2003. ‘The Debate on Globalization, Inequality and Poverty: Why Measurement Matters’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
35.
Ravallion, Martin . 2004. ‘Competing Concepts of Inequality and the Globalization Debate’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
36.
Ravallion, Martin , Shaohua Chen and Prem Sangraula . 2007. ‘New Evidence on the Urbanization of Global Poverty’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
37.
Ravallion, Martin and Michael Lokshin . 2004. ‘Gainers and Losers from Trade Reform in Morocco’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank .
38.
Rawlings, Laura B. and Gloria M. Rubio . 2005. ‘ Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs ’, World Bank Research Observer, 20(1): 29–56 .
39.
Skoufias, Emannuael . 2005. ‘PROGRESA and Its Impacts on Welfare of Rural Households in Mexico’, Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute .
40.
Skoufias, Emmanuel , Davis Benjamin , and Sergio De La Vega . 2001. ‘ Targeting the Poor in Mexico: An Evaluation of the Selection of Households into PROGRESA ’, World Development, 29(10): 1769–84 .
41.
Stiglitz, Joseph E.1996. ‘ Some Lessons from the East Asian Miracle ’, The World Bank Research Observer, 11(2): 151–77 .
42.
Thomas, Vinod and Peter Stephens . 1994. ‘The Evolving Role of the World Bank: The East Asian Economic Miracle’, Report No. 13533. Washington DC: World Bank .
43.
Thomas, Vinod , Mansoor Dailami , Ashok Dhareshwar , Daniel Kaufmann , Nalin Kishor , Ramon Lopez and Yan Wang . 2000. The Quality of Growth. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank .
44.
Thomas, Vinod . 2006. From Inside Brazil: Development in a Land of Contrasts. Washington DC: The World Bank .
45.
United Nations. 1997. ‘Trade and Development Report, 1997’, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. New York: United Nations .
46.
United Nations University. 2008. World Income Inequality Database V2.0c May 2008. See http://www.wider.unu.edu/research/Database/en_GB/database/ (Accessed June 2008).
47.
Wan, Guanghua , Ming Lu , and Zhao Chen . 2006. ‘ The Inequality-Growth Nexus in the Short and Long Run: Empirical Evidence from China ’, Journal of Contemporary Economics, 34(4): 654–67 .
48.
World Bank. 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Washington DC: World Bank .
49.
World Bank. 2003. Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean: Breaking From History?Washington DC: World Bank .
50.
World Bank. 2008a. Global Monitoring Report 2008 MDGs and the Environment: Agenda for Inclusive and Sustainable Development. Washington DC: World Bank .
51.
World Bank. 2008b. World Development Indicators. Washington DC: World Bank . http://go.worldbank.org/U0FSM7AQ40 (Accessed).
52.
World Bank. 2009. PovCal Net Online Poverty Analysis Tool. See http://go.worldbank.org/NT2A1XUWP0 (Accessed June 2008).
53.
Young, Alwyn . 1995. ‘ The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience ’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3): 641–80 .
54.
Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire . 1998. ‘ New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth ’, Journal of Development Economics, 57: 259–87 .
55.
Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire . 2005. World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development. Washington DC: World Bank .
56.
Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire . 2006. Doing Business 2007: How to Reform. Washington DC: World Bank .
57.
Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire . 2007. Poverty Reduction and Growth: Virtuous and Vicious Circles. Washington DC: World Bank .
