As organisations increasingly seek to promote environmental sustainability through green human resource management (GHRM), understanding the role of corporate governance in fostering employee environmental behaviours becomes crucial. Prior research suggests that corporate governance mechanisms, particularly ethical leadership (EL), play a vital role in building employee trust and commitment towards environmental initiatives, yet this relationship remains understudied in emerging economies. This study examines how EL and GHRM shape employee green behaviour (EGB) through psychological ownership in the Indian context. Using data collected from 343 employees and employing partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM), the analysis is divided into two sections: a measurement model to ensure accuracy and validity, and a structural model to test hypotheses. Results revealed that EL and GHRM practices account for 62% of the variance in psychological green climate (PGC) and 58% in green behaviour. Notably, psychological ownership was found to partially mediate the relationship between PGC and green behaviour. This study contributes significantly to leadership and sustainability literature, while offering actionable insights for organisations promoting pro-environmental behaviours among employees. The findings provide a foundation for future research in organisational environmental management and the development of more effective sustainability strategies.
AdnanN., BhattiO. K., & FarooqW. (2020). Relating ethical leadership with work engagement: How workplace spirituality mediates? Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1739494. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1739494
2.
AfsarB., CheemaS., & JavedF. (2018). Activating employee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1506
3.
AhmedM., ZehouS., RazaS. A., QureshiM. A., & YousufiS. Q. (2020). Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee well-being. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2225–2239.
4.
AlyahyaM., AliedanM., AgagG., & AbdelmoetyZ. H. (2023). The antecedents of hotels’ green creativity: The role of green HRM, environmentally specific servant leadership, and psychological green climate. Sustainability, 15(3), 2629. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032629
5.
AndersonR. C., & WhiteR. H. (2011). Business lessons from a radical industrialist. St. Martin’s Press.
6.
Ángel del BríoJ., JunqueraB., & OrdizM. (2008). Human resources in advanced environmental approaches–A case analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 46(21), 6029–6053.
7.
ArditoL., & DangelicoR. M. (2018). Firm environmental performance under scrutiny: The role of strategic and organisational orientations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1470
8.
AshforthB. E., & MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
9.
BassB. M., & Bass BernardM. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
10.
BiswasS. R., UddinM. A., BhattacharjeeS., DeyM., & RanaT. (2022). Ecocentric leadership and voluntary environmental behavior for promoting sustainability strategy: The role of psychological green climate. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1705–1718. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2978
11.
BoiralO., TalbotD., & PailléP. (2015). Leading by example: A model of organisational citizenship behavior for the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 532–550.
12.
BoudreauJ. W., & RamstadP. M. (2005). Talentship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20054
13.
BrownM. E., TreviñoL. K., & HarrisonD. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.
14.
ChaudharyR. (2020). Green human resource management and employee green behavior: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 630–641.
15.
ChenY. S., & ChangC. H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107–119.
16.
ChouC.-J. (2014). Hotels’ environmental policies and employee personal environmental beliefs: Interactions and outcomes. Tourism Management, 40, 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.08.001
17.
ChouinardY., & StanleyV. (2012). The responsible company: What we’ve learned from Patagonia’s first 40 years. Patagonia Books.
18.
ChurchillG. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.
19.
ClarkL. A., & WatsonD. (2016). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.
20.
ÇopS., OlorunsolaV. O., & AlolaU. V. (2021). Achieving environmental sustainability through green transformational leadership policy: Can green team resilience help? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 671–682.
21.
DarvishmotevaliM., & AltinayL. (2022). Green HRM, environmental awareness and green behaviors: The moderating role of servant leadership. Tourism Management, 88, 104401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104401
22.
DawkinsS., TianA. W., NewmanA., & MartinA. (2017). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 38(2), 163–183.
23.
DhimanN., AroraN., DograN., & GuptaA. (2019). Consumer adoption of smartphone fitness apps: An extended UTAUT2 perspective. Journal of Indian Business Research, 12(3), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-05-2018-0158
24.
DumontJ., ShenJ., & DengX. (2017). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613–627.
25.
ErcantanO., & EyupogluS. (2022). How do green human resource management practices encourage employees to engage in green behavior? Perceptions of university students as prospective employees. Sustainability, 14(3), 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031718
26.
FarooqM. S., SalamM., JaafarN., FayolleA., AyuppK., Radovic-MarkovicM., & SajidA. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2016-0015
27.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
28.
FreezeR., & RaschkeR. L. (2007). An assessment of formative and reflective constructs in IS research. ECIS 2007 Proceedings.
29.
GoldA. H., MalhotraA., & SegarsA. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organisational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669.
30.
GravesL. M., SarkisJ., & ZhuQ. (2013). How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 81–91.
31.
GuaranaC. L., & AvolioB. J. (2022). Unpacking psychological ownership: How transactional and transformational leaders motivate ownership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211066072
32.
HairJ. F., SarstedtM., MatthewsL. M., & RingleC. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I—Method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094
33.
HawkenP., LovinsA. B., & LovinsL. H. (1999). Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. Little, Brown.
34.
HenselerJ., HubonaG., & RayP. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
35.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
36.
HoffmanA. J. (2018). The next phase of business sustainability. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16(2), 34–39.
37.
HolmeR., & WattsP. (2000). Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense. World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
38.
HuL. T., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
39.
IqbalQ., HassanS. H., AkhtarS., & KhanS. (2018). Employee’s green behavior for environmental sustainability: A case of banking sector in Pakistan. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 15(2), 118–130.
40.
IqbalS., AkhtarS., AnwarF., KayaniA. J., SohuJ. M., & KhanA. S. (2021). Linking green innovation performance and green innovative human resource practices in SMEs; A moderation and mediation analysis using PLS-SEM. Current Psychology, 42, 11250–11267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02403-1
41.
IraniF., KiliçH., & AdesholaI. (2022). Impact of green human resource management practices on the environmental performance of green hotels. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(5), 570–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.2022554
42.
IslamM. S., FerdousM. Z., & PotenzaM. N. (2020). Panic and generalized anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic among Bangladeshi people: An online pilot survey early in the outbreak. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.049
43.
JiangM., WangH., & LiM. (2019). Linking empowering leadership and organisational citizenship behavior toward environment: The role of psychological ownership and future time perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–13.
44.
JonesM. S., TeelT. L., SolomonJ., & WeissJ. (2021). Evolving systems of pro-environmental behavior among wildscape gardeners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 207, 104018.
45.
KhanN. U., ChengJ., YasirM., SaufiR. A., NawiN. C., & BazkiaeiH. A. (2022). Antecedents of employee green behavior in the hospitality industry. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.836109
46.
KimA., KimY., HanK., JacksonS. E., & PloyhartR. E. (2017). Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335–1358.
47.
KimY. J., KimW. G., ChoiH. M., & PhetvaroonK. (2019). The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, 83–93.
48.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
49.
LangeF., & DewitteS. (2019). Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 92–100.
50.
LevillainK., & SegrestinB. (2019). From primacy to purpose commitment: How emerging profit-with-purpose corporations open new corporate governance avenues. European Management Journal, 37(5), 637–647.
51.
LiM., AbidinR. Z. U., QammarR., QadriS. U., KhanM. K., MaZ., QadriS., AhmedH., KhanH. S. U. D., & MahmoodS. (2023). Pro-environmental behavior, green HRM practices, and green psychological climate: Examining the underlying mechanism in Pakistan. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1067531
52.
LülfsR., & HahnR. (2013). Corporate greening beyond formal programs, initiatives, and systems: A conceptual model for voluntary pro-environmental behavior of employees. European Management Review, 10(2), 83–98.
53.
LuuT. T. (2023). Leveraging green human resource management to drive employee green behavior in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(3), 1024–1050.
54.
MatilainenA., Pohja-MykraM., LahdesmakiM., & KurkiS. (2017). ‘I feel it is mine!’ Psychological ownership concerning natural resources. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 31–45.
55.
MishraP. (2023). Green human resource management and environmental performance: Examining the role of green innovation and environmental strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(2), 1026–1040.
56.
MurphyM. J., & SmolarskiJ. M. (2020). Religion and CSR: An Islamic ‘political’ model of corporate governance. Business & Society, 59(5), 823–854.
57.
NazS., JamshedS., NisarQ. A., & NasirN. (2021). Green HRM, psychological green climate and pro-environmental behaviors: An efficacious drive towards environmental performance in China. Current Psychology, 42, 1–16.
58.
NazS., JamshedS., NisarQ. A., & NasirN. (2023). Green HRM, psychological green climate and pro-environmental behaviors: An efficacious drive towards environmental performance in China. Current Psychology, 42(2), 1346–1361.
59.
NembhardI. M., & EdmondsonA. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966.
60.
NisarQ. A., HaiderS., AliF., GillS. S., & WaqasA. (2022). The role of green HRM on environmental performance of hotels: Mediating effect of green self-efficacy & employee green behaviors. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 25, 1–34.
61.
NortonT. A., ParkerS. L., ZacherH., & AshkanasyN. M. (2015). Employee green behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organisation & Environment, 28(1), 103–125.
62.
NortonT. A., ZacherH., & AshkanasyN. M. (2014). Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 49–54.
63.
NortonT. A., ZacherH., ParkerS. L., & AshkanasyN. M. (2017). Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: The role of green psychological climate. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 38(7), 996–1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2178
64.
OnesD. S., & DilchertS. (2012). Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 5(4), 444–466.
65.
OzbozkurtO. B., InceM., & YesilkusF. (2022). Does psychological ownership affect green organisational behavior? PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 138–157.
66.
PierceJ. L., KostovaT., & DirksK. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.
67.
QuanD., TianL., & QiuW. (2022). The study on the influence of green inclusive leadership on employee green behaviour. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5292184
68.
RamusC., & StegerU. (2000). The role of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee ’ecoinitiatives’ at leading edge European companies. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 605–626. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556357
69.
RazaS. A., & KhanK. A. (2022). Impact of green human resource practices on hotel environmental performance: The moderating effect of environmental knowledge and individual green values. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(6), 2154–2175.
70.
RenS., TangG., & JacksonS. E. (2018). Green human resource management research in emergence: A review and future directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3), 769–803.
71.
RenwickD. W. S., JabbourC. J. C., Muller-CamenM., RedmanT., & WilkinsonA. (2016). Contemporary developments in Green (environmental) HRM scholarship. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 114–128.
72.
RenwickD. W. S., RedmanT., & MaguireS. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14.
73.
SabokroM., MasudM. M., & KayedianA. (2021). The effect of green human resources management on corporate social responsibility, green psychological climate and employees’ green behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127963
74.
SarkaP., & DuttaS. K. (2023). Green human resource management practices and employee green behavior: The mediating role of green organisational culture. International Journal of Manpower, 44(3), 563–583.
75.
SchneiderB., EhrhartM. G., & MaceyW. H. (2013). Organisational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 361–388.
76.
SiddiquiW. (2023). Corporate governance and sustainable business practices: A win-win approach. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/corporate-governance-sustainable-business-practices-win-win-siddiqui
77.
SussenbachS., & KamleitnerB. (2018). Psychological ownership as a facilitator of sustainable behaviors. In PeckJ., ShuS. B. (Eds), Psychological ownership and consumer behavior. Springer.
78.
TamV. W. (2008). On the effectiveness in implementing a waste-management-plan method in construction. Waste Management, 28(6), 1072–1080.
79.
TawfikA. F., El-AshryA. M., MahgoubS. A. E., & MohamedS. H. (2024). Mediation of psychological ownership between green human resources management and nursing faculty’s green behavior. International Nursing Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12979
80.
TeoT. S. H., SrivastavaS. C., & JiangL. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
81.
TianH., ZhangJ., & LiJ. (2020). The relationship between pro-environmental attitude and employee green behavior: The role of motivational states and green work climate perceptions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(7), 7341–7352.
82.
TrevinoL. K., Den NieuwenboerN. A., & Kish-GephartJ. J. (2014). (Un) ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 635–660.
83.
Unilever. (2021). Annual report and accounts 2021: Purpose-led, future-fit. https://www.unilever.com/investor-relations/annual-report-and-accounts/
84.
UnsworthK. L., DmitrievaA., & AdriasolaE. (2013). Changing behaviour: Increasing the effectiveness of workplace interventions in creating pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 34(2), 211–229.
85.
Van DyneL., & Pierce J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organisational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 25(4), 439–459.
86.
Varela-CandamioL., Novo-CortiI., & García-ÁlvarezM. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1565–1578.
87.
WallsJ. L., BerroneP., & PhanP. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913.
88.
WalumbwaF. O., MayerD. M., WangP., WangH., WorkmanK., & ChristensenA. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204–213.
89.
WangX., ZhouK., & LiuW. (2018). Value congruence: A study of green transformational leadership and employee green behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1946.
90.
WangZ., ZhangB., & ZengH. (2022). The effect of environmental regulation on green technology innovation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 130286.
91.
WaqasM., YahyaF., AhmedA., RasoolY., & HongboL. (2021). Unlocking employee’s green behavior in fertilizer industry: The role of green HRM practices and psychological ownership. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 24(5), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2020.0109
92.
WigginsJ. (2018). Can consumers perceive collective psychological ownership of an organisation? In Psychological ownership and consumer behavior (pp. 177–194). Springer.
93.
YeJ., ZhangX., ZhouL., WangD., & TianF. (2022). Psychological mechanism linking green human resource management to green behavior. International Journal of Manpower, 43(3), 844–861.
94.
YongJ. Y., YuslizaM. Y., JabbourC. J. C., & AhmadN. H. (2020). Exploratory cases on the interplay between green human resource management and advanced green manufacturing in light of the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity theory. Journal of Management Development, 39, 31–49.
95.
YounisZ., & HussainS. (2023). Green transformational leadership: Bridging the gap between green HRM practices and environmental performance through green psychological climate. Sustainable Futures, 6, 100140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100140
96.
ZafarH., & SusenoY. (2024). Examining the effects of green human resource management practices, green psychological climate, and organisational pride on employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior. Organisation & Environment, 37, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266241241532
97.
ZhaoH., & ZhouQ. (2019). Exploring the impact of responsible leadership on organisational citizenship behavior for the environment: A leadership identity perspective. Sustainability, 11(4), 944.
98.
ZhouL., ZhaoS., TianF., ZhangX., & ChenS. (2018). Visionary leadership and employee creativity in China. International Journal of Manpower, 39(1), 93–105.
99.
ZhouS., ZhangD., LyuC., & ZhangH. (2018). Does seeing ‘mind acts upon mind’ affect green psychological climate and green product development performance? The role of matching between green transformational leadership and individual green values. Sustainability, 10(9), 3206.
100.
ZientaraP., & ZamojskaA. (2018). Green organisational climates and employee pro-environmental behaviour in the hotel industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7), 1142–1159.
