Impact of Board Diversity on Agency Costs in the Context of Agency Theory Approach: Evidence From Listed Companies in Sri Lanka

Abstract

Effective corporate governance leads the way towards aligning the interest between managers and shareholders. Effectiveness of practicing the corporate governance of companies in Sri Lanka is debatable topic due to the variation between standard and actual practices. This study aims to examine the influence of board diversity on agency costs of companies listed in Sri Lanka as proposed by agency theory. The sample of this research consists of all companies listed in Sri Lanka, exclusive of bank and financial institutions which are practicing unique governance practices issued by Central Bank of Sri Lanka. The final sample consists of 180 companies during the period from 2013 to 2019. This study deployed panel regression analysis to test the relationship formulated in the hypotheses by using the EViews 9 software. The results showed that the board diversity-related variables such as separate leadership structure and presence of non-executive director on companies’ board are appeared to have significant influence on agency costs. Meanwhile, board size does not have direct impact on agency costs. The findings of this study regarding board diversity and agency costs have important managerial implications, that these findings are unlikely to the prediction of agency theory and best practices. Agency theory is not applicable to these companies, since the exiting corporate governance practices increase agency costs. The potential benefits of this study led to re-think the board of directors of the companies, managers, shareholder and the policymakers to re-organise the implementation of best practices.

Keywords

Board diversity corporate governance agency costs agency theory Colombo Stock Exchange theory and practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Azeez

A. A.

(2015). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Finance and Bank Management , 3(1), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.15640/jfbm.v3n1a16

Baltagi

B. H.

Levin

(1986). Estimating dynamic demand for cigarettes using panel data: The effect of bootlegging, taxation and advertising reconsidered. The Review of Economics and Statistics , 68(1), 148–155.

Berle

Means

(1932). The modern corporation and private property . Macmillan.

Committee

Cadbury

(1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance . Gee Publishing London.

Chilosi

Damiani

(2007). Stakeholders Vs. shareholders in corporate governance [MPRA Paper No. 2334]. Munich Personal RePEC Archive . https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2334/

Denis

D. K.

McConnell

J. J.

(2003). International corporate governance. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , 38(1), 1–36.

Dharmadasa

Gamage

Herath

S. K.

(2014). Corporate governance, board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of South Asian Development , 21(1), 8–31.

Dissabandara

D. B. P. H.

(2012). How is the current view of Japanese corporate governance? A snapshot of the present corporate governance in Japan. Journal of the Graduate School of Business Administration , 24, 89–127.

Donaldson

Davis

J. H.

(1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns, Australian Journal of Management , 16(1), 49–65.

10.

Elston

J. A.

Goldberg

L. G.

(2003). Executive compensation and agency costs in Germany. Journal of Banking & Finance , 27(7), 1391–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00274-1

11.

Fama

E. F.

(1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy , 88(2), 288–307.

12.

Fama

E. F.

Jensen

M. C.

(1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics , 26(2), 327–349.

13.

Fleming

Heaney

McCosker

(2005). Agency costs and ownership structure in Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal , 13(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.04.001

14.

Florackis

(2008). Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence for UK firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance , 4(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130810837375

15.

Florackis

Ozkan

(2004). Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence for UK firms . Seminar of University of York, European Finance Association Meetings. https://www.efmaefm.org/0EFMSYMPOSIUM/2005/papers/29-Aydin_Ozkan_paper.pdf

16.

Garanina

Kaikova

(2016). Corporate governance mechanisms and agency costs: Cross-country analysis. The International Journal of Business in Society , 16(2), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG04-2015-0043

17.

Gul

Sajid

Razzaq

Afzal

(2012). Agency cost, corporate governance and ownership structure (the case of Pakistan). International Journal of Business and Social Science , 3(9), 268–277.

18.

Gunathilake

Chandrakumara

P. M. K. A.

Zoysa

A. D.

(2011). Corporate governance in Sri Lanka: The status quo. Global Research in Business & Economics , 97–117. https://ro.uow.edu.au/gsbpapers/174

19.

Hausman

J. A.

(1978). Specification test in econometrics. Econometrica , 46(6), 1251–1272.

20.

Henry

(2006). Agency costs, corporate governance and ownership structure: Evidence from Australia . School of Business La Trobe University.

21.

Jensen

M. C.

(1993). The modern industrial revolution, exist and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance , 48(3), 831–880.

22.

Jensen

M. C.

Meckling

W. H.

(1976). Theory of firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics , 3(4), 305–360.

23.

Kalainathan

Vijayarani. (2014). Corporate governance practices, issues and challenges in Sri Lanka [Conference session]. The second international conference on global business economics, finance and social sciences (GB14 Chennai conference).

24.

Karasneh

H. A.

Bataineh

(2018). Does corporate governance reduce agency costs in the Jordanian industrial companies? International Review of Management and Business Research , 7(2), 615–625.

25.

Kiel

G. C.

Nicholson

G. J.

(2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance [Conference session]. 5th International Conference on Corporate Governance and Direction at the Centre for Board Effectiveness, Henley Management College, pp. 189–205.

26.

Lei

Lin

Wei

(2013). Types of agency cost, corporate governance and liquidity. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy , 32(3), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.02.008

27.

Levin

Lin

C. F.

Chu

C. S. J.

(2002). Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics , 108(1), 1–22.

28.

McKnight

P. J.

Weir

(2009). Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance , 49(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2007.09.008

29.

Mustapha

Ahmad

A. C.

(2011). Agency theory and managerial ownership: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal , 26(5), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111129571

30.

Nam

S. W.

Nam

I. C.

(2004). Corporate governance in Asia: Recent evidence from Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand . Asian Development Bank Institute.

31.

Nguyen

A. H.

Doan

D. T.

Nguyen

L. H.

(2020). Corporate governance and agency costs: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , 13(5), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13050103

32.

Premepeh

K. B.

Odartei-Mills

(2015). Corporate governance structure and shareholder wealth maximization. SK International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Hub , 2(3), 8–30.

33.

Reddy

Locke

(2014). The relationship between ownership structures, capital structure and corporate governance practices. International Journal of Managerial Finance , 10(04), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-12-2012-0130

34.

Roudaki

Bhuiyan

M. B. U.

(2015). Interlocking directorship in New Zealand. Australian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal , 9(3), 45–58.

35.

Senaratne

Gunaratne

P. S. M.

(2008). Corporate governance development in Sri Lanka: Prospects and problem [Conference session]. International Research Conference on management and finance, University of Colombo.

36.

Shaifali Mittal

R. K.

(2019). Agency problems and corporate governance mechanisms in Indian companies. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering , 8(8S3), 607–613.

37.

Siddiqui

M. F.

Razzaq

Malik

Gul

(2013). Internal corporate governance mechanisms and agency cost: Evidence from large KSE listed firms. European Journal of Business and Management , 5(23), 103–109.

38.

Singh

Davidson

W. N.

(2003). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking & Finance , 27(5), 793–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00260-6

39.

Tchouassi

Nosseyamba

B. O.

(2011). Corporate governance and maximization of shareholder value: Theoretical analysis from Francophone countries in Africa. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research , 3(6), 198–206.

40.

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka & Securities and Exchange Commission of Sri Lanka. (2013). Code of Best Practice on Corporate Governance 2013 . https://cdn.cse.lk/pdf/Corporate_Governance_Code_2013_book.pdf

41.

Zogning

(2017). Agency theory: A critical review. European Journal of Business and Management , 9(2), 1–8.