Stewardship Theory of Corporate Governance and Value System: The Case of a Family-owned Business Group in India

Abstract

Stewardship theory of corporate governance is a normative alternative to agency theory. This article argues that the stewardship behaviour of managers results in exemplary corporate governance practices when the espoused values of the firm are aligned with the enacted values. The case study method is used to prove this argument by studying corporate governance practices in a family-owned business group in India. The Murugappa Group is a 100-year-old family-owned business group, known for their ethical practices and currently managed by the fourth-generation family members, without undergoing any split. The espoused as well enacted values of the group are studied and corporate governance practices of the group firms analysed in this article. The article focuses on the governance structure of the group, its succession planning practices and the ownership structure. The analysis indicates that aligning the enacted values with the espoused value helped the group to adapt itself to the changing external economic environment and continue creating shareholder value, the essence of corporate governance.

Keywords

Stewardship theory espoused values family business India corporate governance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agarwal

(2001). Murugappa group restructures management . Retrieved from http://www.domain-b.com/companies/companies_m/murugappa/20010423_restructures.html

Ang

J. S.

Cole

R. A.

Lin

J. W.

(2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. The Journal of Finance , 55(1), 81–106.

Beckhard

Dyer

W. G.

(1983). Managing continuity in the family-owned business. Organizational Dynamics , 12(1), 5–12.

Bobb

. (1981, March 31). Big business families: The new barons. India Today . Retrieved from http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/big-business-families-new-generation-seems-poised-to-embrace-far-wider-corporate-horizons/1/401666.html

Daly

J. P.

Pouder

R. W.

Kabanoff

(2004). The effects of initial differences in firms’ espoused values on their postmerger performance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 40(3), 323–343.

Das

M. K.

(1999, November 18). Professional vs family management. The Indian Express . Retrieved from http://expressindia.indianexpress.com/fe/daily/19991118/fed18047.html

Davis

Frankforter

Vollrath

Hill

(2007). An empirical test of stewardship theory. Journal of Business & Leadership: Research, Practice, and Teaching (2005–2012), 3(1), 4–50.

Davis

J. H.

Schoorman

F. D.

Donaldson

(1997). Davis, Schoorman, and Donaldson reply: The distinctiveness of agency theory and stewardship theory. Academy of Management Review , 22(3), 611–613.

DelCampo

R. G.

(2006). The influence of culture strength on person–organization fit and turnover. International Journal of Management , 23(3), 465–469.

10.

Donaldson

Davis

J. H.

(1989). CEO governance and shareholder returns: Agency theory or stewardship theory . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.

11.

Donaldson

Davis

J. H.

(1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management , 16(1), 49–64.

12.

Dyer

W. G.

(1989). Integrating professional management into a family owned business. Family Business Review , 2(3), 221–235.

13.

Donaldson

Davis

J. H.

(1994). Potential contributions of organizational behavior to the study of family-owned businesses. Family Business Review , 7(2), 109–131.

14.

Gedajlovic

Lubatkin

M. H.

Schulze

W. S.

(2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies , 41(5), 899–912.

15.

Greenwood

Hinings

C. R.

(1993). Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal , 36(5), 1052–1081.

16.

Jalan

P. K.

(2005). Business Environment & Challenges of Poverty Alleviation in India, Encyclopedia of Economic Development (Vol. 2). New Delhi: Sarup & Sons.

17.

Jensen

M. C.

Meckling

(1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics , 3(4), 305–360.

18.

Kabanoff

Daly

(2002). Espoused values of organisations. Australian Journal of Management , 27(Suppl. 1), 89–104.

19.

Kaplinsky

(1997). India’s industrial development: An interpretative survey. World Development , 25(5), 681–694.

20.

Khilnani

N. M.

(1993). Socio-political dimensions of modern India . New Delhi: MD Publications.

21.

Krishnan

R. T.

Reddy

M. C.

Srinivasan

V. K.

Jaiswal

(2011). The leadership journey at the Murugappa group, leadership development in organizations in India: The why and how of it (Part II). Vikalpa , 36(4), 104–110.

22.

Marie Schuh

Miller

G. M.

(2006). Maybe Wilson was right: Espoused values and their relationship to enacted values. International Journal of Public Administration , 29(9), 719–741.

23.

Mohan

Chopra

Ray

Sethi

(2001). Alcohol consumption in India: A cross sectional study. In Room

Demers

Bourgault

(Eds.), Surveys of drinking patterns and problems in seven developing countries (pp. 103–114). Geneva: World Health Organization.

24.

Mohan

Aggarwal

(1990). Commands and controls: Planning for Indian industrial development, 1951–1990. Journal of Comparative Economics , 14(4), 681–712.

25.

Muth

Donaldson

(1998). Stewardship theory and board structure: A contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review , 6(1), 5–28.

26.

Ramachandran

(2006). Indian family business: Their survival beyond three generations (Working paper series). Hyderabad: Indian School Business.

27.

Ramachandran

(2015). The 10 commandments for family business . New Delhi: SAGE Publishing.

28.

Ramaswamy

Petitt

B. S.

(2012). Why do business groups continue to matter? A study of market failure and performance among Indian manufacturers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management , 29(3), 643–658.

29.

Ramnath

N. S.

(2009). We missed out on the IT sector. Forbes India. Retrieved from http://www.forbesindia.com/interview/exit-interview/we-missed-out-on-the-it-sector/7432/1

30.

Ramnath

N. S.

(2011). Special report on richest Indians. Forbes India. Retrieved from http://www.forbesindia.com/article/richest-indians-11/a-vellayan-as-long-as-there-is-growth-theres-no-problem/29912/1

31.

Ramanathan

Leena

S. B.

(2012). Boards should engage in value creation: Vellayan . Retrieved from http://www.livemint.com/Companies/3gne9hdPKVo0c3hSzVMaBM/Boards-should-engage-in-value-creation-Vellayan.html

32.

Rokeach

(1979). From individual to institutional values: With special reference to the values of science. In Rokeach

Milton

(Eds.), Understanding human values, individual and societal (pp. 47–70). New York, NY: The Free Press.

33.

Schein

E. H.

(1985). How culture forms, develops and change. In Kilman

P. H.

Saxton

M. J.

Serpa

Associates (Eds.), Gaining control of the corporate culture (pp. 17–43). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

34.

Schein

E. H.

(2006). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 356). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

35.

Shleifer

Vishny

(1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance , 52(2), 737–783.

36.

Stewart

(2003). Help one another, use one another: Toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 27(4), 383–396.

37.

Stoner

C. R.

(1989). The foundations of business ethics: Exploring the relations. SAM Advanced Management Journal , 54(3), 3843.

38.

Subramanian

(2009). Ethical values of the Murugappa group: A case study. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance , 8(2), 56–60.

39.

Tagiuri

Davis

(1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review , 9(2), 199–208.

40.

Taylor

Levy

Boyacigiller

N. A.

Beechler

(2008). Employee commitment in MNCs: Impacts of organizational culture, HRM and top management orientations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management , 19(4), 501–527.

41.

Vallejo

M. C.

(2009). The effects of commitment of non-family employees of family firms from the perspective of stewardship theory. Journal of Business Ethics , 87(3), 379–390.

42.

Ward

J. L.

(1997). Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices. Family Business Review , 10(4), 323–337.

43.

Ward

J. L.

(2002). Murugappa group . Retrieved from http://www.campdenfb.com/article/murugappa-group

44.

Ward

J. L.

Zsolnay

C. A.

(2004). The Murugappa group: Centuries old business heritage and tradition . Evanston, IL: Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.