This study explores the role of employment protection legislation (EPL) in wage determination using a state-level panel dataset for India’s formal manufacturing sector. Unlike previous studies, we create a quantitative indicator of EPL using state-wise court judgements (on labour disputes), citing various sections of Chapters 5A and 5B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, particularly those dealing with employment and wage-related legislations. Our findings suggest that pro-worker court judgements specifically on wage-related issues lead to an increase in the share of wages in industrial output. The findings are robust to alternative model specifications. However, we find that the share of wages responds negatively to an increase in pro-worker strictness in the overall EPL. We also analyse the consequences of labour market dualism, which is increasingly becoming a norm even in formal sectors. Using insights from labour market segmentation theory, we argue that a divergence in the regulation between regular and contract labour has a potential to undermine the success of active labour market policies in curbing the ill-effects of market segmentation.
AdhvaryuA., ChariA. V., & SiddharthS. (2014). Firing costs and flexibility: Evidence from firms’ employment responses to shocks in India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 725–740.
2.
AhsanA., & PagesC. (2009). Are all labor regulations equal? Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1), 62–75.
3.
AnantT. C. A., HasanR., MohapatraP., NagarajR., & SasikumarS. K. (2006). Labor markets in India: Issues and perspectives. In FelipeJ. & HasanR. (Eds), Labor Markets in Asia (pp. 205–300). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230627383_5
4.
BasuK. (1995). Do India’s labor laws hurt Indian laborers? A theoretical investigation, Center for Analytical Economics (CAE) (Working Paper No. 95–12). Cornell University.
5.
BelotM. B. J., & OursJ. V. (2007). Welfare improving employment protection. Economica, 74, 381–396.
6.
BertolaG. (1990). Job security, employment, and wages. European Economic Review, 34(4), 851–856.
7.
BesleyT., & BurgessR. (2004). Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91–134.
8.
BhattacharjeaA. (2006). Labour market regulation and industrial performance in India: A critical review of the empirical evidence. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 49(2), 211–232.
9.
BhattacharjeaA. (2020). Labour market flexibility in Indian manufacturing: A critical survey of the literature. International Labour Review, 160(2), 197–217.
10.
BhattacharjeaA. (2021). Labour market flexibility in Indian manufacturing: A critical survey of the literature. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3745120
11.
ChaureyR. (2015). Labour regulations and contract labor use: Evidence from Indian firms. Journal of Development Economics, 114(3), 224–232.
12.
DeakinS. (2013). Addressing labour market segmentation: The role of labour law (Working Paper No. 52). International Labour Organization.
13.
DeakinS., & SarkarP. (2011). Indian labour law and its impact on unemployment, 1970–2006: A Leximetric study (Working Paper No. 428). Centre for Business Research University of Cambridge.
14.
DoughertyS., FrisanchoV., & KrishnaK. (2013/2014). State-level labor reform and firm-level productivity in India, India Policy Forum (Vol. 10, pp. 1)–56). Brookings–National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER).
15.
FragenasS. (2010). Labour law, judicial efficiency, and informal employment in India. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(1), 282–321.
16.
FrancesconiM., & BoothA. L. (2013). Labour as a buffer: Do temporary workers suffer?https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/20821/1/dp673.pdf.
17.
GaribaldiP. (1998). Job flow dynamics and firing restrictions. European Economic Review, 42(2), 245–275.
18.
GoldarB., & AggarwalS. C. (2012). Informalization of industrial labor in India: Effects of labor market rigidities and import competition. The Developing Economies, 50(2), 141–169.
19.
GoswamiD., & PaulS. (2021). Labor reforms in Rajasthan: A boon or bane?https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3740558
20.
GreeneW. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th edition). Pearson.
21.
GuptaP., RanaH., & UtsavK. (2008/2009). Big reforms but small payoffs explaining the weak record of growth and employment in Indian manufacturing. India Policy Forum (Vol. 5, pp. 59)–108). Brookings–National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER).
22.
HasanR., MehtaA., & SundaramA. (2021). The effects of labor regulation on firms and exports: Evidence from Indian apparel manufacturing. Journal of Comparative Economics, 49(1), 183–200.
23.
HausmanJ. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.
24.
HeckmanJ. J., & PagesC. (2000). The cost of job security regulation: Evidence from Latin American labor markets (Working Paper No. 7773). National Bureau of Economic Research.
25.
HeywoodJ. S., O’MahonyM., SiebertW. S. & Rincon-AznarA. (2018). The impact of employment protection on the industrial wage structure. IZA Discussion Papers No. 11788, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn.
26.
HopenhaynH., & RogersonR. (1993). Job turnover and policy evaluation: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 915–938.
27.
JenkinsR. (1999). Democratic politics and economic reform in India. Cambridge University Press.
28.
KannanK. P. (1999). Political economy of labour and development in Kerala. Economic & Political Weekly, 33(52), L61–L70.
29.
KapoorR. (2014). Creating good jobs: Assessing the labor market regulation debate. Economic & Political Weekly, 49(46), 16–18.
30.
LechthalerW. (2008). The interaction of firing cost and firm training. Empirica, 36, 331–350.
31.
LeontaridiM. (1998). Segmented labour markets: Theory and evidence,Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(1), 103–109.
32.
LindbeckA., & SnowerD. J. (1987). Union activity, unemployment persistence and wage-employment ratchets. European Economic Review, 31, 157–167.
33.
MaitiD. (2013). Contractualisation and productivity growth in formal sector: Theory and evidence from Indian manufacturing. School of Economics, University of South Pacific Laucala.
34.
MitraD., & UralB. P. (2006). Indian manufacturing: A slow sector in a rapidly growing economy. Journal of International Trade and Economy Development, 17(4), 525–559.
35.
NagarajR. (2004). Fall in organized manufacturing employment: A brief note. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(30), 3387–3390.
36.
NickellS. J. (1986). Dynamic models of labor demand. Handbook of Economics, 1, 473–522.
37.
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2007). Economic Survey. India. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-surveys-india-2007_eco_surveys-ind-2007-en
38.
RoyK. R., DubeyA., & RamaiahS. (2020). Labour market flexibility and changes in employment: Spatial and temporal evidence from Indian manufacturing. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(1), 81–98.
39.
RoychowdhuryA. (2014). The labour market flexibility debate in India: Re-examining the case for signing voluntary contracts. International Labour Review, 153(3), 473–487.
40.
RoychowdhuryA. (2018). Do labour laws and rising real wages explain employment stagnation in the organized manufacturing sector of India? An empirical investigation. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 7(1), 1–27.
41.
SahaB., SenK., & MaitiD. (2013). Trade openness, labour institutions, and flexibilisation: Theory and evidence from India. Labor Economics, 24, 180–195.
42.
SapkalR. S. (2016). Labour law, enforcement and the rise of temporary contract workers: Empirical evidence from India’s organized manufacturing sector. European Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 157–182.
43.
SchwabD. (2020). Labour protection laws and the Drain on productivity: Evidence from India. Review of Development Economics, 24(1), 383–401.
44.
SinghJ., DebK. D., KumarA., & PrateekK. (2019). Factors influencing the decisions to Hire contract labour by Indian manufacturing firms. Oxford Development Studies, 47(4), 406–419.
45.
SinghB. (2022). Contractualisation in India’s manufacturing industry and the economic reforms of the early 1990s: An analysis based on ASI data. International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 16(1), 135–157.
46.
SofiI. A., & SharmaP. (2015a). Labour laws and informalisation of employment: Panel evidences form Indian formal manufacturing sector. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 6(1), 65–84.
47.
SofiI. A., & SharmaP. (2015b). Does employment protection legislation matter in dualistic labor market? Panel evidence from Indian manufacturing sector. Labor Studies Journal, 40(2), 149–168.
48.
SofiI. A., KhanM. I., KunrooM. H., & KhachooA. Q. (2016). Labour market regulations and in-formalisation of migrant worker: Evidence from Indian manufacturing sector. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 7(2), 169–195.
49.
SofiI. A., & KunrooM. S. (2018). Demand shocks and employment adjustment: Does employment protection legislation create rigidity. International Labour Review, 157(3), 461–480.
50.
SoodA., NathP., & GhoshS. (2014). Deregulating capital, regulating labour: The dynamics in the manufacturing sector in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 49(26 & 27), 58–68.
51.
World Bank. (2008). Doing business: An independent evaluation report. World Bank.
