Australia has one of the highest per capita carbon emissions, and its energy sector contributes significantly to the country’s carbon emissions. Renewable energy and climate change call for a shift from fossil fuels to low-carbon technologies for energy production. Policies aiming to reduce carbon emissions are perceived by many people as leading to higher living costs, but changes in energy policies can also lead to economic gains in the presence of revenue recycling. This article applies a computable general equilibrium approach to study the effect of energy tax in the Australian economy. Four different scenarios of green tax reform (GTR) are simulated to test the employment double dividend (EDD) potential. All four scenarios simulate changes in energy tax and one of four tax revenue recycling policies including (a) value added tax reduction, (b) payroll tax reduction, (c) goods and services tax (GST) reduction and (d) a mixture of all three recycling policies. The results show strong EDD potential of GST and payroll tax reduction when used along with energy tax in a revenue-neutral GTR approach. The study also presents a comparison of an optimal EDD inducive policy design between the European and Australian GTR approaches.
ABS (2015). Australian National Accounts: Input-output tables, 2012–13. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/5209.0.55.001Main+Features12012-13?OpenDocument
2.
ABS (2019). Australian demographic statistics. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/3101.0
3.
AdamsP. D. (2007). Insurance against catastrophic climate change: How much will an emissions trading scheme cost Australia?Australian Economic Review, 40(4), 432–452.
4.
AkterS., & BennettJ. (2011). Household perceptions of climate change and preferences for mitigation action: The case of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in Australia. Climatic Change, 109(3–4), 417–436.
5.
AngerN., BöhringerC., & LöschelA. (2010). Paying the piper and calling the tune? A meta-regression analysis of the double-dividend hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1495–1502.
6.
AnwarM. R., Li LiuD., FarquharsonR., MacadamI., AbadiA., FinlaysonJ., WangB., & RamilanT. (2015). Climate change impacts on phenology and yields of five broadacre crops at four climatologically distinct locations in Australia. Agricultural Systems, 132, 133–144.
7.
ArntzM., GregoryT., & ZierahnU. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment, and Migration Working Papers (189), 0_1.
8.
Australian Government (2015a). Australia’s 2030 climate change target. https://publications.industry.gov.au/publications/climate-change/system/files/resources/c42/factsheet-australias-2030-climate-change-target.pdf
9.
Australian Government (2015b). The Renewable Energy Target (RET) scheme. https://publications.industry.gov.au/publications/climate-change/climate-change/government/renewable-energy-target-scheme.html
10.
Australian Treasury (2011). Strong growth, low pollution: Modelling a carbon price. Australian Government, Canberra.
11.
BhaduriA., & MarglinS. (1990). Unemployment and the real wage: The economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), 375–393.
12.
BosquetB. (2000). Environmental tax reform: Does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 19–32.
13.
BovenbergA. L., & van der PloegF. (1996). Optimal taxation, public goods and environmental policy with involuntary unemployment. Journal of Public Economics, 62(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(96)01574-5
14.
CashinP., MohaddesK., & RaissiM. (2017). China’s slowdown and global financial market volatility: Is world growth losing out?Emerging Markets Review, 31, 164–175.
15.
ChambersL. E., HughesL., & WestonM. A. (2005). Climate change and its impact on Australia’s avifauna. Emu-Austral Ornithology, 105(1), 1–20.
16.
CremerH., GahvariF., & LadouxN. (1998). Externalities and optimal taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 343–364.
17.
De MooijR. A., & BovenbergA. L. (1998). Environmental taxes, international capital mobility and inefficient tax systems: Tax burden vs. tax shifting. International Tax and Public Finance, 5(1), 7–39.
18.
Department of the Environment and Energy, Australia (2019). Quarterly update of Australia’s national greenhouse gas inventory: March 2019. Retrieved from Australia: http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/6686d48f-3f9c-448d-a1b7-7e410fe4f376/files/nggi-quarterly-update-mar-2019.pdf
19.
DoubledayZ. A., ClarkeS. M., LiX., PeclG. T., WardT. M., BattagleneS., FrusherS., GibbsP. J., HobdayA. J., HutchinsonN., & JenningsS. M. (2013). Assessing the risk of climate change to aquaculture: A case study from south-east Australia. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 3(2), 163–175.
20.
EIA (2017a). International energy statistics. https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/rankings/#?prodact=44-2&iso=AUS&pid=44&aid=2&tl_id=2-A&tl_type=a&cy=2017
21.
EIA (2017b). Country analysis brief: Australia. https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis_includes/countries_long/Australia/australia.pdf
22.
FinnR. B. (1983). United States–Japan Relations: Toward a New Equilibrium. Transaction Publishers.
23.
HardistyP. E., ClarkT. S., & HynesR. G. (2012). Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation: A comparative analysis of Australian energy sources. Energies, 5(4), 872–897.
24.
HarleK., HowdenS., HuntL. P., & DunlopM. (2007). The potential impact of climate change on the Australian wool industry by 2030. Agricultural Systems, 93(1–3), 61–89.
25.
HiggsP. J., ParmenterB. R., & RimmerR. J. (1988). A hybrid top-down, bottom-up regional computable general equilibrium model. International Regional Science Review, 11(3), 317–328.
26.
HorridgeM. (2003). ORANI-G: A generic single-country computable general equilibrium model. CoPS and the Impact Project, Monash University, Australia.
27.
HorridgeM., ParmenterB. R., & PearsonK. R. (2000). ORANI-G: A general equilibrium model of the Australian economy. CoPS.
28.
HowdenM., & JonesR. N. (2004). Risk assessment of climate change impacts on Australia’s wheat industry [Paper presentation]. Proceedings for the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia.
29.
HowdenS., CrimpS., & StokesC. (2008). Climate change and Australian livestock systems: Impacts, research and policy issues. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48(7), 780–788.
30.
KilimaniN., HeerdenJ. V., & BohlmannH. (2015). Water taxation and the double dividend hypothesis. Water Resources and Economics, 10, 68–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2015.03.001
31.
LehrU., LutzC., & EdlerD. (2012). Green jobs? Economic impacts of renewable energy in Germany. Energy Policy, 47(Supplement C), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.076
32.
LehrU., NitschJ., KratzatM., LutzC., & EdlerD. (2008). Renewable energy and employment in Germany. Energy Policy, 36(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.004
33.
Lowy Institute (2019). 2019 Lowy Institute Poll – Australian attitudes to climate change. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/media-release–2019-lowy-institute-poll-australian-attitudes-climate-change
34.
LucasC., HennessyK., MillsG., & BatholsJ. (2007). Bushfire weather in southeast Australia: Recent trends and projected climate change impacts.
35.
MankiwN. G., WeinzierlM., & YaganD. (2009). Optimal taxation in theory and practice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(4), 147–174.
36.
MaximM. R. (2020). Environmental fiscal reform and the possibility of triple dividend in European and non-European countries: Evidence from a meta-regression analysis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 1–24.
37.
MaximM. R., & ZanderK. (2019). Can a green tax reform entail employment double dividend in European and non-European countries? A survey of the empirical evidence. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(3), 218–228.
38.
MaximM. R., ZanderK. K., & PatuelliR. (2019). Green tax reform and employment double dividend in European and Non-European countries: A meta-regression assessment. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(4), 342–355.
39.
McConnellK. E., & StrandI. (1981). Measuring the cost of time in recreation demand analysis: An application to sportfishing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(1), 153–156.
40.
McDougallR. (1993a). Short-run effects of a carbon tax. CoPS.
41.
McDougallR. A. (1993b). Energy taxes and greenhouse gas emissions in Australia. CoPS and the Impact Project, Monash University, Australia. https://www.copsmodels.com/ftp/workpapr/g-104.pdf
42.
MengS., SiriwardanaM., & McNeillJ. (2013). The environmental and economic impact of the carbon tax in Australia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 54(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9600-4
43.
MengS., SiriwardanaM., & McNeillJ. (2014). The impact of the Australian carbon tax on industries and households. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 8(1), 15–37.
44.
MengX. (2012). Will Australian carbon tax affect the resources boom? Results from a CGE Model. Natural Resources Research, 21(4), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-012-9187-z
45.
MunteanM., GuizzardiD., SchaafE., CrippaM., SolazzoE., OlivierJ., & VignatiE. (2018). Fossil CO2 emissions of all world countries–2018 Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
46.
NichollsN. (2004). The changing nature of Australian droughts. Climatic Change, 63(3), 323–336.
47.
PatuelliR., NijkampP., & PelsE. (2005). Environmental tax reform and the double dividend: A meta-analytical performance assessment. Ecological Economics, 55(4), 564–583.
48.
PearceD. (1991). The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. Economic Journal, 101(407), 938–948.
49.
PisauroG. (1991). The effect of taxes on labour in efficiency wage models. Journal of Public Economics, 46(3), 329–345.
50.
PuiK. L., & OthmanJ. (2017). Economics and environmental implications of fuel efficiency improvement in Malaysia: A computable general equilibrium approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.067
51.
SajeewaniD., SiriwardanaM., & McneillJ. (2015). Household distributional and revenue recycling effects of the carbon price in Australia. Climate Change Economics, 6(03), 1550012.
52.
TaylorR., & HoyleR. (2014). Australia becomes first developed nation to repeal carbon tax. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/australia-repeals-carbon-tax-1405560964
53.
The World Bank (2015). Energy use per capita-country rankings. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/energy_use_per_capita/
54.
The World Bank (2019). CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?end=2014&locations=AU&start=1960&view=chart
55.
TullockG. (1967). Excess benefit. Water Resources Research, 3(2), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR003i002p00643
56.
Van HeerdenJ., GerlaghR., BlignautJ., HorridgeM., HessS., MabuguR., & MabuguM. (2006). Searching for triple dividends in South Africa: Fighting CO2 pollution and poverty while promoting growth. The Energy Journal, 113–141.
57.
WebbL., WhettonP., & BarlowE. (2008). Climate change and winegrape quality in Australia. Climate Research, 36(2), 99–111.
58.
WhettonP., FowlerA., HaylockM., & PittockA. (1993). Implications of climate change due to the enhanced greenhouse effect on floods and droughts in Australia. Climatic Change, 25(3–4), 289–317.
59.
YusufA. A. (2008). The distributional impact of environmental policy: The case of carbon tax and energy pricing reform in Indonesia. Singapore: Environment and Economy Program for Southeast Asia, Research Report (2008-RR1).
