Trade agreements are increasingly being negotiated between developed and emerging economy partners. An example is the EU–India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) for which negotiations began in 2007. There has been a debate on the potential effects of the proposed FTA and how this can impact on India’s key export sectors. Our study addresses this aspect from a global computable general equilibrium (CGE) modelling perspective. Using the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) framework, we analyse trade and welfare impacts of the proposed FTA between the EU and India. Two scenarios are modelled: first, complete and immediate elimination of tariff on all goods traded and second, selective tariff elimination on textiles, wearing apparel and leather goods—products in which India has a comparative advantage. Results under both scenarios show that India enjoys positive welfare effects though there is a possibility of trade diversion. Under scenario 1, India loses due to a negative terms of trade (ToT) effect. Under scenario 2, with selective sectoral liberalisation, gains are mainly concentrated in the textiles, wearing apparel and leather sectors. There is a positive output effect from change in demand for factors of production, suggesting that the proposed FTA could lead to relocation of labour-intensive production to India.
AchterboschT., KuiperM., & RozaP. (2008). EU-India free trade agreement: A quantitative assessment. Report no. 2008–059, Project code 20824. The Hague: LEI Wageningen.
2.
Agence Europe. (2007). Council’s green light to launch negotiations for bilateral free trade agreements with ASEAN, South Korea and India. Retrieved 15November2016, from www.ciaonet.org/pbei/oxfam/0003418/f_0003418_2529.pdf
3.
AggarwalV., & LeeS. (Eds). (2011). Trade policy in the Asia Pacific: The role of ideas, interests and domestic institutions. New York: Springer.
4.
AggarwalV.K., & ShujiroU., 2006. Bilateral trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. London: Routledge.
5.
AggarwalV.K., & UrataS. (2006). Bilateral trade agreements in the Asia Pacific: Origins, evolution and implications, Abingdon: Routledge.
6.
AndersonJ., & YotovY.V. (2011). “Terms of Trade and Global Efficiency Effects of Free Trade Agreements, 1990-2002.” NBER Working Papers 17003. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
BaierS., & BergstrandJ. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95.
8.
BaldwinR. (1993) ‘A Domino Theory of Regionalism’. Working Paper 857. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
9.
BaldwinR. (1995). A domino theory of regionalism. In BaldwinR., HaarparantaP. & KiandenJ. (Eds), Expanding membership of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BaldwinR. (2002). The causes of regionalism. The World Economy, 20(7), 865–88.
11.
BaldwinR. (2006). Multilateralising regionalism: Spaghetti bowls as building blocks on the path to global free trade. The World Economy, 29(2), 1451–518.
12.
BaldwinR. (2008). Managing the noodle bowl: The fragility of East Asian regionalism. Singapore Economic Review, 53(3), 449–79.
13.
BaldwinR. (2011). Trade and industrialisation after globalisation’s 2nd unbundling: How building and joining a supply chain are different and why it matters. NBER working paper 17766. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
BaldwinR. (2013). Lessons from the European spaghetti bowl. ADBI working paper 418. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
15.
BaldwinR., & JaimovichD. (2012). Are free trade agreements contagious?Journal of International Economics, 88(1), 1–16.
16.
BaldwinR., & VenablesA. (1995). Regional economic integration. In GrossmanG. & RogoffK. (Eds), Handbook of international economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
17.
BhagwatiJ. (1998). Trading preferentially: Theory and policy. Economic Journal, 108(449), 1128–48.
18.
BhagwatiJ., & PanagariyaA. (1996). The economics of preferential trade agreements. Cambridge, MA: The AEI Press.
19.
BrownD.K., DeardorffA.V., & SternR.M. (1994). A North American free trade agreement: Analytical issues and a computational assessment. The World Economy, 15(1), 11–30.
20.
Business Standard. (2012). FTA with EU to benefit textile exports. Retrieved 4June2015, from http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/ftaeu-soon-to-benefit-textile-exports/480043/
21.
CernatL. (2003). Assessing regional trade agreements: Are South-South RTAs more trade diverting?Geneva: UNCTAD, mimeo.
22.
CoeD., & HoffmaisterA. (1999). North-South trade: Is Africa unusual?Journal of African Economies, 8(2), 228–56.
23.
DaiM., YotovY.V., & ZylkinT. (2014). On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements. Economics Letters, 122(2), 321–325
24.
DasR.U., PiyadasaE., & SwarupA. (2012). Regional trade and economic integration: Analytical insights and policy options (pp. 1–234). Singapore and NJ: World Scientific.
25.
DecreuxY., & MitaritonnaC. (2007). Economic impact of a potential free trade agreement between the European Union and India. Report by CEPII/CEMIN to the DG trade of the European Commission, trade specific contract no: SI2.434.087. Retrieved 4June2015, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/134682.htm
26.
DentC. (2003). Networking the region? The emergence and impact of Asia-Pacific bilateral free trade agreement projects. Pacific Review, 16(1), 1–28.
27.
ECORYS. (2009). Trade sustainability impact assessment for the FTA between the EU and the Republic of India. Report for DG trade in the European Commission, reference no. TRADE07/C1/C01 - Lot 1. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
28.
EthierW. (1998). The new regionalism. The Economic Journal, 108(449), 1149–61.
29.
European Commission. (2010). Growth, jobs and trade, COM 216. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
30.
European Commission. (2015). Report from the commission to the European council trade and investment barriers report, COM 127 final. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/march/tradoc_153259.pdf
31.
Eurostat. (2012). News release. Brussels.
32.
FrankelJ. (1997). Regional trading blocks in the world economic system. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
33.
FrankelJ., SteinE., & WeiS. (1995). Trading blocs and the Americas: The natural, the unnatural and the supernatural. Journal of Development Economics, 47(1), 61–96.
34.
FrankelJ., & WeiS.J. (1997). Regionalization of world trade and currencies: Economic and politics’, regionalisation of the world economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
FreundC. L., & OrnelasE. (2010). Regional trade agreements. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5314. Washington, DC: World Bank.
36.
GarcíaM. (2012). Competitive fears: The EU, USA and the free trade agreements in East Asia. European Union, Foreign Affairs Review, 2(1), 59–71.
37.
GasiorekM., HolmesP., RobinsonS., RolloJ., & ShingalA. (2007). Qualitative analysis of a potential free trade agreement between the European Union and India. Executive Summary Report to DG Trade of the European Commission, Sussex, University of Sussex, Centre for the Analysis of Regional Integration at Sussex and CUTS International, Jaipur. Retrieved 4June2015, from http://www.cuts_citee.org/EUIndia_RTA.htm
38.
GoulderL. (2002). Environmental policy making in economies with prior tax distortions. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
39.
Government of India. (2007). ‘Exploring New Regionalism: The EU, India and Beyond’. Proceedings from the conference organised by CENTAD, 30 October–1 November.
40.
GrossmanG., & HelpmanE. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
HelpmanE., MelitzM., & RubinsteinY. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441–487.
43.
HertelT. (Ed.). (1997). Global trade analysis: Modelling and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
HertelT., HummelsD., IvanicM., & KeeneyR. (2004). How confident can we be in CGE-based assessments of free trade agreements?GTAP working paper no. 26. Indianapolis, US: Centre for Global Trade Analysis.
45.
KehoeP.J., & KehoeT.J. (1994). Capturing NAFTA’s impact with applied general equilibrium models. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Quarterly Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 18(2), 17.
46.
KellerW. (1998). Are international R&D spillovers trade-related? Analysing spillovers among randomly matched trade partners. European Economic Review, 42(8), 1469–81.
47.
KhoranaS., & AsthanaA. (2014). EU’s FTA negotiations with India: The question of liberalisation of public procurement. Asia Europe Journal, 12(3), 251–63. doi:10.1007/s10308-014-0369-7
48.
KhoranaS., & GarciaM. (2013). EU-India free trade agreement: One step forward, one back?Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(3), 274–300.
49.
KhoranaS., & GarciaM. (2014). Procurement liberalization diffusion in EU agreements: Signalling stewardship?Journal of World Trade, 48(3), 481–500.
50.
KhoranaS., KerrW.A., & PerdikisN. (2014). Global economies of scale in the EU-India trade agreement: Are they the key to a return to economic growth?Asia Europe Journal, 13, 41–55. doi:10.1007/s10308-014-0404-8
51.
KhoranaS., & PerdikisN. (2010). EU-India free trade agreement: Deal or no deal?South Asia Economic Journal, 11(2), 182–206.
52.
KhoranaS., PerdikisN., & DasD.K.2008, Convergence between the EU and India: Foreign and Commonwealth Office. New Delhi: British High Commission.
53.
KhoranaS., & SooK. T. (2013). Exporter’s perceptions to obstacles faced in the EU: Evidence from Indian textiles and leather goods firms. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 7(2), 261–277.
54.
KrugmanP. (1993). Regionalism versus multilateralism: Analytical notes. In de MeloJ. & PanagariyaA. (Eds), New dimensions in regional integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
LeeJ.W., & ShinK. (2006). Does regionalism lead to more global trade integration in East Asia?The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(3), 283–301.
56.
LipseyR.G. (1957). The theory of customs unions, trade diversion and welfare. Economica, 24, 40–46.
57.
MageeC.S. (2003). Endogenous preferential trade agreements: An empirical analysis. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2(1).
58.
MageeC.S. (2008). New measures of trade creation and trade diversion. Journal of International Economics, 75(3), 340–62.
59.
MageeC.S. (2016). Trade creation, trade diversion, and the general equilibrium effects of regional trade agreements: a study of the European Community–Turkey customs union. Review of World Economics, 152(2), 383–399
60.
MansfieldE., & MilnerH. (2012). Votes, vetoes and the political economy of preferential trade agreements. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
61.
MeadeJ. (1955). The theory of customs union. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
62.
NarayananG. Badri, & WalmsleyTerrie L. (Eds). (2008). Global trade assistance and production: The GTAP 7 database. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.
63.
NgT.H., & YarciaD.L. (July2014). Has regional integration led to greater risk-sharing in Asia?ADB working paper series on regional economic integration, no. 135. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
64.
PanagariyaA. (1996). The free trade area of the Americas: Good for Latin America?The World Economy, 19(5), 485–515.
65.
PanagariyaA. (2000). Preferential trade liberalization: Traditional theory and new developments. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 287–331.
66.
PerryG., WhalleyJ., & McMahonG. (2001). Fiscal reform and structural change in developing countries. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
67.
PolaskiS.A., KumarG., McDonaldS., & RobinsonS. (2008). India’s trade policy choices. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved 4September2014, from http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/india%27s_trade_policy_choices_final.pdf
68.
PomfretR. (1988). Unequal trade: The economics of discriminatory international trade policies. Oxford: Blackwell.
69.
PowellS. (2008). The EU-FTA: Initial observations from a development perspective (pp. 1–21). London: Traidcraft Exchange. Retrieved 4September2014, from http://www.indianet.nl/pdf/EU-IndiaFTAInitialObservations.pdf
70.
RavenhillJ. (2003). The new bilateralism in the Asia Pacific. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 299–317.
71.
ReimerJ., & HertelT. (2004). International–cross section estimates of demand for use in the GTAP model. GTAP technical paper no. 23. US: Centre for Global Trade Analysis.
72.
RobinsonS., & ThierfelderK. (2002). Trade liberalisation and regional integration: The search for large numbers. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46(4), 585–604.
73.
SolisM., KatadaS., & StallingsB. (Eds). (2009). Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the Pacific Rim. Palgrave Macmillan.
74.
SrinivasanT.N. (1998). Trade and human rights. In DeardoffA. & SteinR. (Eds), Constituent interests and US trade policies, 225–53. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
75.
SummersL. (1991). Regionalism and world trading system. In “Policy implications of trade and currency”. Proceedings of symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Wyoming, USA.
76.
The Times of India. (2012, September). EU-India trade drops. Retrieved 4June2015, from http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-09-19/india-business/33951515_1_eu-india-trade-eu-exports-cent
77.
VicardV. (2009). On trade creation and regional trade agreements: Does depth matter?Review of World Economy, 145(2), 167–87.
78.
VinerJ. (1950). The customs union issue. In BhagwatiJ.. (Eds), Trading blocks alternative approaches to analysing preferential trade agreements. Cambridge: MIT Press.
79.
WeiS., & FrankelJ. (2005). “Slow Passthrough Around the World: A New Import for Developing Countries?”NBER Working Paper No. 11199. Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research.
80.
WannacottRonald J. (1990). U.S. hub-and-spoke bilaterals and the multilateral trading system. Commentary (whole issue, October). Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.
81.
WonnacottP., & LutzM. (1989). Is there a case for free trade areas? In SchottJ.J. (Ed.), Free trade areas and U.S. trade policy (pp. 59–84). Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
82.
World Bank. (2000). World development indicators. World Bank, Washington, DC.
