Using choice experiments, we estimate the willingness to pay for price insurance among cotton and paddy farmers in the Indian state of Gujarat. We also identify the interactions between the demand for price insurance and existing informal and formal risk management mechanisms. Our results indicate that cotton farmers value price insurance more than paddy farmers. Also, most of the existing informal risk management strategies seem to have a positive effect on the demand for price insurance, suggesting potential complementarities. Important policy implications on the design and bundling of innovative financial products follow from our findings.
AlbarranP., & AttanasioO. (2005). Do public transfers crowd out private transfers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico. In DerconS. (Ed.), Insurance against poverty (pp. 281–304). New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AldermanH., & PaxsonC. (1992). Do the poor insure? A synthesis of the literature on risk and consumption in developing countries. Working Paper No. WPS 1008. World Bank, Washington, DC.
3.
AlpizarF., CarlssonF., & MartinssonP. (2003). Using choice experiments for non-market valuation. Economic Issues—Stoke on Trent, 8(1), 83–110.
4.
BarnettB., BarrettC., & SkeesJ. (2008). Poverty traps and index-based risk transfer products. World Development, 36(10), 1766–85.
5.
BarrettC. (1996). On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship. Journal of Development Economics, 51(2), 193–215.
6.
BasuK. (2010). The economics of foodgrain management in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
7.
BellemareM., BarrettC., & JustD. (2013). The welfare impacts of commodity price volatility: Evidence from rural Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(4), 877–99.
8.
BergE., & SchmitzB. (2008). Weather-based instruments in the context of whole-farm risk management. Agricultural Finance Review, 68(1), 119–33.
9.
BienabeE., & HearneR. (2006). Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(4), 335–48.
10.
BirolE., & DasS. (2010). Estimating the value of improved wastewater treatment: The case of River Ganga, India. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(11), 2163–71.
11.
BirolE., VillalbaE., & SmaleM. (2009). Farmer preferences for milpa diversity and genetically modified maize in Mexico: A latent class approach. Environment and Development Economics, 14(4), 521–40.
12.
BoxallP., & AdamowiczW. (2002). Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4), 421–46.
13.
DehnJ. (2000). The effects on growth of commodity price uncertainty and shocks. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2455. World Bank, Washington, DC.
14.
DerconS. (1996). Risk, crop choice, and savings: Evidence from Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 44(3), 485–513.
15.
FinkelshtainI., & ChalfantJ. (1991). Marketed surplus under risk: Do peasants agree with Sandmo?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(3), 557–67.
16.
GautamM., HazellP., & AldermanH. (1994). Management of drought risks in rural areas. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1383. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
17.
Government of India. (2006). Risk management in agriculture. Report submitted by a Working Group for XI Five-Year Plan (2007–2012). Government of India, New Delhi.
18.
Government of India. (2008). The impact of futures trading on agricultural commodity prices. Report submitted by an Expert Committee to Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution. Government of India, New Delhi.
19.
HardakerJ.B., HuirneR.B.M., AndersonJ.R., & LienG. (2004). Coping with risk in agriculture. Oxford: CABI Publishing.
20.
HazellP., PomaredaC., & ValdesA. (1986). Crop insurance for agricultural development: Issues and experience. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
HensherD., & RoseJ. (2012). The influence of alternative acceptability, attribute thresholds and choice response certainty on automobile purchase preferences. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 46(3), 451–68.
22.
HessS., HensherD., & DalyA. (2012). Not bored yet—revisiting respondent fatigue in stated choice experiments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(3), 626–44.
23.
HillR. (2006). Coffee price risk in the market: Exporter, trader and producer. Working Paper No. GPRG-WPS-048. Global Poverty Research Group, Economic and Social Science Research Group, UK.
24.
HillR. (2009). Using stated preferences and beliefs to identify the impact of risk on poor households. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(2), 151–71.
25.
HillR. (2010). Liberalisation and producer price risk: Examining subjective expectations in the Ugandan coffee market. Journal of African Economies, 19(4), 433–58.
26.
HopeR.A. (2006). Evaluating water policy scenarios against the priorities of the rural poor. World Development, 34(1), 167–79.
27.
KouameE., & KomenanA. (2012). Risk preferences and demand for insurance under price uncertainty: An experimental approach for cocoa farmers in Cote D’Ivoire. Research Paper No. 13. Micro Insurance Innovation Facility, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
28.
KurosakiT. (1998). Risk and household behavior in Pakistan’s agriculture. Occasional Paper Series. Institute of Developing Economies, Japan.
29.
LancasterK. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–57.
30.
LancasterK. (1971). Consumer demand: A new approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
LapanH., & MoschiniG. (1994). Futures hedging under price, basis and production risk. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(3), 465–77.
32.
LuceD. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley Publications.
33.
MahulO., & WrightB. (2003). Designing optimal crop revenue insurance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(3), 580–89.
34.
McFaddenD. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In ZarembkaP. (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105–42). New York: Academic Press.
35.
McKinnonR.I. (1967). Futures markets, buffer stocks, and income stability for primary producers. Journal of Political Economy, 75(6), 844–61.
36.
MishraP. (1995). Is rainfall insurance a new idea? Pioneering work revisited. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(25), A84–A88.
37.
MorduchJ. (1999). The microfinance promise. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1569–614.
38.
RigbyD., AlconF., & BurtonM. (2010). Supply uncertainty and the economic value of irrigation water. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 37(1), 97–117.
39.
RolfoJ. (1980). Optimal hedging under price and quantity uncertainty: The case of a cocoa producer. Journal of Political Economy, 88(1), 100–16.
40.
SahuG., MadheswaranS., & RajasekharD. (2004). Credit constraints and distress sales in rural India: Evidence from Kalahandi district, Orissa. Journal of Peasant Studies, 31(2), 210–41.
41.
SakuraiT., & ReardonT. (1997). Potential demand for drought insurance in Burkina Faso and its determinants. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(4), 1193–207.
42.
SandmoA. (1971). On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty. The American Economic Review, 61(1), 65–73.
43.
SarrisA. (2002). The demand for commodity insurance by developing country agricultural producers: Theory and an application to cocoa in Ghana. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2887. World Bank, Washington, DC.
44.
SarrisA., KarfakisP., & ChristiaensenL. (2006). Producer demand and welfare benefits of minimum price insurance for export crops in Tanzania. Unpublished manuscript, Mimeo.
45.
SimmonsP. (2002). Why do farmers have so little interest in futures markets?Agricultural Economics, 27(1), 1–6.
46.
SkeesJ. (2002). Can financial markets be tapped to help poor people cope with weather risks?Discussion Paper No. 2002/23. World Institute of Development Economics Research, Finland.
47.
TownsendR. (1994). Risk and insurance in village India. Econometrica, 62(3), 539–91.
48.
TownsendR. (1995). Consumption insurance: An evaluation of risk-bearing systems in low-income economies. The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(3), 83–102.
49.
TrainK. (1998). Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics, 74(2), 230–39.
50.
WalkerT., & RyanJ. (1990). Village and household economics in India’s semi-arid tropics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
