The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the vindication of the savings-led growth hypothesis for the Malaysian economy with the long-run TYDL version of the Granger causality test—Toda and Yamamoto (1995) and Dolado and Lütkepohl (1996). This study used the quarterly sample from 1970:Q1 to 2008:Q4. The recursive regression procedure will also incorporate into the TYDL causality test to measure the stability of the savings-led growth hypothesis in the long-run. Our empirical results support that the savings-led growth hypothesis is a long-run phenomenon and stable over time. Therefore, the Malaysian dataset supports the endogenous growth theory.
AghionPhilippeCominDiegoHowittPeterTecuIsabel (2009). When does domestic saving matter for economic growth?Harvard Business School Working Paper 09-080, Havard University.
2.
AgrawalP. (2001). The relation between saving and growth: Cointegration and causality evidence from Asia. Applied Economics, 33(4), 499–513.
3.
AngJ. B. (2009). Financial development and economic growth in Malaysia. London: Routledge.
4.
BaharumshahA. Z.ThanoonM. A. (2003). Determinants of gross national saving in Malaysia: A macroeconomic analysis 1960–2000. Savings and Development, 27(4), 421–40.
5.
BaharumshahA. Z.ThanoonM. A.RashidS. (2003). Saving dynamics in the Asian countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 13(6), 827–45.
6.
BierensH. J. (1997). Nonparametric cointegration analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 7(2), 379–404.
7.
BooM. C.NormeeC. S. (2004). Effect of foreign capital inflow and domestic savings on Malaysia’s economic growth: Time series evidence. In The 16th Malaysian Economic Association Convention, 9December2004, Malaysia.
8.
DavidsonR.MacKinnonJ. G. (2004). Econometric theory and methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
DoladoJ. J.LütkepohlH. (1996). Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR system. Econometric Reviews, 15(4), 369–86.
10.
DomarE. D. (1946). Capital expansion, rate of growth, and employment. Econometrica, 14(2), 137–47.
11.
GandolfoG. (1981). Quantitative analysis and econometric estimation of continuous time dynamic. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.
12.
GewekeJ.MeeseR.DentW. (1983). Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems. Journal of Econometrics, 21(2), 161–94.
13.
GrangerC. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 428–38.
14.
GrangerC. W. J. (1988). Some recent development in the concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39(1–2), 199–211.
15.
GrangerC. W. J.NewboldP. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–20.
16.
HackerR. S.Hatemi-JA. (2006). Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: Theory and application. Applied Economics, 38(13), 1489–500.
17.
HarrodR. F. (1939). An essay in dynamic theory. Economic Journal, 49(193), 14–33.
18.
HolmesJ. M.HuttonP. A. (1990). On the causal relationship between government expenditure and national income. Reviews of Economics Statistics, 72(1), 87–95.
19.
HsiaoC. (1981). Autoregressive modeling and money-income causality detection. Journal of Monetary Economics, 7(1), 85–106.
20.
JohansenS.JuseliusK. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
21.
LeeJ.StrazicichM. C. (2001). Break point estimation and spurious rejections with endogenous unit root tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63(5), 535–58.
22.
LeeJ.StrazicichM. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082–89.
23.
LeeJ.StrazicichM. C. (2004). Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC.
24.
LumsdaineR. L.PapellD. H. (1997). Multiple trend breaks and the unit-root hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212–18.
25.
LütkepohlH. (2005). New Introduction to multiple time series analysis. Germany: Springer-Verlag.
26.
MantalosP. (2000). A graphical investigation of the size and power of the Granger causality tests in integrated-cointegrated VAR systems. Studies in Non-linear Dynamics and Econometrics, 4(1), 17–33.
27.
NelsonC. R.PlosserC. I. (1982). Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: Some evidence and implications. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(2), 139–62.
28.
PerronP. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361–401.
29.
PesaranM. H.ShinY.SmithR. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of the level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
30.
PhillipsP. C. B. (1986). Understanding spurious regression in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 33(3), 311–40.
31.
RomerP. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–37.
32.
SenA. (2003). On unit-root tests when the alternative is a trend-break stationary process. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21(1), 174–84.
33.
SolowR. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
34.
TangC. F. (2008a). An empirical modelling on savings behaviour in Malaysia. Labuan Bulletin of International Business and Finance, 6, 57–76.
35.
TangC. F. (2008b). Wagner’s law versus Keynesian hypothesis: New evidence from recursive regression-based causality approaches. ICFAI Journal of Public Finance, 6(4), 29–38.
36.
TangC. F. (2009). Does causality technique matter to savings-growth nexus in Malaysia?Malaysian Management Journal, 13(1 & 2), 1–10.
37.
TangC. F.ChuaS. Y. (2009). The savings-growth nexus in Malaysia: Evidence from nonparametric analysis. ICFAI Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3 & 4), 1–12.
38.
TodaH. Y.YamamotoT. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated process. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–50.
39.
World Bank (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
YamadaH.TodaH. Y. (1998). Inference in possibly integrated vector autoregressive models: Some finite sample evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 86(1), 55–95.
41.
ZapataH. O.RambaldiA. N. (1997). Monte Carlo evidence on cointegration and causation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59(2), 285–98.
42.
ZhouS. (2001). The power of cointegration tests versus data frequency and time spans. Southern Economic Journal, 67(4), 906–21.
43.
ZivotE.AndrewsD. W. K. (1992). Further evidence of the greater crash, the oil price shock and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–70.
