Trade,Employment and the Informal Sector: An Agent-based Analysis

Abstract

This article discusses a multi-agent model of the informal sector. An analytical model is first developed to explore the possible range of relationships between formal and informal employment. Data from the agent-based model support protecting formal sector jobs with current account restrictions. It is seen that restrictions on outsourcing can have a positive effect on formal sector activity. Offshoring, that is, relocating to another country, is also considered. When restrictions on offshoring are studied, it is seen that formal sector employment growth is less robust. Unrestricted current and capital account activity produces a steady state with near zero informal activity, while restrictions preserve the informal sector indefinitely.

JEL Classifications: O17, E17, D58

Keywords

Informal Sector Employment Agent-based Models

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beaudry

Collard

(2002). Why has the employment–productivity tradeoff among industrialized countries been so strong? Technical Report W8754, NBER, Washington, DC.

Brock

W. A.

Durlauf

(2005). Social interactions and macroeconomics. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/econ/archive/wp2005-05.pdf

Epstein

(2006). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Epstein

Axtell

(1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Farmer

J.D.

Foley

(2009). The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature, 460, 685–86.

Gibson

(2007). A multi-agent systems approach to microeconomic foundations of macro. Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts.

Gibson

(2008). Keynesian and neoclassical closures in an agent-based context. METU Studies in Development, 35(1), 81–100.

Gibson

Kelley

(1994). A classical theory of the informal sector. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 62(1), 81–96.

Jansen

Lee

(2007). Trade and employment: Challenges for policy research. Geneva: International Labour Office.

10.

Lewis

W.A.

(1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 22(2), 139–91.

11.

McMillan

Rodrik

(2011). Globalization, structural change, and productivity growth. In Bacchetta

Jansen

(Eds.), Making globalization socially sustainable, Chapter 2. Geneva: International Labour Organization and World Trade Organization. Paper prepared for a joint ILO-WTO volume.

12.

Railsback

S.F.

Lytinen

S.L.

Jackson

S.K.

(2007). Agent-based simulation platforms: Review and development recommendations. Simulation, 82(9), 609–23.

13.

Sinha

(2011). Trade and the informal sector. In Jansen

Peters

Salazar-Xirinachs

J.M.

(Eds), Trade and employment: From myths to facts. Geneva: International Labour Office, ILO.

14.

Wilensky

(1998). Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo

15.

World Bank (2009). World development report. Washington, DC: Oxford.