This article considers two aspects in the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) first set of reports on financial stability. First, the reports fear sudden and large flows of foreign capital, and rightly so. However, the focus of policy makers has been on foreign exchange reserves and on capital controls to some extent. This article explores the use of an additional instrument—the international credit line. Second, this article reconsiders the reasons for the correlation between stock prices and capital flows. There is some misunderstanding in the interpretation of the evidence. Finally, it is suggested that the government should gradually move in the direction of ‘prescription financial products’ to contain excessive volatility in financial markets.
AcharyaV.V.AlmeidaH.CampelloM. (2010). Aggregate risk and the choice between cash and lines of credit, NBER Working Paper 16122, June.
2.
Bank for International Settlements (2009). Capital flows and emerging market economies, Committee on the Global Financial System, CGFS Papers No 33. Report submitted by a Working Group established by the Committee on the Global Financial System (chaired by Rakesh Mohan of the Reserve Bank of India), January. Retrieved from www.bis.org.
3.
BasuK. (2009). The mechanics of central bank intervention in foreign exchange markets, CAE Working Paper #09-02, 27January.
BhagwatiJ. (1998). The capital myth—The difference between trade in widgets and dollars. Foreign Affairs, 77(3), May/June, 7–12.
6.
ChangR.VelascoA. (2001). A model of financial crises in emerging markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), May, 489–517.
7.
DiamondD.W.RajanR.G. (2001). Banks, short-term debt, financial crises: Theory, policy implications and applications. Carnegie-Rochester Conference series on Public Policy, 54(1), 37–51.
8.
EichengreenB.GuptaP.ModyA. (2006). Sudden stops and IMF-supported Programs, NBER Working Paper 12235.
9.
FischerS. (2002). Strengthening crisis prevention: The role of contingent credit lines. In Banco de Mexico Stabilization and Monetary Policy: The international experience, May, 61–76.
10.
ForbesK. (2006). The microeconomic evidence on capital controls: No free lunch. In EdwardsS. (ed.), Capital controls and capital flows in emerging economies: Policies, practices and consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Government of India (GoI) (2009). India’s financial sector—An assessment, volume III, Advisory panel on financial stability assessment and stress testing, March. New Delhi: Foundation Books.
12.
Government of India (GoI). (2010). Report of the working group on foreign investment. 30July, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.
13.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (1999). IMF tightens defences against financial contagion by establishing contingent credit lines. MF Press Release No. 99/14, 25April.
14.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2003). Review of Contingent Credit Lines, Prepared by the Policy Development and Review Department in consultation with other departments, approved by Timothy Geithner, 11February.
15.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2010a). May, IMF Country Report No. 10/156, Colombia: Arrangement under the Flexible Credit Line and Cancellation of the Current Arrangement—Staff Report; Staff Supplement; Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the authorities of Colombia.
16.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2010b). July, IMF Country Report No. 10/207, Republic of Poland: Arrangement under the Flexible Credit Line—Staff Report; Staff Supplement; Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director the Republic of Poland.
17.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2010c). October5, The IMF’s Precautionary Credit Line (PCL), Factsheet.
18.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2011). January, IMF Country Report No. 11/11, Mexico: Arrangement under the Flexible Credit Line and Cancellation of the Current Arrangement—Staff Report; Staff Supplement; and Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion.
KohliR. (2005). Liberalizing capital flows: India’s experiences and policy issues, Oxford University Press.
21.
LewisK.K. (2000). Why do stocks and consumption imply such different gains from international risk sharing?Journal of International Economics, 52(1), 1–35.
LucasR. (1990). Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries?American Economic Review, 80(2), 92–96.
24.
ObstfeldM.ShamboughJ.C.TaylorA.M. (2009). Financial instability, reserves, and central bank swap lines in the panic of 2008. American Economic Review, 99(2), May, 480–86.
25.
OstryJ.D.GhoshA.R.HabermeierK.ChamonM.QureshiM.S.ReinhardtD.B.S. (2010). Capital inflows: The role of controls, IMF Staff Position Note 10/04 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).
26.
PatnaikI.ShahA. (2011). India’s financial globalisation, Working Paper 2011–79, January, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi.
27.
PhilbrookC. (1953). Realism in policy espousal. American Economic Review, 43(December), 846–59.
28.
PrasadE.S. (2009). Some new perspectives on India’s approach to capital account liberalization, NBER Working Paper 14658, January.
29.
PrasadE.RogoffK.WeiS.-J.KoseM. (2003). Effects of financial globalization on developing countries: Some empirical evidence. Occasional Paper No. 220. Washington, DC: IMF.
30.
RakshitM. (2003). External capital flows and foreign exchange reserves: Macroeconomic implications and policy issues. Money and Finance, 2(13–14), April–September.
31.
RajanRaghuram G. (2008). A hundred small steps: Report of the high-level committee on financial sector reforms to the prime minister of India, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
32.
Reserve Bank of India (1997). Report of the committee on capital account convertibility, Mumbai.
33.
Reserve Bank of India. (2006). Report of the committee on fuller capital account convertibility(chaired by S.S. Tarapore).
34.
Reserve Bank of India. (2007). Report on foreign exchange reserves, Mumbai.
35.
Reserve Bank of India. (2010). Financial stability report. March. Retrieved from http://www.rbi.org.in
36.
Reserve Bank of India. (2010). Financial stability report. December. Retrieved from http://www.rbi.org.in
37.
RodrikD. (1998). Who needs capital-account convertibility? In Stanley Fischer and others, Should the IMF pursue capital-account convertibility? Essays in international finance, No. 207, International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, May.
38.
RoubiniN.SetserB. (August2004). Bailouts or bail-ins responding to financial crises in emerging economies. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
39.
SenP.Monetary policy, capital flows, and the exchange rate. In GhateC. (ed.), Handbook of the Indian economy, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
40.
SenguptaA. (2009). The cost of holding excess reserves: Evidence from India. India Policy Forum, 5, 245–95.
41.
SercuP.VanpeeR. (2007). Home bias in international equity portfolios: A review. Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), AFI 0710, Faculty of Economics and Applied Economics, Katholieke Universitiet Leuven.
42.
ShillerR.J. (1984). Stock prices and social dynamics. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1984(2), 457–98.
43.
ShleiferA. (2000). Inefficient markets—An introduction to behavioral finance. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
SinghG. (2006). More on capital account convertibility. Economic and Political Weekly, August19, XLI(33), 3617–19.
45.
SinghG. (2009). Lacunae in financial regulatory framework vis-à-vis financial repression. Review of Market Integration, 1(2), 137–70.
46.
SinghG.Banking crises, liquidity, and credit line. London: Routledge. Forthcoming.
47.
StiglitzJ.E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.
48.
SufiA. (2009). Bank lines of credit in corporate finance: An empirical analysis. Review of Financial Studies, March, 22(3), 1057–88.
49.
TiroleJ. (2002). Financial crises, liquidity, and the international monetary system. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
