This paper considers the key policy issues related to liberalisation of trade in financial services that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) should be concerned with, and the role the IMF has played in advising on policies related to trade in financial services in its bilateral and multilateral surveillance and in conditionality attached to lending programmes. The IMF staff were generally aware of the literature and country experiences showing the benefits of financial liberalisation. But Fund advice in support of liberalisation can be best interpreted to be in support of country unilateral policy actions and the dynamics of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) accession process.
Aitken, B. (2005). The historical dominance of banks in China’s financial system. In People’s Republic of China—Selected issues, Chapter V, SM/05/273. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
2.
Baldwin, B., & Barnett, S. (2004). Systemic bank restructuring: Lessons from international experience. In People’s Republic of China—Selected issues, Chapter V, SM/04/228. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
3.
Callen, T. (1998). The financial performance of public sector commercial banks in India. In India—Selected issues, Chapter IV, SM/98/205. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
4.
Crosby, D.C. (2008). Banking on China’s WTO commitments: ’same bed, different dreams’ in China’s financial services sector. Journal of International Economic Law, 11(1), 75–105.
5.
Deardorff, A.V., & Stern, R.M. (2008). Empirical analysis of barriers to international services transactions and the consequences of liberalization. In A. Mattoo, R.M. Stern and G. Zanini (Eds), A handbook of international trade in services. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
De Nicolo, G., Geadah, S., & Rozhkov, D. (2003). Financial development in the CIS-7 countries: Bridging the great divide. IMF Working Paper 03/205. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
7.
Drummond, P., Maechler, A.M., & Marcelino, S. (2006). Italy: Assessing competition and efficiency in the banking system. In Italy—Selected issues, Chapter VI, SM/06/20. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
8.
Fischer, F. (2005). Banking sector development and reform. In Republic of Tajikistan—Selected issues and statistical appendix, Chapter VI, SM/05/80. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
9.
Gootiiz, B., & Mattoo, A. (2008). Services in Doha: What’s on the table?Policy Research Working Paper No. 4903. Washington DC: The World Bank.
10.
Government of India, Planning Commission (2009). A hundred small steps: Report of the committee on financial sector reforms. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
11.
Hoekman, B. (2008). The General Agreement on Trade in Services: Doomed to fail? Does it matter?Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 8(3), 295–318.
12.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1997a). Italy—Staff report for the 1997 article IV consultation, SM/97/58. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
13.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1997b). People’s Republic of China—Staff report for the 1997 article IV consultation, SM/97/137. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
14.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1997c). India—Staff report for the 1997 article IV consultation, SM/97/147. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
15.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1998a) Italy—Staff report for the 1998 article IV consultation, SM/98/50. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
16.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1998b). People’s Republic of China—Staff report for the 1998 article IV consultation, SM/98/170. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
17.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1998c). India—Staff report for the 1998 article IV consultation, SM/98/197. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
18.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1998d). Republic of Tajikistan—Request for arrangements under the enhanced structural adjustment facility, EBS/98/96. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
19.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1999a). Italy—Staff report for the 1999 article IV consultation, SM/99/110. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
20.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1999b). People’s Republic of China—Staff report for the 1999 article IV consultation, SM/99/156. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
21.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1999c). Republic of Tajikistan—Request for second annual arrangement under the enhanced structural adjustment facility, EBS/99/105. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
22.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2000a). International Capital Markets: Developments, Prospects, and Key Policy Issues. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
23.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2000b). India—Staff report for the 2000 article IV consultation, SM/00/90. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
24.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2000c). People’s Republic of China—Staff report for the 2000 article IV consultation, SM/00/150. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
25.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2000d). Republic of Tajikistan—Request for the third annual arrangement under the poverty reduction and growth facility and request for extension of commitment period, EBS/00/206. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
26.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2001a). India—Financial system stability assessment. Unpublished, Washington: International Monetary Fund.
27.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2001b). Republic of Tajikistan—Staff report for the 2001 article IV consultation, first review under the third annual arrangement under the poverty reduction and growth facility, and request for waiver and modification of performance criteria, EBS/01/46. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
28.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2002). Operational guidance note for staff following the 2002 biennial surveillance review, SM/02/292. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
29.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2003a). India—Staff report for the 2003 article IV consultation, SM/03/221. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
30.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2003b). People’s Republic of China—Staff report for the 2003 article IV consultation, SM/03/316. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
31.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2003c). Italy—Staff report for the 2003 article IV consultation, SM/03/358. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
32.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2004a). People’s Republic of China—Staff report for the 2004 article IV consultation, SM/04/221. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
33.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2004b). India—Staff report for the 2004 article IV consultation, SM/04/431. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
34.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2004c). Republic of Tajikistan—Third review under the three-year arrangement under the poverty reduction and growth facility and request for waiver of performance criterion, EBS/04/98. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
35.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2005a). Italy—Staff report for the 2004 article IV consultation, SM/05/10. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
36.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2005b). Review of fund work on trade, SM/05/57. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
37.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2005c). People’s Republic of China—Staff report for the 2005 article IV consultation, SM/05/261. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
38.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2005d). India—Staff report for the 2005 article IV consultation, SM/05/430. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
39.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2005e). Republic of Tajikistan—Staff report for the 2004 article IV consultation and fourth review under the poverty reduction and growth facility, EBS/05/38. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
40.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2005f). Republic of Tajikistan—Fifth review under the poverty reduction and growth facility and request for waiver of performance criterion, EBS/05/105. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
41.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2006a). Italy—Staff report for the 2005 article IV consultation, SM/06/11. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
42.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2006b). Italy—Financial system stability assessment, SM/06/15. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
43.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2006c). People’s Republic of China—Staff report for the 2006 article IV consultation, SM/06/248. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
44.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2006d). Republic of Tajikistan—Sixth review under the poverty reduction and growth facility, EBS/06/10. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
45.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2007a). Global financial stability report: Market developments and issues. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
46.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2007b). Regional economic outlook: Europe: Strengthening financial systems. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
47.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2007c). Italy—Staff report for the 2006 article IV consultation, SM/07/20. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
48.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2007d). Republic of Tajikistan—Staff report for the 2006 article IV consultation, SM/07/94. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
49.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2008). Republic of Tajikistan—Financial system stability assessment, SM/08/190. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
50.
Koeva, P. (2002). The performance of Indian banks during financial liberalization. In India—Selected issues and statistical appendix, Chapter V, SM/02/181. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
51.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 265–301.
52.
Langlois, J.D., Jr. (2001). The WTO and China’s financial system. The China Quarterly, 167(September), 610–29.
53.
Leigh, L., & Podpiera, R. (2006). The rise of foreign investment in China’s banking system. In People’s Republic of China—Selected issues, Chapter VI, SM/06/249. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
54.
McGuire, G., & Schuele, M. (2000). Restrictiveness of international trade in banking services. In C. Findlay and T. Warren (Eds), Impediments to trade in services: Measurement and policy implications. London and New York: Routledge.
55.
Ocampo, J.A., & Stiglitz, J.E. (Eds). (2008). Capital market liberalisation and development. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
Podpiera, R. (2005). Progress in banking reform. In People’s Republic of China—Selected issues, Chapter IV, SM/05/273. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
57.
Prasad, A., & Ghosh, S. (2005). Competition in Indian banking. IMF Working Paper 05/141. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
58.
Robinson, D., Dorsey, T., & Zebregs, H. (2000). China: A preliminary assessment of the impact of WTO accession. In People’s Republic of China—Selected issues, Chapter III, SM/00/166, Supplement 1. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
59.
Roy, M., Marchetti, J., & Lim, H. (2007). Services liberalisation in the new generation of preferential trade agreements: How much further than the GATS?World Trade Review, 6(2), 155–92.
60.
Stern, R.M. (2009). Trade in financial services—Has the IMF been involved constructively?IEO Background Paper, BP/09/05. IMF Independent Evaluation Office. Available at http://www.ieo-imf.org/eval/complete/eval_06162009.html (accessed on 10 October 2010).
61.
Towe, C. (2001). Structural policies and the report of the prime minister’s economic advisory council. In India—Recent economic developments and selected issues, Chapter VI, SM/01/160. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
62.
World Bank (2007a). Survey on impediments to international integration (unpublished; Washington: The World Bank).
63.
World Bank (2007b). Database on services trade restrictions (unpublished; Washington: The World Bank).
