Though a logically tight case for infant industry protection has never been made, proprotection authors have claimed its truth since at least its statement by Alexander Hamilton in 1791. In the 1970s and the 1980s, the argument had receded into the background following its influential critiques by trade economists James Meade, Harry Johnson and Robert Baldwin. But globalisation critics have recently revived it giving it new guises. This requires a fresh response from pro-free trade economists so that the fog is removed yet again and clear thinking restored. Accordingly, in this paper, I revisit the argument and its logical flaws. I demonstrate that the new packaging provided by proprotection authors cannot hide the fundamental logical flaws in the argument. Nor is there compelling evidence of successful infant industry promotion once the costs and benefits are both taken into account instead of just the benefits. The argument is often pegged on externalities. But once the precise source of the externality is pinned down, protection as an instrument to correct it turns out to be ineffective.
Amsden, Alice H. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Baldwin, R.F. (1969). The case against infant-industry tariff protection. Journal of Political Economy, 77(5–6), 295–305.
3.
Bastable, Charles F. (1887). The theory of international trade. Dublin: Hodges, Figgis.
4.
Beason, R., & Weinstein, David E. (1996). Growth, economies of scale, and targeting in Japan (1955–1990). The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 286–95.
5.
Becker, G.S. (1964). Human capital. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
Bhagwati, Jagdish (1999). The ‘miracle’ that did happen. In Erik Thorbecke and Henry Wan (Eds), Taiwan’s development experience: Lessons on roles of government and market (pp. 21–39). Boston: Kulwer Academic Publishers.
7.
Bhagwati, J., & Ramaswami, V.K. (1963). Domestic distortions, tariffs, and the theory of optimum subsidy. Journal of Political Economy, 71(1), 44–50.
8.
Chang, Ha-Joon (2007). Bad samaritans: Rich nations, poor policies and the threat to the developing world. London: Random House Business Books.
9.
Corden, Max (1997). Trade policy and economic welfare. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
Dosi G., Zysman, J., & Tyson, L. D’Andrea (1992). Trade, technology and development: A framework for discussing Japan. In C. Johnson, L.D. Tyson and J. Zysman (Eds), Politics and productivity: The real story of why Japan works. New York: Ballenger.
11.
Frankel, J., & Rose, A. (2002). An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 437–66.
12.
Greenwald, B., & Stiglitz, J.E. (2006). Helping infant economies grow: Foundations of trade policies for developing countries. American Economic Review, 96(2), 141–46.
13.
Grubel, H.G. (1966). The anatomy of classical and modern infant industry arguments. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 97-II, 325–44.
14.
Hamilton, A. (1913). Report on manufactures [1791]. Presented by Mr. Smoot, 30 August 1913, 63rd Congress, 1st Session, Document No. 172.
15.
Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603–33.
16.
Imbs, J., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Stages of diversification. American Economic Review, 93(1), 63–86.
17.
Irwin, D. (1996). Against the tide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
Johnson, Harry G. (1965). Optimal trade intervention in the presence of domestic distortions. In R. Caves, H. Johnson and P. Kenen (Eds), Trade, growth and balance of payments, pp. 3–34. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.
19.
Kemp, M.C. (1960). The Mill–Bastable infant industry dogma. Journal of Political Economy, 68(1), 65–67.
20.
Lall, S. (2003). Roberts on infant industries: Another comment, Oxford Development Studies, 31(1), 14–17.
21.
List, F. (1856). National system of political economy (trans from the German by E.A. Matile). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
22.
Little, I.M.D. (1996). Picking winners: East Asian experience. The Social Market Foundation Occasional Paper, 1 February.
23.
Little, I., Scitovsky, T., & Scott, M. (1970). Industry and trade in some developing countries. London: Oxford University Press.
24.
Meade, J. (1955). Trade and welfare. London: Oxford University Press.
25.
Mill, John Stuart. (1909[1848]). Principles of political economy. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
26.
Ranis, G. (2003). Symposium on infant industries: A comment. Oxford Development Studies, 31(1), 33–35.
27.
Reinert, Erik (2007). How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. London: Constable and Robinson.
28.
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: John Murray, Albemarle-Street.
29.
Rodrik, D. (2000). Comment on Frankel and Rose. Unpublished, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
30.
Rodrik, D. (2006). Industrial development: Stylized facts and policies. In David O’Connor (Ed.), Industrial development for the 21st century: Sustainable development perspectives (pp. 7–28). New York: UN-DESA.
31.
Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32.
Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations, Volumes I and II (Everyman’s Library with introduction by Edwin R.A. Seligman). London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
33.
Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of the government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
Wade, R. (2003). Reply to John Roberts on infant industry protection. Oxford Development Studies, 31(1), 8–14.
35.
Wade, R. (2004). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of the government in East Asian industrialization (second paperback edition with a new introduction). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36.
Westphal, L.E. (1990). Industrial policy in an export-propelled economy: Lessons from South Korea’s experience. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), 41–59.
