This paper examines the livelihood vulnerabilities and coping strategies of char dwellers through a field study conducted in Mana Char. The analysis of their responses underscores the complexities of perceived agrarian threats and vulnerabilities of the Char inhabitants. It also suggests the need for re-examining the narrative of environmental risk and vulnerability within which chars are usually viewed. This study emphasises the component of subjectivity in perceiving agrarian threats. In doing so, it puts across the subtle differences in conceptualising agrarian threats in a char ecology and argues for ruling out the possibility of any generalisation regarding the environment of char and the operability of social life in it.
AlamR., MalakA., & QuaderM. A. (2018). Livelihood vulnerability of char land people in Brahmaputra-Jamuna river system. Jagannath University Journal of Life and Earth Sciences, 4(1), 54–64.
2.
BaruaC. R., & SinghaM. G. (2020). Agricultural practices and sustainability among the char inhabitants of Sipajhar development block of Darrang district, Assam. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 8(10), 3744–3751.
3.
BhattacharyaN. (2023). Cities of refuge; republics of char stateless in South Asia. In ChakrabortyG. (Ed.), Citizenship in contemporary times (pp. 55–70). Routledge.
4.
BhattacharyyaK., & WileyM. J. (2014). Dams, riparian settlement and the threat of climate change in a dynamic fluvial environment: A case study of the Damodar River, India. In NusserM. (Ed.), Large dams in Asia (pp. 75–100). Springer.
5.
ChakrabarttyS. K. (2024). People beyond the border in the sandbars of Damodar River: understanding the people’s management in a changing landscape, India. International Journal of River Basin Management, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2289942
6.
ChakrabortyG., & MominH. (2023). Measuring impermanence: A community perspective on char land. Ecology, Economy and Society—The INSEE Journal, 60(1), 123–131.
7.
DoboE., Fekete-FarkasM., SinghM. K., & SzucsI. (2006). Ecological-economic analysis of climate change on food system and agricultural vulnerability: A brief overview. Cereal Research Communications, 34(1), 777–780.
8.
HammillA., LeclercL., Myatt-HirvonenO., & SalinasZ. (2005). Using the sustainable livelihoods approach to reduce vulnerability to climate change. In RobledoC., KanninenM. & PedroniL. (Eds.), Tropical forests and adaptation to climate change: In search of synergies (pp. 71–96). Center for International Forestry Research.
9.
HossainM. A. (2024). Charting fields of uncertainty: Disaster, displacement and resilience in Bangladeshi char villages. In AlimardanianM. & HeffernanT. (Eds.), The anthropology of ambiguity (pp. 103–118). Manchester University Press.
10.
Lahiri-DuttK., & SamantaG. (2007). ‘Like the drifting grains of sand’: Vulnerability, security and adjustment by communities in the charlands of the Damodar River, India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 30(2), 327–349.
11.
Lahiri-DuttK., & SamantaG. (2013). Dancing with the river: People and life on the chars of South Asia. Yale University Press.
12.
Lahiri-DuttK., & SamantaG. (2016). Home-making and regrounding: Lives of Bangladeshi migrants on the Damodar charlands of lower Bengal, India. In Ganguly-ScraseR. & Lahiri-DuttK. (Eds.), Rethinking displacement: Asia Pacific perspectives (pp. 197–220). Ashgate.
13.
LintonJ., & BuddsJ. (2014). The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 57, 170–180.
14.
MukherjeeJ. & Lahiri-DuttK. (2021). South Asian chars as destabilizers. In ZamanM. & AlamM. (Eds.), Living on the edge: Char dwellers in Bangladesh (pp. 25–40). Springer Nature.
15.
PandaA. (2009). Assessing vulnerability to climate change in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(16), 18–24.
16.
PandeyV., BajpaiO., PandeyD., & SinghN. (2015). Saccharum spontaneum: An underutilized tall grass for revegetation and restoration programs. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 62, 443–450.
17.
SaikiaM., & MahantaR. (2023). Measurement of vulnerability to climate change in char areas: A survey. Ecology, Economy and Society—The INSEE Journal, 6(1), 13–30.
18.
SamantaG., & Lahiri-DuttK. (2005). Uncertain livelihoods: Survival strategies of women and men in charland environments in India [Resource Management in Asia-Pacific Working Papers]. Australian National University.
19.
SarkerU. K., KaysarM. S., UddinM. R., HossainM. A., HassanS., & HassanM. M. (2022). Exploring farmers’ insight on cropping pattern for sustainable crop production in char area of Bangladesh. Sustainability, 14(3), 1745.
20.
SinghP., & PalS. (2021). Livelihood vulnerability assessment of the island (char) dwellers in the Ganges Riparian Corridor, India. GeoJournal, 87, 3701–3717.
21.
ToufiqueK. A., & YunusM. (2013). Vulnerability of livelihoods in the coastal districts of Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 36(1), 95–120.
