This study analyses household access and persons’ uses of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in India by using the latest National Sample Survey Organization’s (NSSO) Education survey (2017–2018) datasets. Accordingly, an ICT Index is computed, and a logistic model is applied to examine the pattern and likelihood of digital technology usage and access. The result shows that access to ICTs is lower in rural areas and access increases with the level of education. The study also observes that factors like education, income and regional variations are significant aspects of the disproportionate uses and access of ICTs at the household and individual levels. This study also observed that the low level of access to ICTs will be a huge challenge for the Government to ensure alternate online or virtual modes of education.
AlkireS. (2008). Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty. In KakwaniN. and SilberJ. (Eds.), The many dimensions of poverty. Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
AlkireS., & SantosM. E. (2014). Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: Robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index. World Development, 59, 251–274.
3.
AlkireS., FosterJ. E., SethS., SantosM. E., RocheJ., & BallonP. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis: Chapter 5–the Alkire-Foster counting methodology [Working Paper No. 86]. Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI), Oxford Department of International Development, Queen Elizabeth House (QEH), University of Oxford.
4.
BulmanG., & FairlieR. W. (2016). Technology and education: Computers, software, and the internet [Working Paper No. 22237]. National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
DhawanS. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22.
6.
EscuetaM., QuanV., NickowA. J., & OreopoulosP. (2017). Education technology: An evidence-based review [Working Paper No. w23744]. National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
FairlieR. W. (2005). The effects of home computers on school enrollment. Economics of Education review, 24(5), 533–547.
8.
FisherC., DwyerD. C., & YocamK. (1996). Education and technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms. Jossey-Bass.
9.
HuxholdO., HeesE., & WebsterN. J. (2020). Towards bridging the grey digital divide: changes in internet access and its predictors from 2002 to 2014 in Germany. European Journal of Ageing, 17, 271–280.
10.
KarakaraA. A. W., OsabuohienE. S., & ChenL. (2019). Households’ ICT access and educational vulnerability of children in Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1701877.
11.
KhoK., LakdawalaL., & NakasoneE. (2019). Impact of internet access on student learning in Peruvian schools. http://econ.msu.edu/repec/wp/Draft04-08-18.pdf
12.
KleineD., HollowD., & PvedaS. (2013). Children, ICT and development capturing the potential, meeting the challenges. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/715-children-ict-and-development-capturing-the-potential-meeting-the-challenges.html
13.
LevinD., & ArafehS. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248797887_The_Digital_Disconnect_The_Widening_Gap_Between_Internet-Savvy_Students_and_Their_Schools
14.
MHRD. (2020). Guidelines on Digital/Online Education provide a roadmap for carrying forward online education with enhanced quality. PIB.
15.
MishraU. S., & ShuklaV. (2016). Welfare comparisons with multidimensional well-being indicators: An Indian illustration. Social Indicators Research, 129(2), 505–525.
16.
NCERT. (2020). Students’ learning enhancement guidelines. ministry of education, government of India. https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/announcement/Learning_%20Enhancement_Guidelines.pdf
17.
PatrinosH. A., & ShmisT. (2020). Can technology help mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on education systems in Europe and Central Asia? [Blog post]. https://blogs.worldbank.org/europeandcentralasia/can-technology-help-mitigate-impact-covid-19-education-systems-europe-and
18.
PressS. J., & WilsonS. (1978). Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(364), 699–705.
19.
SinghV., & ThurmanA. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? Asystematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306.
20.
Swabhiman. (2020). Digital education in India: Will students with disability miss the bus. https://thedispatchondisability.files.wordpress.com/2020/10/report-on-digital-education-and-cwds.pdf
21.
TrueckS., & RachevS. T. (2009). Rating based modeling of credit risk: Theory and application of migration matrices. Academic Press.
22.
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO.
23.
UNESCO. (2020). UIS Education Data Release: September 2019 [Information Paper No. 59 September 2019 UIS/2019/ED/IP/59]. www.chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip59-uis-education-data-release-september-2019.pdf
24.
UNICEF. (2020). Children, HIV and AIDS: How will progress be impacted by COVID-19?https://data.unicef.org/resources/children-hiv-and-aids-how-will-progress-be-impacted-by-covid-19/
25.
UNICEF. (2020). Media factsheet: Unequal access to remote schooling amid COVID-19 threatens to deepen global learning crisis-An overview of South Asia. https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/unequal-access-remote-schooling-amid-covid-19-threatens-deepen-global-learning
26.
United Nation. (2020). Policy brief: education during COVID-19 and beyond. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf
27.
WomenC. (2019). The mobile gender gap report 2018. GSMA.
