AndersonJames, ‘The Modernity of the Modern State’ in AndersonJames (ed.), The Rise of the Modern State (Brighton, Sussex: Wheatsheaf, 1986), p. 9.
2.
MillerDonald F., The Reason of Metaphor: A Study of Politics (New York: Sage, 1992), p. 169. See, ChakrabartiAnindita, ‘Nation-State, Communities and Identity: A Case Study of Recent Sikh Militancy’, unpublished M. Phil. Dissertation, Dept, of Sociology, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, 1996, p. 72.
3.
For an exploration of this connection between territoriality and modernity, see,WeberMax, ‘Politics as a Vocation’ in GerthH.H.MillsC.W. (eds.), From Max Weber (New York: OUP, 1972). Also, JamesAnderson, op. cit., Chap. 1. Also, GiddensAnthony, Social Theory and Modern Sociology (Stanford, Calif.: Standford University Press, 1987), Chap. 7. Also, PoggiGianfranco, The State: Its Nature, Development and Prospects (Stanford, Calif.: Standford University Press, 1990), Chap. 1. Also, PiersonChristopher, The Modern State (London: Routledge, 1996), Chap. 2. ForWalkerR.B.J., however, the connection is to say the least, tenuous. According to him, the scholars of international relations have found the thesis that ‘the well-established accounts of reason, progress and Enlightenment’ characteristic of modernity depend on ‘a prior claim that there is a political community in which reason, progress and Enlightenment’ might unfold’, ‘highly problematic’. There is no reason to think that modernity project necessarily confines itself to the territorial scope of a ‘modem’ state and does not move beyond it. See, WalkerR.B.J., Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: CUP, 1993), p. 61. But that at any given point of time, modernity and territoriality of the nation-state may coincide with each other is, as he admits, beyond any doubt.
4.
ChatterjeeShibashis, ‘The State in International Relations Reconsidered’ in International Studies, 35 (3), 1998.
5.
SamaddarRanabir, ‘The Failed Dialectic of Territoriality and Security, and the Imperatives of Dialogue’ in International Studies, 35(1), 1998.
6.
BhaumikSubir, ‘North-East India: The Evolution of a Post-Colonial Region’ in ChatterjeePartha (ed.), Wages of Freedom: Fifty Years of Indian Nation-State (Delhi: OUP, 1998). Also, SubirBhaumik, ‘The North-East India: Fifty Years after Partition’ in SamaddarRanabir (ed.), Reflections on Partition in the East (New Delhi: Vikas, 1997), pp. 140–61.
7.
SlaterDavid, ‘Spatial Politics/Social Movements: Questions of (b) order and resistance in global times’ in PileSteveKeithMichael (eds.), Geographies of Resistance (London: Routledge, 1997), p. 267.
8.
DeleuzeGilles & GuattariFelix, What Is Philosophy?, trans. by BurchellGrahamTomlinsonHugh, (London: Verso, 1994), p. 90.
9.
BraudelFemand, On History, trans. by MathewsSarah (London: The University of Chicago Press, 1980), p. 115.
10.
AndersonMalcolm, Frontiers: Theory and State Formation in the Modern World (Cambridge: Polity, 1996), p. 35.
11.
An Abstract Copy of the Resolution Passed in the Emergency Meeting at the Executive Committee — United Naga Council‘, Imphal, October, 1992.
12.
HaokipP.S.. Zalen‘-gam: The Land of Kukis (Kuki Zalen’ — gam: Kuki National Organization, May1995), p. 83.
13.
Ibid., p. 40.
14.
DevalleSusana B.C., Discourses on Ethnicity: Culture and Protest in Jharkhand (New Delhi: Sage, 1992), p. 134.
15.
Quoted inRayAnimesh, Mizoram: Dynamics of Change (Calcutta: Pearl Publishers, 1982), pp. 159–60.
16.
See, Kumar DasSamir, ULFA: A Political Analysis (Delhi: Ajanta, 1994), p. 97.
17.
Report of the States’ Reorganization Commission (New Delhi: Publications Division, 1995), p. 46.
18.
Kumar DasSamir, ‘War, Population Movement and the Formation of State System in South Asia’ (mimeo.)
19.
BandyppadhyayHiranmoy, Udbastu (In Bengali) (Calcutta: Sahitya Samsad, 1970).
20.
DasSamir Kumar, ‘Internal Displacement in North-Eastern India: A Critical Review’ in PhukonGirin (ed.), Essays in Honour of Prof. B. Pakem (New Delhi: South Asian, 1999), forthcoming.
21.
FuchsStephen, Godmen on the Warpath (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1992), pp. 136–51.
22.
For an appreciation, see, GiddensAnthony, op. cit.
23.
I have discussed the inherent limits of such subjectivity inKumar DasSamir, ‘National Security and the New Rights Discourse in Northeastern India’ in BhattacharyaSanjukta B.DasRochana (eds.). Perspectives on India’s North-East (Calcutta: Bibhasa. 1998), pp. 59–62.
24.
See, KavirajSudipta, ‘Filth and the Public Sphere: Concept and Prectices about Space in Calcutta’ in Public Culture, 10 (1), 1998, pp. 33–113.
25.
GellnerErnest, Nations and Nationalism (Oxford; Basil Blackwell, 1983), pp. 37–8.
26.
Quoted inLuithuiLuingamHaksarNandita (eds.), Nagaland File: A Question of Human Rights (New Delhi: Lancer, 1984), p. 118.
27.
AndersonBenedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1991), p. 30.
28.
BoraLakshminandan, Akou Saraighat (in Assames) (Pathsala: Bani Prakash, 1980).
29.
There has developed a whole, new literature on this. I have discussed the problem in the context of north-eastern region inKumar DasSamirBhattacharyaSanjukta B.DasRochana, op. cit.
30.
MellorRoy E.H., Nation, State and Territory: A Political Geography (London: Routledge, 1989), p. 58.
31.
32.
CastoriadisCornelius, The Imaginary Institution of Society, trans. by BlarneyKathleen (Cambridge: Polity, 1975), p. 3.
33.
Kumar DasSamir, ‘Ethnic Insurgencies in North-Eastern India’ in PakemB. (ed.), Insurgency in North-Eastern India (New Delhi: Omsons, 1997).
34.
See, BhaumikSubirSamaddarRanabir (ed.), op. cit.
35.
BalibarEtienne, Masses, Classes and Ideas: Studies on Politics and Philosophy before and after Marx, trans. by SwensonJames (New York: Routledge, 1994), p. 67.
36.
See, Barak Upatyaka Banga Sahitya O Sanskriti Sammelan, Barak Upatyaka Prasanga: Satya O Tathya (in Bengali) (Karimganj: General Secretary, BUBSOSS, n.d.).
37.
BuldulImad Uddin, Bhasha Andolaner Uttaradhikar (in Bengali) (Silchar: Milan Prakashani, 1997).