HellerAgnesFeherFerenc, The Postmodern Political Condition, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1988, p. 119.
2.
For an elaboration of these approaches see GaddisJohn Lewis, “International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War”, International Security, Winter1992-93 (Vol. 17 No. 3), pp. 323–388.
3.
MorgenthauHans J., Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, Fourth (Indian) edn., Scientific Book Agency, Calcutta, 1969, pp. 10–11.
4.
Singer, “The Incomplete Theorist” p. 68, quoted in Gaddis, op. cit., p. 331.
5.
Waltz, Theory of International Politics, pp. 174–175.
6.
Cf. RockStephen R., Why Peace Breaks out: Great Power Rapprochement in Historical Perspective (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989).
7.
See BarryBrian, The Liberal Theory of Justice, pp. 128–133.
8.
NozickRobert, Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974). According to Nozick, any theory of ‘distributive justice’, which concentrates not on just transfer but on the end state of a distribution goes against the philosophically defensible ideas of the just transaction and as such should be rejected as a covert justification of injustice. Applied to the international order, Nozick’s views would strongly defend the status quo as proceeding from what he calls a ‘just original acquisition’.
9.
BeitzCharles, Political Theory and International Relations, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1979) pp. 127–176.
10.
See Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 457.
11.
Beitz, op. cit., p. 128.
12.
Beitz, op. cit., p. 132.
13.
See BrownCris, “Critical Theory and Post-modernism in International Relations” in Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory (eds. A.J.R.GroomLightMargot), Pinter Publishers, London, 1944, pp. 57–58.
14.
BrownChris, op. cit., p. 59.
15.
Cf. CoxRobert W., “Gramsci, Hegemony, and International Relations” in Approaches to World Order (by CoxSinclairTimothy), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
16.
Cox, op. cit., p. 137.
17.
Cox, op. cit., p. 140.
18.
Cf.Cox, loc. cit.
19.
Cf“Introduction”, international Justice and the Third World: Studies in the Philosophy of Development, ed. AttfieldRobinWilkinsBarry, Routledge, London and New York, 1992, pp. 1–16.
20.
Cf.O’NeillOnora, “Justice, gender and international boundaries”, in AttfieldWilkins (eds). op. cit., pp. 5–76.
21.
DowerNiger, “Sustainability and the right to development”, in AttfieldWilkins (eds), op. cit. pp. 93–116.
22.
O’Neill, loc. cit.
23.
Dower, loc. cit.
24.
Ch I (pp. 17–34) in AttfieldWilkins (eds), op. cit.
25.
Nielsen, op. cit., p. 17.
26.
Cf. SenAmartya, Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1981, and also his subsequent work on Inequality.
27.
HallidayFred, Rethinking International Relations, Mac Millan, London, 1994, p. 73.