In many quarters, arms control is understood as a means of preserving a nation’s vital interests while minimizing the economic cost and maximizing the military effectiveness of security. See, ThompsonW. ScottKiernanRobert E., “Startegy and Arms Control: Political Will and Public Diplomacy” in StarrRichard F. (ed.), Arms Control: Myth and Reality (California: Hoover Institution Press, 1984). pp. 76–77.
2.
See LairdRobbin F.HerspringDale R., The Soviet Union and Strategic Arms (Boulder: Westview, 1984), pp. 10–11.
3.
Ibid., p. 90.
4.
SokolovskiiV.D. (ed.), Soviet Military Strategy (Santa Monica: RAND, 1963). p. 299.
5.
Ibid., p. 305.
6.
KreponMichael, Strategic Stalemate: Nuclear Weapons and Arms Control in American Politics (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1984), p. 30. See also in this context, EnthovenAlainSmithWayne K., How Much Is Enough? (New York: Harper and Row. 1971).
7.
NormanPolmer, Strategic Weapons (New York: Crane Russak, 1982), p. 4.
8.
SnowDonald M., Nuclear Strategy in a Dynamic World (Alabama: University of Alabama Press, 1981). p. 82.
9.
LeeWilliam T., Understanding the Soviet Military Threat (New York: National Startegy Information Center, 1977), p. 44. Quoted in Snow. No. 8. p. 139.
10.
PalitD.K., War in the Deterrent Age (London: Macdonald, 1966), p. 153.
11.
GrayColin S.PayneKeith, “Victory is Possible”. Foreign Policy, No. 39, Summer1980, p. 21. In 1988, Gray proceeded to argue: “Theoretically, arms races, crises and even wars can be won in the nuclear age. Moreover, painful though a nuclear victory would certainly be, there is no good reason to suppose that such a victory must be virtually indistinguishable from defeat or that such a victory would not be worth attaining…”GrayColin S.Nuclear Strategy and National Style (London: Hamilton Press, 1986), pp. 259–60.
12.
AlexievAlex R., “The Soviet Campaign against INF: Strategy, Tactics and Means”. Orbis, Summer1985, p. 319.
13.
HollowayDavid, The Soviet Union and the Arms Race (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983), p. 72.
14.
DeanJonathan, “Gorbachev’s Arms Control Moves”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, June1987, p. 37.
15.
For elaboration on these points see MajumdarAnindyo J., “Arms Control, Alliances and Military Balance: Illusion and Reality”, Strategic Analysis, August1995, pp. 711–28.
16.
See ArkinWilliam and NorrisRobert, “Tinynukes for Mini Minds”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April1992, pp. 24–25.
17.
The Hindustan Times (New Delhi), September13, 1994, p. 14.
18.
A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement, The White House, U.S.A., February1996.