For elaboration see LegaultAlbert, The End of a Military Century? (Ottawa, Ontario: International Development Research Centre, 1992), pp. 2–8.
2.
ErasmusDesiderius (1466-1536) ScholarDutch.
3.
Cited in Legault, note 1, p. 2.
4.
WeberMax, “Politics as a Vocation”, in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology ed. and translated, GirthHans andMillsC. Wright, New York: The Free Press, 1946.
5.
ClausewitzCarl Von., On War, ed, and trans HowardM.ParetP., (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976); also KleinBradley S., Strategic Studies and World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 39–53.
6.
KnorrKlaus, On the Uses of Military Power in the Nuclear Age, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.
7.
For details seeHoffmarnStanley, “Choices”, Foreign Policy, Fall, 1973, pp. 3–42; and KnorrKlaus. “On the International Uses of Military Force in the Contemporary World.”, In SondermanFred A.McLellanDavid S.OlsonWilliam C., The Theory and Practice of International Relations (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1979), p. 190.
8.
ThorbeckeWilliam J., A New Dimension in Political Thinking (New York and Leyden: Oceana Publications, 1965), p. 126.
9.
See. KnorrKlaus, “On the International Uses of Military Force in Contemporary World”, Orbis, Vol. 21, No. 1; reprinted in Sonderman, Mchellan and Olson, note 7.
10.
Ibid., p. 195.
11.
Ibid.
12.
Some of the best known of such works areWoodDavid, Conflict in Twentieth Century (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies. Adelphi Paper No. 48, 1968) BlechmanBarry M.KoplanStephen S., The Use of the Armed Forces as a Political Instrument (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1976); BarringerRichard E., War. Patterns of Conflict: (Cambridge, M.A.: Massachusetts Instititue of Technology Press, 1972): and KayeG.D.GrantD.A.EmondE.J., Major Armed Conflict: A Compendium of Interestate and Intrastate Conflict 1720-1985, Ottawa: Operational Research and Analysis Establishment, ORAE Report 95, 1985.
13.
Kayeet al., note 12. p. 28.
14.
Legault, p. 58.
15.
BacevichA.J.. “The Use of Force in Our Time”, The Wilson Quarterly. Winter. 1995. p. 51.
16.
Ibid., p. 51.
17.
HolumJohn D., “Post-Cold War Weapons Spread Spurs Need for Arms Control”, USIS News Feature, Dhaka, 9November1995; see also KlareMicheal T., “The New Challenges to Global Security”, Current History, Vol. 92. No. 573, April1993. p. 160.
18.
This has been hailed as“a momentuous national security achievement for the United States and for all nations”. Cited in Holum, Note 17, p. 3.
19.
For details on the post-Cold War role of the United Nations see GiandomenicoPicco, “The U.N. and the Use of Force”, Foreign Affairs, September-October1994, pp. 14–18.
20.
NiemeyerGerhart, “The Probability of War in Our Time”, in LercheCharles O.Jr.LercheMargaret E. (eds.) Readings in International Politics: Concepts and Issues (New York: Oxford University Press, 1961) p. 322.
21.
BullMedley, The Anarchical Society (New York: Columbia University Press. 1977) p. 187.
22.
RosenSteven R.JonesWalter S.. The Logic of International Relations, Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop Publishers. 1977.
23.
For details see Syed AnwarHusain. “Prospect of Peace in South Asia: Politico-Strategic Perspective”. South Asian Survey, Vol. 1, No. 2. July-December1994. pp. 242–44; and HusainSyed Anwar, “Democracy and Cooperation in South Asia: Interface and the Way Ahead”, paper presented at conference on Democratization and the prospect of Regional Cooperaton in South Asia held on 8-9 November 1995 in New Delhi under the joint sponsorship of the Indian Council for Regional Cooperation (ICRC) and the Coalition for South Asian Cooperation (CSAC).
24.
RosenauJames N., “Security in a Turbulent World”,Current History. Vol. 94. No. 592. May1995. p. 196.