The Chakma refugees in India display a unique combination of humanitarian need, legal ambiguity, strategic statecraft, and regional diplomacy. During the Partition and the construction of the Kaptai Dam, the Chakmas were displaced from their ancestral lands in East Pakistan. They were relocated to Arunachal Pradesh by the Indian state. This act of the Indian government aimed to address both humanitarian concerns and national security purposes. However, they faced discrimination and political exclusion. Despite being eligible for Indian citizenship and repeated declarations by the Supreme Court and the National Human Rights Commission, state resistance—due to endemic stress and politics—has prevented peaceful integration. My article revisits the Chakma issue through academic literature, policy analysis, and judicial decisions. It also studies the historical and legal aspects of the Chakma crisis. While still appreciating India’s approach in comparison to other nations, my article argues that the Chakma case exposes structural weaknesses in India’s refugee policy. It concludes with a call for legal reforms rooted in constitutional values and human dignity.
BeniwalR. N.2022. ‘Chakma Refugees and India–Bangladesh Relations’. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences12, no. 9: 199–226.
2.
ChakmaA. B.2014. ‘Peacebuilding in the Chittagong Hill Tract (CHT): An Institutionalist Approach’. Journal of Asiatic Society of Bangladesh59, no. 1: 111–138.
3.
Chakma Rights and Development Organisation. 2020, February15. What is the Origin of the Chakmas?. https://crdo.chakma.in/faqs/what-is-the-origin-of-the-chakmas-and-hajongs/
4.
ChimniB. S.1994. ‘The Legal Condition of Refugees in India’. Journal of Refugee Studies7, no. 4: 378–401.
5.
ChodanN.2022. ‘Forced Migration and the Plight of the Chakma Refugees in Arunachal Pradesh: ‘Citizenship’ as a Bone of Contention’. Journal of Migration History8, no. 3: 483–512.
6.
Committee for C.R. of C.A.P. & Ors v. State of Arunachal Pradesh & Ors, Supreme Court of India, September 17, 2015. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/163542302/
7.
D’SamiB.2022. ‘The Refugee Convention of 1951: India’s Persisting Dilemma’. In The Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India, edited by RajanS. I., 192–202. New Delhi: Routledge India.
8.
DebnathK., & DebnathK.. 2020. ‘Chakma Refugees in Arunachal Pradesh: Their Inclusion and Setback’. In Refugee Crises and Third-World Economies: Policies and Perspectives, 137–148. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-190-520201015
9.
GhoshalA.2018. ‘Statelessness or Permanent Rehabilitation: Issues Relating to the Chakmas of Chittagong Hill Tract in Arunachal Pradesh and Tripura’. In Marginalities in India, edited by BhattacharyyaA. and BasuS., 289–308. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5215-6_18
10.
Government of Bangladesh and Parbatya Chattagram Jana Sanghati Samiti. 1997. Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace Accord. https://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/bangladesh/document/papers/bd971202chittagong%20hill%20tracts%20peace%20accord.pdf
11.
Government of India. 2016. Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2016. https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_parliament/2015/Bill%20NO%20121-Citizenship.pdf
12.
Government of India. 2019. Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019. https://www.india.gov.in/sites/upload_files/npi/files/coi_laws/Citizenship%20%28Amendment%29%20Act%202019.pdf
13.
HazarikaS.2000. Rites of Passage: Border Crossings, Imagined Homelands, India’s East and Bangladesh. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
14.
IzzatM.2022. ‘The Chakmas’ Struggle for Citizenship: Breaking Down India’s Citizenship Acquisition Regime’. NUJS Law Review15, no. 3–4: 346–358.
15.
JhalaA. D.2023. ‘Dam(n)ing the Hills: Indigeneity, American Aid, and Cold War Politics in the Kaptai Dam, East Pakistan, 1957–1964’. Modern Asian Studies57, no. 1: 70–99.
16.
KharatR. S.2003, February7–8. From Internal Displacement to Refugees: The Trauma of Chakmas in Bangladesh. Paper presented at Researching Internal Displacement: State of the Art, International Conference on IDPs, Trondheim, Norway. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.605.4512&rep=rep1&type=pdf
17.
KumarK. C. R.2020. ‘Bangladeshi Migration to India: The Causal Factors at the Origin’. Artha Journal of Social Sciences19, no. 4: 63–83.
18.
KumarA.2024. ‘Refugees in the Views of the World’. Motherhood International Journal of Research and Innovation1, no. 1: 99–106.
19.
National Human Rights Commission v. State of Arunachal Pradesh & Anr., Supreme Court of India, January9, 1996. https://share.google/WDkBAWZw6uwIo5JNI
20.
National Human Rights Commission, India. 2021, May20. NHRC Notices to the Centre, States and UTs over Alleged Denial of Benefits During COVID Pandemic under PMGKAY and IMPDS Due to Non-completion of Biometric Authentication of Beneficiaries. Press Release, New Delhi. https://share.google/J5xZ07I442RRy3fct
21.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India. 1978. 1 SCC 248.
22.
PrasadC.2006. ‘Migration and the Question of Citizenship: People of Chittagong Hill Tract in Arunachal Pradesh’. The Indian Journal of Political Science67, no. 2: 471–490.
23.
PrasadC.2007. ‘Student’s Movement in Arunachal Pradesh and the Chakma–Hajong Refugee Problem’. Economic & Political Weekly42, no. 15: 1373–1379.
24.
PrasadC.2010. ‘Refugees and Human Rights: Comparative Studies between Chakmas in India and Biharis in Bangladesh’. In Development Issues in Contemporary India, edited by BijuM. R., 238–262. New Delhi: Concept Publishing.
25.
SakyaV.2022, August24. A Glimpse History of Chakmas Migration to Arunachal Pradesh. Chakma Digital Library. https://chakmalibrary.net/2022/08/24/bor-porong/
26.
SarkerS. P.2017. Refugee Law in India: The Road from Ambiguity to Protection. Singapore: Springer.
27.
SinghD. K.2010. Stateless in South Asia: The Chakmas between Bangladesh and India (SAGE Studies on India’s North East). New Delhi: Sage Publications.
