The USA’s advanced capabilities provide it with a significant advantage in generating, capturing, storing, and utilizing big data pools. India’s increasing population combined with ongoing robust digitalization offer not only lucrative market opportunities but also a source of big data pools for US digital corporations. Since the 1990s, India’s IT sector has remained significantly intertwined with the US market by supplying services to US business entities. This interdependence was premised on both states’ tacit espousal to the principle of free cross-border data transfer (CBDT). However, post-2014, India’s espousal to this tacitly agreed-upon principle has gradually shattered. At present, India and the USA hold mutually contradictory positions on CBDT and data localization: the USA supports free CBDT and opposes data localization, while India stands against free CBDT and strongly upholds data localization. In this altered context, this article examines the capabilities, visions, and interests of both India and the USA. It analyzes how these factors influence each state’s policy preferences regarding CBDT and data localization. It also examines how their policy behaviors produce hindrances to achieving an India–USA digital economy strategic partnership. The article argues that, unlike the defense sector, an India–USA digital economy strategic partnership is highly unlikely. Insights from the ‘strategic partnership’ concept and theoretical assumptions of realism are utilized to support this argument.
AtkinsonRobert D.2021. A U.S. Grand Strategy for the Global Digital Economy. Washington:Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. https://itif.org/publications/2021/01/19/us-grand-strategy-global-digital-economy/
2.
Atlantic Council. 2022. The Case for a USA–India Digital Handshake. Washington:Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/US-India_Digital_Economy_Task_Force_The_Case_for_a_Digital_Handshake.pdf
3.
BajpaiKanti. 2008. ‘India and the United States: Grand Strategic Partnership for a Better World’. South Asian Survey15, no. 1: 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152310801500103
4.
BhartiMukesh Shankar. 2023. ‘The Strategic Partnership Between India and the United States of America and How China’s Influence Challenges the India–USA Alliance in the Indo-Pacific Region’. Regional Formation and Development Studies39, no. 1: 16–26. https://doi.org/10.15181/rfds.v36i1.2507
5.
BurgessStephen. 2015. ‘The U.S. Pivot to Asia and Renewal of the U.S.–India Strategic Partnership’. Comparative Strategy34, no. 4: 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2015.1069517
6.
ClaytonJames. March25, 2022a. Europe Agrees New Law to Curb Big Tech Dominance. BBC News. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60870287
7.
ClaytonJames. March5, 2022b. Facebook Hits Out at Russia Blocking Its Platforms. BBC News. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60626777
8.
CoryNigel, and DascoliLuke.2021. How Barriers to Cross-Border Data Flows Are Spreading Globally, What They Cost, and How to Address Them. Washington:Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. https://www2.itif.org/2021-data-localization.pdf
9.
DelivoriusAngelos. 2024. EU India Trade and Technology Council. European Parliamentary Research Service. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2024/757587/EPRS_ATA(2024)757587_EN.pdf
10.
EjazAhmad.2016. ‘United States–India Strategic Partnership: A New Course in the Asian Balance of Power Politics’. Journal of Punjab University Historical Society29, no. 2: 20–28. https://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/HistoryPStudies/PDF-FILES/3-v29_2_16.pdf
11.
GangulySumit, and ScobellAndrew.2005. ‘India and the United States: Forging a Security Partnership?’World Policy Journal22, no. 2: 37–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40209961
12.
GangulySamit, and MasonM. Chris. 2019. An Unnatural Partnership? The Future of USA–India Strategic Cooperation. Carlisle Barracks, PA: USAWC Press. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs
13.
GhoshShona, and KanterJake. January22, 2019. Google Says Data is More Like Sunlight Than Oil, Just 1 Day After Being Fined $57 Million Over Its Privacy and Consent Practices. Business Insider. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.businessinsider.in/google-says-data-is-more-like-sunlight-than-oil-just-1-day-after-being-fined-57-million-over-its-privacy-and-consent-practices/articleshow/67640224.cms
14.
GopalakrishnanKris, GhoshDebjani, VermaNeeta, KatragaddaLalitesh, KumaraguruPonnurangam, SinghParminder Jeet, NarayananKrishnan, and DayasindhuN.2020. Report by the Committee of Experts on Non-Personal Data Governance Framework. New Delhi: Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India.
15.
GoswamiNamrata. 2014. ‘The U.S.–India Strategic Partnership: Compelling Connections?’ In The USA–India Relationship: Cross-sector Collaboration To Promote Sustainable Development. Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep12128.18
16.
GrosseMeghan. 2020. ‘Laying the Foundation for a Commercialized Internet: International Internet Governance in the 1990s’. Internet Histories4, no. 3: 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2020.1769890
17.
GulAzeem, HussainMunawar, ImranSumeera, RehmanAshfaq U., and HaiderSyed Arslan.2021. ‘Assessing Various Opportunities Challenges in India–USA Strategic Partnership’. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues24, no. 1: 1–14. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/assessing-various-opportunities-and-challenges-in-indiaus-strategic-partnership.pdf
18.
GuptaAmit. 2005. The U.S.–India Relationship: Strategic Partnership or Complementary Interests?Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep11879
19.
GuptaShubh, and SonyReeta.2021. ‘Quest of Data Colonialism and Cyber Sovereignty: India’s Strategic Position in Cyberspace’. Legal Issues in the Digital Age2, no. 2: 70–81. https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2021.2.68.81
20.
HaggartBlayne, and TusikovNatasha.2023. The New Knowledge: Information, Data and the Remaking of Global Power, edited by HaggartBlayne and TusikovNatasha.London: Rowman & Littlefield. Accessed January 11, 2024. https://blaynehaggart.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/haggart-tusikov-the-new-knowledge.pdf
21.
KakarAllauddin. 2024. ‘Analyzing India–USA Strategic Partnership and Security Dynamics in South Asia’. Abeseen Review1, no. 1: 1–11. https://www.uoswabi.edu.pk/data/downloads/1956.pdf
KhokharRiaz. 2018. ‘The USA–India Strategic Partnership: Pakistan’s Foreign Policy Response’. Centre for International and Strategic Studies Insight Journal6, no. 1: 23–49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326331130_The_US-India_Strategic_Partnership_Pakistan’s_Foreign_Policy_Response/link/5b46392caca272c609377190/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7InBhZ2UiOiJwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiIsInByZXZpb3VzUGFnZSI6bnVsbH19
24.
KwetMichael. 2019. ‘Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South’. Race and Class60, no. 4: 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172
25.
LadwigWalter C., and MukherjeeAnit.2019. ‘India and the United States: The Contours of an Asian Partnership’. Asia Policy14, no. 1: 3–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/26642261
26.
LangloisRichard N.2019. ‘Hunting the Big Five: Twenty-First Century Antitrust in Historical Perspective’. The Independent Review23, no. 3: 411–433. https://www.independent.org/tir/2018-19-winter/hunting-the-big-five/
27.
LawtonThomas C., MouraStephanie Tonn Goulart, TobinDamian, and Silva-RegoBernando. 2023. ‘Geopolitics of the Data Economy; Implications for States and Firms’. AIB Insights23, no. 2: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.46697/001c.67966
28.
LeonovaOlga, and KhatriJagdish.2023. ‘Strategic Partnership between India and the United States: Examining Driving and Restraining Forces’. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta16, no. 3: 180–198. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-3-90-180-198
29.
LeskinPaige. May24, 2019. Here Are All the Major US Tech Companies Blocked Behind China’s Great Firewall. Business Insider. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.businessinsider.in/here-are-all-the-major-us-tech-companies-blocked-behind-chinas-great-firewall/articleshow/69472924.cms
30.
LibermanPeter. 1996. ‘Trading with the Enemy: Security and Relative Economic Gains’. International Security21, no. 1: 147–175. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2539111.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3A578c55672ee1e34d835239bffbaf581d&ab_segments=&origin=&initiator=&acceptTC=1
31.
LiuPeng. 2016. ‘The Review of India–USA Global Strategic Partnership’. In Annual Report on the Development of the Indian Ocean Region: Modi’s India, edited by WangRong and ZhuCuiping, 143–182. Singapore:Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4693-3
32.
MagalhãesJoão Carlos, and CouldryNick.2021. ‘Giving by Taking Away: Big Tech, Data Colonialism, and the Reconfiguration of Social Good’. International Journal of Communication15, 20. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15995
33.
MannMonique, and DalyAngela.2019. ‘(Big) Data and the North-in-South: Australia’s Informational Imperialism and Digital Colonialism’. Television and New Media20, no. 4: 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418806091
34.
MansorHj Mohd, and SharipMohd.2015. ‘United States–India Strategic Partnership: Implications for Asian Security’. The Journal of Defence and Security5, no. 2: 185–196.
35.
MastandunoMichael.1991. ‘Do Relative Gains Matter? America’s Response to Japanese Industrial Policy’. International Security16, no. 1: 73–113. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/6/article/447274/pdf
36.
MatthanRahul, and RamannShreya.2022. ‘India’s Approach to Data Governance’. In Data Governance: Asian Alternatives: How India and Korea Are Creating New Models and Policies, edited by Evan A. Feigenbaum and Michael R. Nelson, 11–32. Washington:Carnegie Endowment of International Peace.
37.
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. July27, 2022. National Data Governance Framework Policy. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1845318
38.
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, GOI. 2019. India’s Trillion Dollar Digital Opportunity. Government Report. New Delhi:Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. Accessed July 24, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1565669#:~:text=India%20can%20create%20up%20to%20%241%20trillion%20of,growing%20at%20the%20second-fastest%20rate%20amongst%20major%20economies.
39.
Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India. August11, 2023. ‘Digital Personal Data Protection Act’. The Gazette of India, CG-DL-E-12082023-248045 Part II, Section 1 No. 25. New Delhi:Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India.
40.
MitchellAndrew D., and MishraNeha.2019. ‘Regulating Cross-border Data Flow in a Data-driven World: How WTO Can Contribute’. Journal of International Economic Law22, no. 3: 389–416.
41.
NadkarniVidya. 2010. Strategic Partnership in Asia: Balancing Without Alliances. 1st ed.London:Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203865019
42.
NITI Aayog. 2020. Meet the Winners of Atmanirbhar Bharat App Innovate Challenge. 8. https://blog.mygov.in/meet-the-winners-of-aatmanirbhar-bharat-app-innovate-challenge/
43.
O’HaraKieron, and HallWendy.2018. Four Internets: The Geopolitics of Digital Governance. CIGI Papers No. 206 Think Tank Report. WaterlooCenter for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Paper%20no.206web.pdf
44.
O’HaraKieron, and HallWendy.2021. Four Internets; Data Geopolitics and Governance of the Internet. New York:Oxford University Press.
45.
Office of the United States Trade Representative. 2016. Digital-2-Dozen. Washington:Office of the United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-reports/digital-2-dozen
46.
P.Suraksha, and ParbatKalyan.January6, 2023. Reliance Jio, Airtel and Paytm Bat for Personal Data Localisation. ET Telecom. https://telecom.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/reliance-jio-airtel-paytm-bat-for-personal-data-localisation/96778555
47.
PantHarsh V., and JoshiYogesh.2017. ‘Indo–US Relations Under Modi:The Strategic Logic Underlying the Embrace’. International Affairs93, no. 1: 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiw028
48.
ParsheeraSmriti. 2022. ‘What’s Shaping India’s Policy on Cross-border Data Flow’. In Data Governance: Asian Alternatives: How India and Korea Are Creating New Models and Policies, edited by Evan A. Feigenbaum and Michael R. Nelson, 49–70. Washington:Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/08/31/data-governance-asian-alternatives-how-india-and-korea-are-creating-new-models-and-policies-pub-87765
49.
PedroJohn. 2015. ‘United States–India Defense Relations: A Strategic Partnership for the 21st Century’. Cornell International Affairs Review9, no. 1: 23–30. https://doi.org/10.37513/ciar.v9i1.473
50.
PetersonAndrea. October 30 2013. ‘PRISM Already Gave the NSA Access to Tech Giants. Here’s Why It Wanted More’. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2013/10/30/prism-already-gave-the-nsa-access-to-tech-giants-heres-why-it-wanted-more/
51.
PhilipSnehesh Alex. October272020. ‘The 3 Foundational Agreements with USA and What They Mean for India’s Military Growth’. The Print. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://theprint.in/defence/the-3-foundational-agreements-with-us-and-what-they-mean-for-indias-military-growth/531795/
52.
PowersShawn M., and JablonskiMichael.2015. The Real Cyber War; The Political Economy of Internet Freedom. Chicago:Illinois University Press.
53.
PrasadRevati. 2018. ‘Ascendant India, Digital India: How Net Neutrality Advocates Defeated Facebook’s Free Basics’. Media, Culture & Society40, no. 3: 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717736117
54.
RaghavanSharad T.C.A.October11, 2019. ‘India Rejects RCEP E-commerce Chapter’. The Hindu. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://www.thehindu.com/business/india-rejects-rcep-e-commerce-chapter/article29659912.ece
55.
RashidSawaira. 2023. ‘Emerging United States–India Strategic Partnership: Implications for Pakistan’. Journal of Development and Social Sciences4, no. III: 329–341. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-iii)33
56.
RenaudJean-Luc. 1986. ‘A Conceptual Framework for the Examination of Transborder Data Flows’. The Information Society4, no. 3: 145–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01972243.1986.9960028
57.
RosenbachEric, and ManstedKatherine.2019. The Geopolitics of InformationCambridge:Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/geopolitics-information
58.
RoyPrasanto K.March5, 2019. ‘The Trouble with Data Nationalism’. India Today. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/up-front/story/20190311-the-trouble-with-data-nationalism-1467425-2019-03-05
59.
ShahzadFaisal. 2023. ‘The Indo–US Strategic Partnership: An Analysis of the Trump Era’. Journalism, Politics and Society1, no. 4: 231–44. https://doi.org/10.63067/exv0da34
60.
ShengLi. 2022. Contributions to International Relations: The Role of the Nation-State in New Forms of Power. 1st ed.Vol. 1. Singapore:Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3682-1
61.
ShermanJustin. 2022. Trading in USA–India Data Flows: Prospects for Cooperation in USA–India Data Policy. Washington:Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Cross_Border_Data_Flows.pdf
62.
Silicon India. June28, 2022. India and the US to Form a Digital Partnership. Accessed July 19, 2024. https://www.siliconindia.com/news/usindians/india-and-the-us-to-form-a-digital-partnership-nid-219346-cid-49.html
63.
SinghSinderpal. 2019. ‘The Indo-Pacific and India–U.S. Strategic Convergence’. Asia Policy14, no. 1: 77–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/26642264
64.
SinghAbhijit, PandeAparna, SmithJeff M., SaranSamir, JoshiSunjoy, and LohmanWalter.2018. The New India–USA Partnership in the Indo-Pacific: Peace, Prosperity and Security. New Delhi:Observer Research Foundation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332752374_The_new_India-US_partnership_in_the_Indo-Pacific_Peace_prosperity_and_security
65.
SlaughterMatthew J., and McCormickDavid H.April16, 2021. ‘Data is Power: Washington Needs to Craft New Rules for the Digital Age’. Foreign Affairs. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-04-16/data-power-new-rules-digital-age
66.
SnidalDuncan. 1991. ‘International Cooperation Among Relative Gains Maximizers’. International Studies Quarterly35, no. 4: 387–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600947
67.
SrikrishnaB. N., SundararajanAruna, PandeyAjay Bhusan, KumarAjay, MoonaRajat, RaiGulshan, KrishnanRishikesha, SenguptaArghya, and VedashreeRama.2017. White Paper of the Committee of Experts on a Data Protection Framework for IndiaNew Delhi:Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/a-free-and-fair-digital-economy-protecting-privacy-empowering-indians/
68.
Statista. March, 2024. Leading Countries by Number of Data Centers as of March 2024. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1228433/data-centers-worldwide-by-country/
69.
StreinzThomas. 2016. ‘Digital Megaregulation Uncontested? TPP’s Model for the Global Digital Economy’. In Megaregulation Contested: Global Economic Ordering After TPP, edited by KingsburyBenedict, MaloneDavid M., MertenskotterPaul, StewartRichard B., StreinzThomas, and SunamiAtsushi, 312–342. New York:Oxford University Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3784503
70.
TahirAima, and EjazKhushboo.2020. ‘India–United States Strategic Partnership in Indian Ocean Region and Its Implications for Pakistan’. Journal of Indian Studies6, no. 1: 7–24. https://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/indianStudies/PDF/1_v6_1_20.pdf#:~:text=Pakistan%20being%20the%20third%20largest%20littoral%20state%20of%2Csubmarines%20and%20balance%20of%20power%20in%20the%20region
71.
TanChunlei, PlasekJoseph M., ZhuYangyong, and HuangYajun.2020. ‘Data Sovereigns for the World Economy’. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications7, no. 184: 1–4.
72.
TaylorPetroc. 2023. Volume of Data/Information Created, Captured, Copied, and Consumed Worldwide from 2010 to 2020, with Forecasts from 2021 to 2025. New York:Statista. Accessed July 24, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/871513/worldwide-data-created/
73.
ThatcherJim, O’SullivanDavid, and MahmoudiDillon.2016. ‘Data Colonialism through Accumulation by Dispossession: New Metaphors for Daily Data’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space34, no. 6: 990–1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816633195
74.
The Economic Times. August1, 2019. ‘Mukesh Ambani Urges PM to Take Steps Against Data Colonisation’. The Economic Times. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/ites/mukesh-ambani-urges-pm-to-take-steps-against-data-colonisation/articleshow/67585615.cms
75.
The Economist. June5, 2017. ‘Data is Giving Rise to a New Economy’. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/briefing/2017/05/06/data-is-giving-rise-to-a-new-economy
76.
The Economist. February20, 2020. ‘The EU Wants to Set the Rules for the World of Technology’. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/business/2020/02/20/the-eu-wants-to-set-the-rules-for-the-world-of-technology
77.
The European Council. June29, 2018. EU to Ban Data Localisation Restrictions as Ambassadors Approve Deal on Free Flow of Data. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/06/29/eu-to-ban-data-localisation-restrictions-as-ambassadors-approve-deal-on-free-flow-of-data/
78.
The White House. 2022. National Security Strategy. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/8-November-Combined-PDF-for-Upload.pdf
79.
The White House. June22, 2023. Joint Statement from the United States and India. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/06/22/joint-statement-from-the-united-states-and-india/
80.
The White House. June17, 2024. Joint Fact Sheet: The United States and India Continue to Chart an Ambitious Course for the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/06/17/joint-fact-sheet-the-united-states-and-india-continue-to-chart-an-ambitious-course-for-the-initiative-on-critical-and-emerging-technology/
81.
ThomasPradip Ninan. 2019. The Politics of Digital India, edited by AthiqueAdrian, ParthasarathiVibodh, and SrinivasS. V.1st ed.New Delhi:Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199494620.001.0001
82.
TyushkaAndriy, and CzechowskaLucyna.2020. ‘Strategic Partnerships, International Politics and IR Theory’. In States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships, edited by CzechowskaLucyna, TyushkaAndriy, DomachowskaAgata, Gawron-TaborKarolina, and Piechowiak-LampraskaJoanna, 8–43. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972284.00010
83.
United States Senate. 2023. Letter to the US President from Senators. Washington:United States Senate. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/20231130wydencrapolettertopotusonwto-digitaltradenegotiations.pdf
84.
UrbanKonstantin, and KurowskaXymena.2021. The Clouds of a Bloodless War: Data Localisation and the Securitization of Cyberspace in India. Vienna:Central European University.
85.
US Department of State. June2021. USA–EU Trade and Technology Council. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://2021-2025.state.gov/u-s-eu-trade-and-technology-council-ttc/
86.
Van DijckJose. 2014. ‘Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology’. Surveillance and Society12, no. 2: 197–208. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/datafication/datafic
87.
Verma LalPreeti. 2022. 75 Start-ups That are Firming Up India’s Position in the Global Digital Economy. moneycontrol. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/startup/75-start-ups-that-are-firming-up-indias-position-in-the-global-digital-economy-9026241.html#goog_rewarded
88.
VijayalakshmiK. P.2015. ‘India and USA: A New Moment in Strategic Partnership’. Foreign Affairs Journal10, no. 2: 133–139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45341026
89.
VijayalakshmiK. P.2017. ‘India–USA Strategic Partnership: Shifting American Perspectives on Engaging India’. International Studies54, no. 1–4: 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881718791403
90.
Vila SeoaneMaximiliano Facundo.2021. ‘Data Securitisation: The Challenges of Data Sovereignty in India’. Third World Quarterly42, no. 8: 1733–1750. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1915122
91.
ZajączkowskiJakub. 2021. ‘The United States in India’s Strategy in the Indo-Pacific Region Since 2014’. Polish Political Science Yearbook50, no. 4: 107–130. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202158
