The Neglect to Income from Work in the Capabilities Approach: A Critique

Abstract

View all access options for this article.

Banerjee

(2005), “Social work, Rawlsian social justice, and social development”, Social Development Issues, 27 (1), 6–24.

Bhatt

(2006), We are Poor but So Many, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Census of India, http://www.censusindia.gov.in. Retrieved 10/28/07.

Government of West Bengal (2004), West Bengal Human Development Report, Development and Planning Department: Government of West Bengal.

Narayan-Parker

, Chambers

Shah

, Petesch

(2000), Voices of the Poor: Crying out for Change, New York, NY: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.

Nussbaurm

(2001), Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Rawls

(2001), Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Rawls

(1999), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rawls

(1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

10.

Robeyns

(2005), “The capabilities approach: A theoretical survey”, Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114.

11.

Sen

(1999), Developments as Freedom, New York, NY: Anchor Books.

12.

Sen

(1997), “From income inequality to economic inequality”, Distinguished Guest Lecture, Southern Economic Journal, 64(2), 384–401.

13.

Stiglitz

(2006), Making Globalization Work, London, England: Penguin Books.

14.

“4 of world's richest are Indians”, The Times of India, March 2008, Page 1, Times News Network, Calcutta Times: Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd.

15.

United Nations Development Programme (2006), Human Development Report: India.