RawlsJohn, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971, at 22.
2.
BenthamJ., ‘Anarchical Fallacies’, in BowringJ. (Ed), The Works of jeremy Bentham Vol II, Edinburgh, William Tait, 1843, at 491 ff.
3.
HartH.L.A., Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1983, at 186.
4.
5.
For Bentham; ‘Rights are the fruits of the law and of the law alone; there are no rights without law – no rights contrary to law – no rights anterior to the law …’ [HartH.L.A., Essays on Bentham, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1982, at 82, quoting Bentham.]
6.
7.
8.
HartH.L.A., Essays on Bentham, op. cit., at 91.
9.
LyonsDavid, ‘Utility and Rights’, in WaldronJ. (Ed), Theories of Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984, 110-136, at 134.
10.
See, for example, his following works: Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1965; Ethics and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984; ‘Rights, Claimants, and Beneficaries’, and ‘Human Rights and General Welfare’, in LyonsD. (Ed), Rights, Belmont, Calif., Wadsworth Publishing Co., 58-77 and 174-86 respectively; ‘On Sanctioning Excuses’ (1969) 66 Journal of Philosophy 646; ‘On Formal Justice’ (1973) 58 Cornell Law Review 58.
11.
BarrowR., Utilitarianism: A Contemporary Statement, Aldershot, Edward Elgar Ltd., 1991, at 122, n. 10.
12.
LyonsDavid, ‘Utility and Rights’, in WaldronJ. (Ed), Theories of Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984, 110-136.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Taking Rights Seriously, London, Gerald Duckworth & Co, 1978 (new impression) 1st pub. 1977, A Matter of Principle, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1985, Law’s Empire, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press & London, Fontana Press, 1986. Dworkin’s theory is discussed infra.
23.
GablePeter, ‘Book Review, Taking Rights Seriously’, (1977–78) 91 Harvard Law Review 302, at 315.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
SparerEd, ‘Fundamental Human Rights, Legal Entitlements, and the Social Struggle: A Friendly Critique of the Critical Legal Studies Movement’ (1983–1984) 36 Stanford Law Review 509, at 530.
35.
KennedyDuncan, ‘Critical Labor Law Theory; A Comment’ (1981) 4 Industrial Relations Law Journal 503, at 506.
36.
‘Communal Rights’ (1984) 62 Texas Law Review 1417, at 1419.
37.
SparerEd, op. cit., at 512.
38.
A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971. For an encapsulated account of Rawls’ theory see for example, Dr Imtiaz Omar, Towards a Meaningful Discourse on Rights in Australia’ (1996)2 Newcastle Law Review 15, at 32.
39.
40.
41.
42.
DworkinRonald, ‘The Original Position’, in DanielsN.(Ed), Reading Rawls, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1975, 16-53, at 45.
43.
44.
Taking Rights Seriously, London, Gerald Duckworth & Co., 1978 (new impression) 1st pub. 1977, at 138.
45.
46.
47.
Inking Rights Seriously, at 139.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
Constitution of India, Part III, Articles 12-35.
65.
Constitution of India, Articles 14-18.
66.
Constitution of India, Article 19.
67.
Constitution of India, Article 21.
68.
Constitution of India, Articles 25-28.
69.
Constitution of India, Articles 31, 31 A, 31B, and 31C
