AllenDavid, ‘EPC/CFSP, the Soviet Union, and the
Former Soviet Republics: Do the Twelve Have a Coherent
Policy?’, in RegelsbergerE. et al. (eds), Foreign Policy of the European Union From
EPC to CFSP and Beyond, London;
Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner,
1997, pp.
220–221.
2.
FraserP., ‘Russia, the CIS and the European
Community : Building a Relationship’, in
MalcolmNeil (ed.), Russia and Europe : An End to
Confrontation?, London, Pinter,
1994, p. 200.
3.
Ibid., pp.
201–202.
4.
Ibid, p.
208.
5.
Allen, op. cit., n.
1, pp.
230–231.
6.
Fraser, op. cit., n.
2, pp.
209–210.
7.
HillionChristophe, ‘Institutional Aspects of the Partnership
between the European Union and the Newly Independent States of the Former
Soviet Union: Case Studies on Russia and Ukraine’,
Common Market Law Review, Vol. 37,
2000, p. 1215.
8.
Fraser, op. cit, n.
2, pp.
216–217.
9.
DinanDesmond, Ever Closer Union? An Introduction to European
Integration, London,
Macmillan, 1999, p.
494.
10.
Hillion, op. cit., n.
7, p. 1221.
11.
Downloaded from the official website of the
EU Council of Ministers athttp://ue.eu.int on
5June, 2001.
Downloaded from the official website of the
European Parliament athttp://www.europarl.eu.int on 30May, 2001.
14.
VahlM., Just Good Friends? The EU-Russian “Strategic
Partnership” and the Northern Dimension,
Centre for European Policy Studies,
Brussels, 2001, p.
8.
15.
Cited in Vahl, ibid., p.
8 (footnote n. 25); HaukkalaHiski, ‘The Making Of the European
Union’s Common Strategy on Russia’, in
HaukkalaHiskiMedvedevSergei (eds), The EU Common Strategy on Russia Learning the
Grammer of the CFSP, The Finnish Institute of
International Affairs and Institut fur Europaische Politik,
Helsinki/Berlin, 2001, p.
28.
16.
Haukkala, ibid., pp.
41–42.
17.
Commission of the European
Communities, The European Union and Russia: the Future
Relationship, COM (95) 223 final,
Brussels, 31May, 1995, pp.
1–2.
18.
Ibid., p.
6.
19.
Ibid, p.
8.
20.
Ibid.
21.
Ibid, p.
9.
22.
Ibid, p.
14.
23.
Haukkala, op. cit, n.
15, p. 28.
24.
Haukkala, op. cit, n.
15, p. 30.
25.
Haukkala, op. cit, n.
15, pp.
30–31.
26.
Downloaded from the official website of the
EU Council of Ministers athttp://ue.eu.int on 11April, 2001.
27.
Haukkala, op.cit, n.
15, p. 31.
28.
Downloaded from the official EU website
athttp://europa.eu.int on 9April, 2001.
29.
European Parliament, Report on The
Commission communication entitled‘The Future of Relations between the European Union and
Russia’ and the Action Plan
‘The European Union and Russia: the future
relationship’ COM(95)223 final, (Lalumiere
Report), Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and
Defence Policy, 12February1998.
30.
Haukkala, op. cit, n.
15.
31.
Based on the interviews withSouranderDagMr., Administrator, Foreign Affairs Committee,
European Parliament; and WorseleyMr. RoyBodenMr. Tim, Foreign Press section,
European Parliament, both in
Brussels, late March,
2001.
For details, see GinsbergRoy H., Foreign Policy Actions of the European Community The
Politics of Scale, London;
Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner,
1989.
36.
One of the cardinal legal principles
governing the EC/EU which determines whether a particular matter not
belonging to the area of exclusive competence of either the EC/EU should be
dealt with at the EC/EU level or be left to national practices. The Treaty
of Amsterdam (1997) brought the area of Common Foreign and Security Policy
(CFSP) under the regulation of this principle. For detailed legal
analysis, see KapteynP.J.G.VerlorenT.V., Introduction to the Law of the European
Communities, London, Kluwer, 1998; KeefeD.O.TwomeyP. (eds), Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty,
Chichester, Wiley
Chancery, 1994.
37.
The term ‘capacity’ is used
here to mean the objective inputs to the making of a Common European Foreign
Policy – institutions, resources, specific instruments and
procedures. For details, see SanyalJoyobroto, Foreign Policy-Making Beyond the State: The Making of a
Common European Foreign Policy, Unpublished PhilM., dissertation, University of
Cambridge, 2001.
38.
The term ‘capability’ is used
here to mean the subjective inputs to the making of a Common European
Foreign Policy under the EU’s CFSP – the political will of the
decision-making actors and latters’ inclination towards the use of
the EU’s ‘capacity’ under the CFSP so that more
effective decisions can be made. For details, see SanyalJoyobroto, ibid.
39.
Hillion, op. cit., n.
7, pp.
1223–1229.
40.
Downloaded from the official EU website, op.
cit., inApril, 2001.
41.
Haukkala, op. cit., n.
15, p. 59; European
Commission’s communication, op. cit., n. 17,
p. 8
