For a brief review of literature on military intervention, see, KaldorMary, ‘The Military in Third World Development’, World Development (Vol. 4, no. 6, June, 1976), pp. 460–464; See, also, BasuGautam Kumar, The State, Development and Military Interventions (New Delhi; South Asian Publishers, 1991) pp. 7–21; LinzJuanStepanAlfred, The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978).
2.
HandelmanH. et al., Military Government and the Movement towards Democracy in South America (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1981).
3.
O’DonnellGuillermo et al., (eds.), Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).
4.
HuntingtonSamuel, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: Oklahama University Press, 1991).
5.
GilpinRobert, The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), Chap. 1.
6.
NagleBothreferMahr to David Held’s concept of ‘Cosmopolitan Democracy’ in this context without resorting to any in-depth analysis. For the concept of cosmopolitan democracy, see, HeldDavid‘Democracy: From City State to a Cosmopolitan Order?’ In HeldDavid (ed), Prospects for Democracy: North, South, East, West (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993), pp 13–73. See also HeldDavid, ‘The Transformation of Political Community: rethinking democracy in the context of globalization’, in ShapiroIanCasianoHacker-Cordon (eds.) Democracy’s Edges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) pp. 88–111. See also KymlickaWill, ‘Citizenship in an era of Globalization: Commentary on Held’, and ‘Alexander Wendt, A comment on Held’s Cosmopolitanism’, in ibid., pp. 112–126 and pp. 127–133 respectively.
7.
GramsciAntonio, Selection from Prison Note Books (New York: International Publishers, 1971), p. 244. (ed. by HoareQuintinNowellGeoffray Smith).
8.
AshleyRichard‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization (vol. 38 no. 2, Spring, 1984), p. 73, and p. 77.
9.
NagleJohn D.MahrAlison, Democracy and Democratization: Post-Communist Europe in Comparative Perspective (London: Sage Publication, 1999), p. 3.
10.
citaitations are from various pages of ibid.
11.
FukuyamaFrancis, ‘The End of History’, The National Interest, (No. 16, Summer, 1989), pp. 3–18; The End of History and the Last man (London; Penguin Books, 1992).
12.
NagleJohn D.MahrAllison, op. cit., p. 13.
13.
ibid., p. 286.
14.
MacphersonC.B., The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).
15.
Citations are from various pages ofNagleJohn D.MahrAlison, op. cit.,
16.
See, for exampleBasuGautam Kumar, ‘The Question of State – Autonomy and Regime Transformation in the Third World’, Asian Studies (vol. 10, 1992), pp. 6–28; GillStephen, ‘Globalization, Market Civilization and Disciplinary Neolibralism, Millennium (vol. 24, No. 3, Winter, 1995), pp. 399 – 423. BasuGautam Kumar, ‘Liberalization and Democracy in India: Problems and Prospects’, in Dutta-GuptaSobhon Lal (ed.), India: Politics and Society – Today and Tomorrow (Calcutta: K.P. Bagchi & Company, 1998), pp. 27–44. SamaddarRanabir, ‘Reforms, Democracy and Justice: Some Issues of State and the Market in South Asia’, in AhmedhntiazGhoshPartha S.ReifieldHelmut (eds.), Pluralism and Equality: Value in Indian Society and Politics (New Delhi: Sage Publication, 2000), pp. 219–238;
17.
NagleJohn D.MahrAlison, op. cit., p. 266.
18.
ibid., p. 64.
19.
ibid,. p. 65.
20.
GramsciAntonio. op. cit., p. 12.
21.
See, FoucaultMichael, ‘Govemmentality’, in BurchellG.GordonC.MillerP. (eds.), The Foucault Effects: Studies in Govemmentality, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991) pp. 87–104.
22.
MarxKailEnqelsFredrich, Manifesto of the Communist Party (Mosco: Progress Publishers, 1973 Printing), pp. 44–45.
23.
NagleJohn D.MahrAlsion, op. cit., p. 71.
24.
MarxKarlEngelsFredrich, op. cit., pp. 57–58.
25.
BasuKaushik, Prelude to Political Economy: A Study of the Social and Political Foundations of Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 144
26.
ibid., p. 161.
27.
ibid, p. 118.
28.
ibid., P. 143.
29.
NagleJohn D.MahrAlison, op. cit., p. 65.
30.
GramsciAntonio, op. cit., p. 160.
31.
Utilitarianism does not necessarily mean hedonistic utilitarianism, but embraces the concept of welfare as well. See, GoodinRobert E., ‘Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy’ in VincentAndrew (ed.) Political Theory: tradition and diversity (Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 1997). pp. 67–68.
32.
See, BasuGautam Kumar (1992), op. cit., pp. 15–16.
33.
NagleJohn D.MahrAlison, op. cit., p. 282
34.
GramsciAntonio, op. cit., p. 3
35.
ibid., p. 330.
36.
ibid., P. 332.
37.
ibid., p. 328.
38.
ibid., p. 328.
39.
NagleJohn D.MahrAlison, op. cit., p. 122.
40.
ibid., p. 194.
41.
ibid., p. 199.
42.
PanitchLeo (ed.), Socialist Register1997 (Suffolk: The Merlin Press, 1997), p. 2.
43.
GramsciAntonio, op. cit., p. 167.
44.
PanitchLeo (ed.), op. cit., p. 3.
45.
NagleJohn D.MahrAlison, op. cit., p. 3.
46.
Personal Letter fromNagpleJohn D. to the Author.
47.
GramsciAntonie, op. cit., p. 326.
48.
ibid., p. 135.
49.
Cited in DerridaJacques, Politics of Friendship (London:, Verso, 1997), p. 300.
50.
This is the subtitle of a book by John D. Nagle, Confession from the Left: On the Pain, Necessity and Joys of Political Renewal (New York: Peter Lang, 1998). One can easily notice that the sublitle of this paper is also borrowed from this same book with slight modification. The feet is: I have written this paper with no joy in my heart – after all, John had a lot of things to say. But unfortunately – he was silenced by a force which no one can resist. This, however, does not prevent me from anticipating the ultimate joys of political renewal. Power, inequality, injustice, marginalisation, oppression can be the last word in a world dominated by the lumpens. But human history has always been written by those who read, write, inquire, observe, interpret and make conscious effort to change the world. Lumpens are thrown into the dustbin of history.