Exploring the Influence of Digital Games on Environmental Attitudes and Behaviours Based on the New Ecological Paradigm Scale: A Mixed-Methods Study in India

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities cause environmental degradation-related problems. However, people fail to perform pro-environmental behaviours because they believe that they cannot make a difference or they focus on short-term benefits. Interventions that address specific target groups aimed at breaking barriers and changing behaviours are required. To teach young learners, environmental education using digital games can be a more effective instructional method. This mixed-methods study, conducted among high school students in India, examined differences in pro-environmental attitudes and behaviours between students who played a game called EnerCities and those students who did not play that game. Significant differences existed between the two groups considering the unidimensional and multi-dimensional properties of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) scale. Thematic analysis with an inductive approach identified from the interview data: How EnerCities changed participants’ environmental attitudes? This study finds implications for implementing games and using the NEP to examine environmental attitudes of high school students in India.

Keywords

Digital games environmental sustainability education pro-environmental attitudes and behaviours New Ecological Paradigm scale mixed-methods study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarts

, & Dijksterhuis

(2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 53–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.53

Ajzen

(2019). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf

AlMenhali

E. A.

, Khalid

, & Iyanna

(2018). Testing the psychometric properties of the Environmental Attitudes Inventory on undergraduate students in the Arab context: A test-retest approach. PloS One, 13(5), Article e0195250.

Amburgey

J. W.

, & Thoman

D. B.

(2012). Dimensionality of the new ecological paradigm: Issues of factor structure and measurement. Environment and Behaviour, 44(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402064

Arbuthnott

K. D.

(2009). Education for sustainable development beyond attitude change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910945954

Ballantyne

, & Packer

(2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behaviour through free-choice learning experiences: what is the state of the game?. Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 281–295.

Bell

D. V. J.

(2016). Twenty-first century education: Transformative education for sustainability and responsible citizenship. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0004

Borunda

(2019, August 29). See how much of the Amazon is burning, how it compares to other years. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/08/amazon-fires-cause-deforestation-graphic-map/#close

Bralower

T. J.

, Feiss

P. G.

, & Manduca

C. A.

(2008). Preparing a new generation of citizens and scientists to face earth’s future. Liberal Education, 94(2), 20–23.

10.

Braun

, & Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

11.

Butler

(1988). Games and simulations: Creative education alternatives. TechTrends, 33(4), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02771190

12.

Carew

A. L.

, & Mitchell

C. A.

(2008). Teaching sustainability as a contested concept: Capitalizing on variation in engineering educators’ conceptions of environmental, social, and economic sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.11.004

13.

Climate-ADAPT (2020). https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/knowledge/adaptation-information/research-projects

14.

Cordano

, Welcomer

S. A.

, & Scherer

R. F.

(2003). An analysis of the predictive validity of the new ecological paradigm scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(3), 22–28.

15.

Creswell

J. W.

, & Plano Clark

V. L.

(2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.

16.

Cuccurullo

, Francese

, Passero

, & Tortora

(2013). A 3D serious city building game on waste disposal. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 11(4), 112–135.

17.

Daly

(2019). No, koalas aren’t ‘functionally extinct’-yet. National geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/2019/11/koalas-near-extinction-myth-australia-fires/

18.

Davis

(2019). 7 climate change projects that are changing the game. Retrieved from https://bigthink.com/technology-innovation/climate-change-projects

19.

Denzin

(1970). An introduction to triangulation. UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Fundamentals. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/sub_landing/files/10_4-Intro-to-triangulation-MEF.pdf

20.

Denzin

N. K.

(1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

21.

Denzin

N. K.

(2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.

22.

Dunlap

R. E.

(2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 3–18.

23.

Dunlap

R. E.

, Gallup

G. H.

Jr. , & Gallup

A. M.

(1993). Of global concern: Results of the health of the planet survey. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 35(9), 7–39.

24.

Dunlap

R. E.

, & Van Liere

K. D.

(1978). The ‘new environmental paradigm’. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19.

25.

Dunlap

R. E.

, Van Liere

K. D.

, Mertig

A. G.

, & Jones

R. E.

(2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes—Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.

26.

Erickson

(2012). Qualitative research methods for science education. Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1451–1469). Springer.

27.

Evans

G. W.

, Brauchle

, Haq

, Stecker

, Wong

, & Shapiro

(2007). Young children’s environmental attitudes and behaviours. Environment and Behaviour, 39(5), 645–659.

28.

Fabricatore

, & López

(2012). Sustainability learning through gaming: An exploratory study. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(2), 209–222.

29.

Fielding

K. S.

, & Head

B. W.

(2012). Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: The role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge, and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.592936

30.

Fielding

K. S.

, McDonald

, & Louis

W. R.

(2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity, and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003

31.

Fleury-Bahi

, Marcouyeux

, Renard

, & Roussiau

(2015). Factorial structure of the New Ecological Paradigm scale in two French samples. Environmental Education Research, 21(6), 821–831.

32.

Gardner

G. T.

, & Stern

P. C.

(2002). Environmental problems and human behaviour (2nd ed.) Pearson Custom Publishing.

33.

Gee

J. P.

(2008). Game-like learning: An example of situated learning and implications for opportunity to learn. Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 200–221). Cambridge University Press.

34.

Guerra

(2017). Integration of sustainability in engineering education: Why is PBL an answer? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(3), 436–454.

35.

Harker-Schuch

I. E.

, Mills

F. P.

, Lade

S. J.

, & Colvin

R. M.

(2020). CO2peration – Structuring a 3D interactive digital game to improve climate literacy in the 12-13-year-old age group. Computers & Education, 144, 103705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103705

36.

Harraway

, Broughton

, Deaker

, Jowett

, & Shephard

(2012). Exploring the use of the revised New Ecological Paradigm Scale (NEP) to monitor the development of students’ ecological worldviews. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.634450

37.

Hawcroft

L. J.

, & Milfont

T. L.

(2010). The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 143–158.

38.

Hungerford

H. R.

, & Volk

T. L.

(1990). Changing learner behaviour through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.

39.

Janakiraman

, Watson

S. L.

, & Watson

W. R.

(2018). Using game-based learning to facilitate attitude change for environmental sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 12(2), 176–185.

40.

Janakiraman

, Watson

S. L.

, Watson

W. R.

, & Cheng

(2021a). Creating environmentally conscious engineering professionals through attitudinal instruction: A mixed methods study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, Article 125957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125957

41.

Janakiraman

, Watson

S. L.

, Watson

W. R.

, & Newby

(2021b). Effectiveness of digital games in producing environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviors: A mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 160, Article 104043.

42.

Jowett

, Harraway

, Lovelock

, Skeaff

, Slooten

, Strack

, & Shephard

(2014). Multinomial-regression modeling of the environmental attitudes of higher education students based on the revised new ecological paradigm scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(1), 1–15.

43.

Kafková

(2019). Environmental attitudes in an intergenerational perspective. Slovenský národopis, 67(2), 201–215.

44.

Karl

T. R.

, & Trenberth

K. E.

(2003). Modern global climate change. Science, 302(5651), 1719–1723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090228

45.

Katsaliaki

, & Mustafee

(2015). Edutainment for sustainable development: A survey of games in the field. Simulation & Gaming, 46(6), 647–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114552166

46.

Khan

, Khan

M. N.

, & Adil

(2012). Exploring the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) scale in India: Item analysis, factor structure and refinement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 8(4), 389–397.

47.

Knol

, & de Vries

P. W.

(2010). EnerCities: Educational game about energy. http://www.qeam.com/docs/Knol_Vries_de_EnerCities-educational-game-about-energy-CESB10.PDF

48.

Knol

, & de Vries

P. W.

(2011). EnerCities, a serious game to stimulate sustainability and energy conservation: Preliminary results. eLearning Papers, 25, 1–10. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1866206

49.

Kollmuss

, & Agyeman

(2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

50.

Kopnina

H. N.

(2011). Applying the new ecological paradigm scale in the case of environmental education: Qualitative analysis of the ecological world view of Dutch children. Journal of Peace Education and Social Justice, 5(3), 374–388.

51.

Levy

D. L.

(1997). Business and international environmental treaties: Ozone depletion and climate change. California Management Review, 39(3), 54–71.

52.

Liarakou

, Sakka

, Gavrilakis

, & Tsolakidis

(2012). Evaluation of serious games, as a tool for education for sustainable development. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 15(2).

53.

Lincoln

Y. S.

, & Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

54.

Manoli

C. C.

, Johnson

, & Dunlap

R. E.

(2007). Assessing children’s environmental worldviews: Modifying and validating the New Ecological Paradigm scale for use with children. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(4), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.4.3–13

55.

Merriam

S. B.

, & Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

56.

Miles

M. B.

, & Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publications.

57.

Montzka

S. A.

, Butler

J. H.

, Elkins

J. W.

, Thompson

T. M.

, Clarke

A. D.

, & Lock

L. T.

(1999). Present and future trends in the atmospheric burden of ozone-depleting halogens. Nature, 398(6729), 690–694.

58.

National Research Council (2011). Climate stabilization targets: Emissions, concentrations, and impacts over decades to millennia. National Academies Press.

59.

Newman

P. A.

, Oman

L. D.

, Douglass

A. R.

, Fleming

E. L.

, Firth

S. M.

, Hurwitz

M. M.

, Kawa

S. R.

, Jackman

C. H.

, Krutov

N. A.

, Nash

E. R.

, Nielsen

J. E.

, Pawson

, Solaria

R. S.

, & Velders

G. J. M.

(2009). What would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated? Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 9(6), 2113–2128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2113-2009

60.

Nickerson

R. S.

(2003). Psychology and environmental change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

61.

Nordby

, Øygardslia

, Sverdrup

, & Sverdrup

(2016). The art of gamification: Teaching sustainability and system thinking by pervasive game development. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), 152–168.

62.

Ouariachi

, Olvera-Lobo

M. D.

, Gutiérrez-Pérez

, & Maibach

(2019). A framework for climate change engagement through video games. Environmental Education Research, 25(5), 701–716.

63.

Ouellette

J. A.

, & Wood

(1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behaviour predicts future behaviour. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54

64.

Packer

(2009). Service learning in a non-majors biology course promotes changes in students’ attitudes and values about the environment. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030117.

65.

Page

, & Page

(2014). Climate change: Time to do something different. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1294.

66.

Pauw

J. B.-D.

, Donche

, & Van Petegem

(2011). Adolescents’ environmental worldview and personality: An explorative study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(2), 109–117.

67.

Pauw

J. B.-D.

, & Van Petegem

(2012). Cultural differences in the environmental worldview of children. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 2(1), 1–11.

68.

Plano Clark

V. L.

, Schumacher

, West

, Edrington

, Dunn

L. B.

, Harzstark

, Melisko

, Rabow

M. W.

, Swift

P. S.

, & Miaskowski

(2013). Practices for embedding an interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 219–242.

69.

Prensky

(2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596

70.

Rooney

, McCann

, Gellner

, & Moore

J. C.

(2006). Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature, 442(7100), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04887

71.

Root

T. L.

, Price

J. T.

, Hall

K. R.

, Schneider

S. H.

, Rosenzweig

, & Pounds

J. A.

(2005). The impact of climatic change on wild animals and plants: A meta-analysis. In Ralph

, John

, & Terrell

(Eds.), Bird conservation implementation and integration in the Americas [Conference Proceedings], Third International Partners in Flight Conference, 2002, March 20–24; [Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191, Vol. 2]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, pp. 1115–1118. https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr191/psw_gtr191_1115-1118_root.pdf

72.

Segalàs

, Ferrer-Balas

, Svanström

, Lundqvist

, & Mulder

K. F.

(2009). What has to be learnt for sustainability? A comparison of bachelor engineering education competences at three European universities. Sustainability Science, 4(1), 17.

73.

Shephard

, Mann

, Smith

, & Deaker

(2009). Benchmarking the environmental values and attitudes of students in New Zealand’s post-compulsory education. Environmental Education Research, 15, 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903050523

74.

Stern

P. C.

(2011). Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 303.

75.

Stevenson

R. B.

(2007). Schooling and environmental/sustainability education: From discourses of policy and practice to discourses of professional learning. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 265–285.

76.

Swim

, Clayton

, Doherty

, Gifford

, Howard

, Reser

, Stern

, & Weber

(2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges: A report of the American Psychological Association’s task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change. American Psychological Association.

77.

Tan

, & Biswas

(2007). Simulation-based game learning environments: Building and sustaining a fish tank. IEEE Xplore Digital Library, 73-80. Doi:10.1109/DIGITEL.2007.44.

78.

The Paris Agreement (2015). https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs

79.

Tucker

(1999). A survey of attitudes and barriers to kerbside recycling. Environmental and Waste Management, 2(1), 55–63.

80.

UNESCO (n.d.-a). Education 2030. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/santiago/education-2030/

81.

UNESCO (n.d.-b). Education for sustainable development. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development/what-is-esd

82.

United Nations Climate Summit (2019). https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/un-climate-summit-2019.shtml

83.

USAID. (n.d). https://www.climatelinks.org/projects.

84.

Van der Linden

, Maibach

, & Leiserowitz

(2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five ‘best practice’ insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 758–763.

85.

Van Petegem

, & Blieck

(2006). The environmental worldview of children: A cross-cultural perspective. Environmental Education Research, 12(5), 625–635.

86.

Velders

G. J.

, Andersen

S. O.

, Daniel

J. S.

, Fahey

D. W.

, & McFarland

(2007). The importance of the Montreal Protocol in protecting climate [Conference session]. National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(12), 4814–4819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610328104

87.

Webb

T. L.

, & Sheeran

(2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249

88.

Weber

E. U.

(2006). Evidence-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3

89.

Wells

, & Petherick

(2016, December). New Ecological Paradigm and sustainability attitudes with respect to a multi-cultural educational milieu in China [Conference session]. International Conferences on Internet Technologies & Society (ITS), Education Technologies (ICEduTECH), and Sustainability, Technology and Education (STE), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 311–316. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED571565.pdf

90.

Wiernik

B. M.

, Ones

D. S.

, & Dilchert

(2013). Age and environmental sustainability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(7), 826–856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-07–2013-0221

91.

Williamson

, Satre-Meloy

, Velasco

, & Green

(2018). Climate change needs behaviour change: Making the case for behavioural solutions to reduce global warming. Rare.

92.

, & Huang

(2015). Treatment of an anonymous recipient: Solid-waste management simulation game. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 568–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115585928

93.

(2012). Exploring the new ecological paradigm scale for gauging children’s environmental attitudes in China. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(2), 107–120.

94.

Yang

J. C.

, Chien

K. H.

, & Liu

T. C.

(2012). A digital game-based learning system for energy education: An energy COnservation PET. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 27–37.

95.

Yang

J. C.

, Lin

Y. L.

, & Liu

Y. C.

(2017). Effects of locus of control on behavioural intention and learning performance of energy knowledge in game-based learning. Environmental Education Research, 23(6), 886–899.

96.

Zumbach

, Rammerstorfer

, & Deibl

(2020). Cognitive and metacognitive support in learning with a serious game about demographic change. Computers in Human Behaviour, 103, 120–129.