Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-3
Socio-economically Substantiated Education for Sustainable Development: Development of Competencies and Value Orientations Between Individual Responsibility and Structural Transformation
In this article, the concept of education for sustainable development is substantiated and expanded upon from a socio-economic perspective. Incorporating the concept of the economic citizen, we present the liberal republican civic ethos, moral judgement, decision-making capabilities and key competencies relevant for sustainability together with an informed understanding of economic context as constitutive elements of the educational concept. Against the backdrop of the limited reach of individual behavioural changes and the necessary reflections on structural questions, a heuristic of shared responsibility for sustainable development will be devised.
ArnoldR. & LermenM. (2005). Lernen, Bildung und Kompetenzentwicklung – neuere Entwicklungen in Erwachsenenbildung und Weiterbildung [Learning, education and competence development - recent developments in adult education and training]. In WiesnerG. & WolterA. (Eds.), Die lernende Gesellschaft. Lernkulturen und Kompetenzentwicklung in der Wissensgesellschaft (pp. 45–59) [The Learning Society. Learning cultures and competence development in the knowledge society]. Weinheim, Munich: Juventa.
2.
AssadourianE. (2010). The rise and fall of consumer cultures. In Worldwatch Institute (Ed.), State of the world 2010: Transforming cultures: From consumerism to sustainability (pp. 3–20). Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.
3.
BarryJ. (2005). Resistance is fertile: From environmental to sustainability citizenship. In BellD. & DobsonA. (Eds.), Environmental citizenship: Getting from here to there? (pp. 21–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BarthM. (2012). Social learning instead of educating the other. GAIA, 19(3), 91–94.
5.
BarthM.GodemannJ.RieckmannM. & StoltenbergU. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416–430.
6.
BeckerG. S. (1993). Human capital. A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BeschornerT.HajdukT. & SchankC. (2012). Ökonomie anders denken: Perspektiven nachhaltiger Entwicklung [Thinking economy differently: perspectives of sustainable development]. In StiftungB. (Ed.), Politik nachhaltig gestalten. Wie man nachhaltige Politik macht, kommuniziert und durchsetzt (pp. 82–109) [Making Politics Sustainable. How to make, communicate and enforce sustainable policies]. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
8.
BinswangerH. C. (2012). The growth spiral: Money, energy, and imagination in the dynamics of the market process. Marburg: Metropolis.
9.
DanielzikC.-M. (2013). Überlegenheitsdenken fällt nicht vom Himmel. Postkoloniale Perspektiven auf Globales Lernen und Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung [Superior thinking does not fall from the sky. Postcolonial Perspectives on Global Education and Education for Sustainable Development]. ZEP – Zeitschrift für internationale Bildungsforschung und Entwicklungspädagogik, 36(1), 26–33.
10.
de HaanG. (2010). The development of ESD-related competencies in supportive institutional frameworks. International Review of Education, 56(2), 315–328.
11.
EggertS. & BögeholzS. (2010). Students’ use of decision-making strategies with regard to socio-scientific issues: An application of the Rasch partial credit model. Science Education, 94(2), 230–258.
12.
EliasN. (2009). Was ist Soziologie? [What is sociology?]. München: Beltz Juventa.
13.
GeertzC. (1995). Dichte Beschreibung: Beiträge zum Verstehen kultureller Systeme[Thick Description: Contributions to the understanding of cultural systems]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
14.
GeweckeL.-M. & HuseO. (2011). Werte – Zwischen Erziehung und Sozialisation [Values - Between education and socialization]. In MikhailT. (Ed.), Zeitlose Probleme der Pädagogik – Pädagogik als zeitloses Problem?[Timeless Problems of Pedagogy - Pedagogy as a Timeless Problem?] Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.
15.
GodemannJ. & MichelsenG. (2011). Sustainability communication—An introduction. In GodemannJ. & MichelsenG. (Eds.), Sustainability communication. Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation (pp. 3–11). Dordrecht and New York, NY: Springer.
16.
GrunwaldA. (2010). Wider die Privatisierung der Nachhaltigkeit [Against the privatization of sustainability. Why ecologically correct consumption can not save the environment]. Warum ökologisch korrekter Konsum die Umwelt nicht retten kann. GAIA, 19(3), 178–182.
17.
HeinrichsH. (2011). Participation: Empowerment for sustainable development. In GodemannJ. & MichelsenG. (Eds.), Sustainability communication. Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation (pp. 187–198). Dordrecht and New York, NY: Springer.
18.
HellmannK.-U. (2013). Der Konsum der Gesellschaft. Studien zur Soziologie des Konsums [The consumption of society. Studies on the sociology of consumption]. Wiesbaden: Springer.
19.
HübnerR. (2012). Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation reloaded. Aporien als Chance für gesellschaftliche Lern- und Entwicklungsprozesse [Sustainability communication reloaded. Aporia as an opportunity for social learning and development processes]. GAIA, 21(4), 262–265.
20.
KashnizD. (2005). Ökonomische und politische Bildung sowie die Frage ihrer Integration aus der Perspektive einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Allgemeinbildungstheorie [Economic and political education as well as the question of its integration from the perspective of a social science general education theory]. In KashnizD. (Ed.), Integration von politischer und ökonomischer Bildung? [Integration of political and economic education?] (pp. 111–159). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
21.
KnopfJ. & BrinkA. (2011). Moralentwicklung und moralische Orientierung [Moral development and moral orientation]. In AßländerM. (Ed.), Handbuch Wirtschaftsethik [Handbook of Business Ethics] (pp. 20–25). Stuttgart and Weimar: J. Metzler.
22.
MaakT. & UlrichP. (2007). Integre Unternehmensführung. Ethisches Orientierungswissen für die Wirtschaftspraxis [Integre business management. Ethical orientation knowledge for business practice]. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
23.
MattenD. & CraneA. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.
24.
Meyer-AbichK. M. (2001). Nachhaltigkeit – ein kulturelles, bisher aber chancenloses Wirtschaftsziel [Sustainability - a cultural but hitherto chance-free economic goal]. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 2(3), 291–310.
25.
MichelsenG.SiebertH. & LiljeJ. (2011). Nachhaltigkeit lernen. Ein Lesebuch [Learning sustainability. A reading book]. Bad Homburg: VAS.
26.
MogensenF. & SchnackK. (2010). The action competence approach and the ‘new’ discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 59–74.
27.
MokroschR. (2008). Zum Verständnis von Werte-Erziehung: Aktuelle Modelle für die Schule [Understanding Values Education: Current Models for the School.]. In MokroschR. & RegenbogenA. (Eds.), Werte-Erziehung und Schule. Ein Handbuch für Unterrichtende [Values Education and School. A Handbook for Teachers] (pp. 32–40). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
28.
MulderK. (2014). Strategic competencies, critically important for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 78, 243–248.
29.
OttK.MuracaB. & BaatzC. (2011). Strong sustainability as a frame for sustainability communication. In GodemannJ. & MichelsenG. (Eds.), Sustainability communication. Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation (pp. 13–25). Dordrecht and New York, NY: Springer.
30.
PetersenT. (2012). Globale Herausforderungen für das Prinzip der Nachhaltigkeit [Global challenges to the principle of sustainability.]. In StiftungB. (Ed.), Politik nachhaltig gestalten. Wie man nachhaltige Politik macht, kommuniziert und durchsetzt [Making Politics Sustainable. How to make, communicate and enforce sustainable politics] (pp. 51–81). Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
31.
PolanyiK. (1978). The great transformation. Politische und ökonomische Ursprünge von Gesellschaften und Wirtschaftssystemen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
32.
RieckmannM. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning?Futures, 44(2), 127–135.
33.
RieckmannM.AdomßentM.HärdtleW. & AguirreP. (2011). Sustainable development and conservation of biodiversity hotspots in Latin America. The case of Ecuador. In ZachosF. E. & HabelJ. C. (Eds.), Biodiversity hotspots. Distribution and protection of conservation priority areas (pp. 435–452). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
34.
RieckmannM.FischerD. & RichterS. (2014). Nachhaltige Ernährung im Wertediskurs –Beiträge einer Hochschulbildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung [Sustainable nutrition in the value discourse - Contributions of higher education for sustainable development]. In SchankC.VorbohleK. & QuandtJ. H. (Eds.), Perspektive Nahrungsmittelethik [Perspective Food Ethics] (pp. 29–58). München and Mering: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
35.
RöpkeW. (1961). Jenseits von Angebot und Nachfrage [Beyond supply and demand]. Stuttgart and Zürich: Rentsch.
36.
SchankC. & BeschornerT. (2017). Unternehmensverantwortung aus wirtschaftswissens- chaftlichen Perspektiven [Corporate responsibility from economic perspectives]. In Backhaus-MaulH.KunzeM. & NährlichS. (Eds.), GesellschaftlicheVerantwortung von Unternehmen in Deutschland [Corporate Social Responsibility of Companies in Germany] (pp. 175-196). Heidelberg: Springer VS.
37.
SchankC. & LorchA. (2014). Der Wirtschaftsbürger als Subjekt einer sozioökonomischen Bildung [The economic citizen as the subject of a socio-economic education]. In FischerA. & ZurstrassenB. (Eds.), Sozio-ökonomische Bildung – Konzepte einer politischen, sozialen, kulturellen und wertorientierten sozio-ökonomischen Bildung [Socio-economic education - Concepts of a political, social, cultural and value-based socio-economic education] (pp. 266–284). Bonn: BPB.
38.
SchererA. G. & PalazzoG. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility—Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.
39.
SchneidewindU. (2013). Transformative literacy. Gesellschaftliche Veränderungsprozesse verstehen und gestalten [Transformative Literacy. Understanding and shaping social change processes]. GAIA, 22(2), 82–86.
40.
SchraderU. (2011). Corporate citizenship. In AßländerM. (Ed.), Handbuch Wirtschaftsethik [Handbook of Business Ethics] (pp. 303–311). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
41.
SchreiberJ. R. & SiegeH. (Eds.). (2016). Curriculumframework. Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://ensi.org/global/downloads/Publications/418/Curriculum%20Framework%20ESD%20final%201.pdf
42.
SchwarzI. & SchrüferG. (Eds.). (2014). Vielfältige Geographien. Entwicklungslinien für Globales Lernen, Interkulturelles Lernen und Wertediskurse [Diverse geographies. Development Lines for Global Education, Intercultural Learning and Value Discourses]. Münster and New York, NY: Waxmann.
43.
SchwedesR. (2004). Sustainability Science – Schlagwort oder Chance für die betriebs- wirtschaftliche Forschung [Sustainability Science - buzzword or opportunity for business research]. In FreimannJ. (Ed.), Akteure einer nachhaltigen Unternehmen-sentwicklung [Actors of Sustainable Company Development] (pp. 147–165). München and Mering: Rainer Hampp.
44.
SteinM. (2008). Wie können wir Kindern Werte vermitteln? Werteerziehung in Familie und Schule [How can we convey values to children? Values education in family and school]. München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.
45.
StibbeA. (Ed.). (2009). The handbook of sustainability literacy. Skills for a changing world. Totnes: Green.
46.
ThomasI.BarthM. & DayT. (2013). Education for sustainability, graduate capabilities, professional employment: How they all connect. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 33–51.
47.
TilburyD.StevensonR.FienJ. & SchreuderD. (Eds.). (2002). Education and sustainability. Responding to the global challenge. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Cambridge and Gland: IUCN Commission on Education and Communication.
48.
UlrichP. (1997). Wofür sind Unternehmen verantwortlich? [What are companies responsible for?]Forum Wirtschaftsethik, 5(3), 3–9.
49.
UlrichP. (1998). Unternehmensethik und „Gewinnprinzip’’. Versuch der Klärung eines unerled- igten wirtschaftsethischen Grundproblems [Business ethics and “principle of profit”. Attempt to clarify an unfinished ethical business problem](Berichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsethik, Nr. 70) [Reports of the Institute of Business Ethics, No. 70). St. Gallen: Institut für Wirtschaftsethik.
50.
UlrichP. (2000). Integrative Wirtschaftsethik: Grundlagenreflexion der ökonomischen Vernunft [Integrative Business Ethics: Fundamental reflection of economic reason]. Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, 11(4), 555–567.
51.
UlrichP. (2005). Zivilisierte Marktwirtschaft: Eine wirtschaftsethische Orientierung[Civilized market economy: an economic ethical orientation]. Bern: Haupt.
52.
UlrichP. (2006). Politische Ökonomie, wirtschaftsethisch rekonfiguriert. Funktionale Systemökonomie im Kontext praktischer Sozialökonomie (pp. 164-182) [Political economy, economically reconfigured. Functional system economics in the context of practical social economy]. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik (zfwu).
53.
UlrichP. (2008). Integrative economic ethics. Foundations of a civilized market economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
UlrichP. (2009). Die gesellschaftliche Einbettung der Marktwirtschaft als Kernproblem des 21. Jahrhunderts: eine wirtschaftsethische Fortschrittsperspektive (Berichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsethik, Nr. 115) [The social embedding of the market economy as the core problem of the 21st century: an economic-ethical perspective for progress]. (Reports of the Institute of Business Ethics, No. 115). St. Gallen: Institut für Wirtschaftsethik.
55.
UlrichP. (2010). Zivilisierte Marktwirtschaft: Eine wirtschaftsethische Orientierung [Civilized market economy: an economic ethical orientation.]. Aktualisierte und erweiterte Neuausgabe [Updated and extended revision]. Bern: Haupt.
56.
UN Documents Cooperation Circles (n.d.). Agenda 21, Chapter 36: Promoting education, public awareness and training. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/a21-36.htm
57.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) (2005). UNECE strategy for education for sustainable development. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/env/documents/2005/cep/ac.13/cep.ac.13.2005.3.rev.1.e.pdf
58.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural, Organization (UNESCO) (2014). UNESCO Roadmap zur Umsetzung des Weltaktionsprogramms ‘‘Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung’’ [Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2014). UNESCO Roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development.]. Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/files/2015_Roadmap_deutsch.pdf
59.
VareP. & ScottW. (2007). Learning for a change: Exploring the relationship between education and sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(2), 191–198.
60.
WalsA. E. J. (2010). Mirroring, Gestaltswitching and transformative social learning: Stepping stones for developing sustainability competence. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 380–390.
61.
WalsA. E. J. (2011). Learning our way to sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5(2), 177–186.
62.
WalsA. E. J. (2015). Beyond unreasonable doubt. Education and learning for socio-ecological sustainability in the anthropocene. Wageningen: Wageningen University. Retrieved from https://arjenwals.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/8412100972_rvb_inauguratie-wals_oratieboekje_v02.pdf
63.
WalsA. E. J. & LengletF. (2016). Sustainability citizens: Collaborative and disruptive social learning. In HorneR.FienJ.BezaB. & NelsonA. (Eds.), Sustainability citizenship in cities: Theory and practice (pp. 52–66). London, UK: Routledge.
64.
WBGU. (Eds.) (2011). Flagship report. World in transition. A social contract for sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu.de/templates/dateien/veroeffentlichungen/hauptgutachten/jg2011/wbgu_jg2011_en.pdf
65.
WeberM. (1919). Politik als Beruf. Geistige Arbeit als Beruf. Vier Vorträge vor dem Freistudentischen Bund. Zweiter Vortrag [Politics as a vocation. Spiritual work as a profession. Four lectures in front of the Freistudentischen Bund. Second lecture.]. München and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
66.
WeinertF. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In RychenD. S. & SalganikL. H. (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). Seattle, Toronto, Bern and Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
67.
WiekA.WithycombeL. & RedmanC. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218.
68.
WiekA.BernsteinM. J.FoleyR. W.CohenM.ForrestN.KuzdasC. … Withcombe KeelerL. (2016). Operationalising competencies in higher education for sustainable development. In BarthM.MichelsenG.ThomasI. & RieckmannM. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of higher education for sustainable development (pp. 241–260). London, UK: Routledge.
69.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/a21-36.htm
