This study examines the interaction of political orientation with academic discipline on beliefs in anthropogenic climate change (ACC) among higher education faculty. Over 300 faculty members at two research institutions in the United States were surveyed on topics concerning ACC and the results were analyzed with multiple regression. Even among professors, there was a strong relationship between political orientation (liberal versus conservative) and belief in ACC; however, the relationship was substantially attenuated among professors who taught courses in liberal arts and education. On the other hand, the relationship between political orientation and ACC belief was much stronger among faculty teaching business and hotel management, compared to faculty teaching other subjects. Finally, there was a main positive effect for teaching science. The results suggest that outreach efforts to encourage more faculty to include climate change relevant information in their courses might give high priority to faculty in liberal arts and education.
BeckA., SinatraG.M., & LombardiD. (2013). Leveraging higher-education instructors in the climate literacy effort: Factors related to university faculty’s propensity to teach climate change. The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Response, 4(4), 1–17. Retrieved 8August2014, from https://rossier.usc.edu/files/2013/09/beck_et_al._2013_climate_impacts.pdf
2.
BoykoffM., & BoykoffJ. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 125–136. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
3.
ChinnC.A., & BrewerW.F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O
4.
ChinnC.A., BucklandL.A., & SamarapungavanA. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
5.
CIRES. (2014). Common misconceptions about climate and climate change. Making climate hot: Effectively communicating climate change. Retrieved 8August2014, from http://cires.colorado.edu/education/outreach/climateCommunication/CC%20Misconceptions%20Handout.pdf
6.
EntmanR. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
7.
FeldmanL., MyersT.A., HmielowskiJ.D., & LeiserowitzA. (2014). The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: Testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 590–611. doi:10.1111/jcom.12108
8.
HamiltonL.C. (2008). Who cares about polar regions?Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 40(4), 671–678. doi:10.1657/1523-0430(07-105)[HAMILTON]2.0.CO;2
9.
HamiltonL.C. (2011). Education, politics, and opinions about climate change: Evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change, 104(2), 231–242. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
10.
HardistyD.J., JohnsonE.J., & WeberE.U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation and query theory. Psychological Science, 21(1), 86–92. doi:10.11/0177/0956797609355572
11.
HartP.S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28–51. doi:10.1177/1075547010366400
12.
HumeD. (1739). A treatise of human nature. London: John Noon.
13.
HussarW.J., & BaileyT.M. (2013). Projections of education statistics to 2022(NCES 2014-051; U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14.
KnightG., & GreenbergJ. (2011). Talk of the enemy: Adversarial framing and climate change discourse. Social Movement Studies, 10(4), 323–340. doi:10.1080/14742837.2011.614102
15.
KrosnickJ.A., AllysonL.H., & VisserP.S. (2000). The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 239–260. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/303
16.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
17.
LeiserowitzA. (2007). Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In MoserS.C. & DillingL. (Eds), Creating a climate of change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 44–63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1038/nclimate1754
18.
LeiserowitzA., MaibachE., Roser-RenoufC., FeinbergG., & HoweP. (2013). Global warming’s six Americas, September 2011(Yale University and George Mason University). New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved 15February2015, from http://environment.yale.edu/climate/publications/Six-Americas-September2012
19.
LewandowskyS., GignacG., & VaughanS. (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399–404. doi:10.1038/nclimate1720
20.
LombardiD., SinatraG. M., & NussbaumE. M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students’ climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27(1), 50–62. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.001
21.
MalkaA., KrosnickJ.A., & LangerG. (2009). The association of knowledge with concern about global warming. Risk Analysis, 29(5), 633–647. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x
22.
McCrightA.M. (2011). Political orientation moderates Americans’ beliefs and concern about climate change. Climatic Change, 104(2), 243–253. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9946-y
23.
McCrightA.M., & DunlapR.E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2011. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
24.
MillerJ.D. (2012). Climate change: Generation X attitudes, interest, and understanding. The Generation X Report: A Quarterly Research Report from the Longitudinal Study of American Youth, 1(4), 1–7. Retrieved 13June2013, from http://www.eenews.net/assets/2012/07/16/document_gw_02.pdf
25.
MooneyC. (2012). The Republican brain: The science of why they deny science and reality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
26.
MuisK.R., BendixenL.D., & HaerleF.C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–54. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6
27.
Nevada Climate Change Portal (NCCP). (2014). Retrieved 23February2013, from http://sensor.nevada.edu/NCCP/Education/Post%20Secondary/Default.aspx
28.
NisbetE.C., HartP.S., MyersT., & EllithorpeM. (2013). Attitude change in competitive framing environments? Open-/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 766–785. doi:10.1111/jcom.12040
29.
NisbetM.C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment, 51(2), 12–23. Retrieved 8August2014, from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/burn0277/pa5012/readings/Nisbet%202000%20-%20Communicating%20Climate%20Change.pdf
30.
NussbaumE. M. (2015). Categorical and nonparametric data analysis: Choosing the best statistical technique. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
31.
Pew Research Center for the People and the, Press (2009). Economy, jobs trump all other policy priorities in 2009. Retrieved 13June2013, from http://www.people-press.org/2009/01/22/economy-jobs-trump-all-other-policy-priorities-in-2009/
32.
ShepardsonD.P., NiyogiD., ChoiS., & CharusombatU. (2009). Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 549–570. doi:10.1080/13504620903114592
33.
ThagardP., & FindlayS. (2011). Changing minds about climate change: Belief revision, coherence, and emotion. In OlssonE.J. & EnqvisatS. (Eds), Belief revision meets philosophy of science: Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science (Vol. 21) (pp. 329–345). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9609-8_14
34.
TrautweinU., & LüdtkeO. (2007). Epistemological beliefs, school achievement, and college major: A large-scale longitudinal study on the impact of certainty beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 348–366. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.11.003
